Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.
Gepubliceerd in:
2024 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk
23. 2D and 3D endoscopic surgery
Auteur : MD Amir Szold
Gepubliceerd in: The Technical Principles of Endoscopic Surgery
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
share
DELEN
Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)
-
Optie A:
-
Optie B:Deel de link per e-mail
Abstract
Endoscopic surgery has relied on two dimensional images for decades. Recent innovations in imaging technology have provided high quality three dimensional systems, which may improve surgical performance. In this chapter, the core concepts of three dimensional view are explained, and technical details on equipment are provided. The advantages and challenges of three dimensional view are supported by an extensive literature review.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Wheatstone C. Contribution to the physiology of vision. Part the first. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1838;128:371–94.
Wheatstone C. Contribution to the physiology of vision. Part the first. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1838;128:371–94.
2.
go back to reference Parker AJ. Stereoscopic vision. In: Squire LR, editor. Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Elsevier; 1991. p. 411–7.
Parker AJ. Stereoscopic vision. In: Squire LR, editor. Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Elsevier; 1991. p. 411–7.
3.
go back to reference Allison RS, Wilcox LM. Stereoscopic depth constancy from a different direction. Vision Res. 2021;178:70–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2020.10.003.CrossRefPubMed
Allison RS, Wilcox LM. Stereoscopic depth constancy from a different direction. Vision Res. 2021;178:70–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2020.10.003.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Alkatout I, Mechler U, Mettler L, Pape J, Maass N, Biebl M, et al. The development of laparoscopy – a historical overview. Front Surg. 2021;8: 799442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.799442.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Alkatout I, Mechler U, Mettler L, Pape J, Maass N, Biebl M, et al. The development of laparoscopy – a historical overview. Front Surg. 2021;8: 799442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.799442.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Wagner OJ, Hagen M, Kurmann A, Horgan S, Candinas D, Vorburger SA. Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10):2961–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2295-3.CrossRefPubMed
Wagner OJ, Hagen M, Kurmann A, Horgan S, Candinas D, Vorburger SA. Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10):2961–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2295-3.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McLachlan G. From 2D to 3D: the future of surgery? The Lancet. 2011;378(9800):1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61597-3.CrossRef
McLachlan G. From 2D to 3D: the future of surgery? The Lancet. 2011;378(9800):1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61597-3.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boppart S, Deutsch T, Rattner D. Optical imaging technology in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:718–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649901081.CrossRefPubMed
Boppart S, Deutsch T, Rattner D. Optical imaging technology in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:718–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649901081.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM, Conrad J, Gurland B, Shlasko E, et al. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System. Am J Surg. 2007;193(4):519–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.042.CrossRefPubMed
Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM, Conrad J, Gurland B, Shlasko E, et al. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System. Am J Surg. 2007;193(4):519–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.042.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dion YM, Gaillard F. Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(10):995–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900510.CrossRefPubMed
Dion YM, Gaillard F. Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(10):995–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900510.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Francis NK, Bonino MA, Curtis NJ, Amparore D, et al. The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc. 2018;33(10):3251–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06612-x.CrossRefPubMed
Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Francis NK, Bonino MA, Curtis NJ, Amparore D, et al. The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc. 2018;33(10):3251–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06612-x.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dunstan M, Smith R, Schwab K, Scala A, Gatenby P, Whyte M, et al. Is 3D faster and safer than 4K laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A randomised-controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(4):1729–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06958-w.CrossRefPubMed
Dunstan M, Smith R, Schwab K, Scala A, Gatenby P, Whyte M, et al. Is 3D faster and safer than 4K laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A randomised-controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(4):1729–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06958-w.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hänggi W. Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(5):469–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649901014.
Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hänggi W. Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(5):469–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649901014.
13.
go back to reference Wilhelm D, Reiser S, Kohn N, et al. Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(8):2387–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3487-9.CrossRefPubMed
Wilhelm D, Reiser S, Kohn N, et al. Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(8):2387–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3487-9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zhou J, Xu HJ, Liang CZ, Zhang L, Hao ZY, Feng LX. A comparative study of distinct ocular symptoms after performing laparoscopic surgical tasks using a three-dimensional surgical imaging system and a conventional two-dimensional surgical imaging system. J Endourol. 2015;29(7):816–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0759.CrossRefPubMed
Zhou J, Xu HJ, Liang CZ, Zhang L, Hao ZY, Feng LX. A comparative study of distinct ocular symptoms after performing laparoscopic surgical tasks using a three-dimensional surgical imaging system and a conventional two-dimensional surgical imaging system. J Endourol. 2015;29(7):816–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0759.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Usta TA, Ozkaynak A, Kovalak E, Ergul E, Naki MM, Kaya E. An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(8):2305–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3949-0.CrossRefPubMed
Usta TA, Ozkaynak A, Kovalak E, Ergul E, Naki MM, Kaya E. An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(8):2305–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3949-0.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zwimpfer TA, Lacher D, Fellmann-Fischer B, Mueller M. A laparoscopic study investigating 3D vs 2D imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model with experts, non-experts, and students. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):276. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00892-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zwimpfer TA, Lacher D, Fellmann-Fischer B, Mueller M. A laparoscopic study investigating 3D vs 2D imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model with experts, non-experts, and students. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):276. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00892-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Sakata S, Grove PM, Hill A, Watson MO, Stevenson AR. The viewpoint-specific failure of modern 3D displays in laparoscopic surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016;401(7):1007–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1495-z.CrossRefPubMed
Sakata S, Grove PM, Hill A, Watson MO, Stevenson AR. The viewpoint-specific failure of modern 3D displays in laparoscopic surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016;401(7):1007–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1495-z.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Jun E, Alshahrani AA, Song KB, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Shin SH, et al. Validation and verification of three-dimensional systems in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(2):867–74. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13187.CrossRefPubMed
Jun E, Alshahrani AA, Song KB, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Shin SH, et al. Validation and verification of three-dimensional systems in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(2):867–74. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13187.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lusch A, Bucur PL, Menhadji AD, Okhunov Z, Liss MA, Perez-Lanzac A, et al. Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance. J Endourol. 2014;28(2):261–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0344.CrossRefPubMed
Lusch A, Bucur PL, Menhadji AD, Okhunov Z, Liss MA, Perez-Lanzac A, et al. Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance. J Endourol. 2014;28(2):261–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0344.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Fergo C, Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Kildebro N, Rosenberg J. Three-dimensional laparoscopy vs 2-dimensional laparoscopy with high-definition technology for abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2017;213(1):159–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.030.CrossRefPubMed
Fergo C, Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Kildebro N, Rosenberg J. Three-dimensional laparoscopy vs 2-dimensional laparoscopy with high-definition technology for abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2017;213(1):159–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.030.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Koppatz H, Harju J, Sirén J, Mentula P, Scheinin T, Sallinen V. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(11):3725–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06666-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Koppatz H, Harju J, Sirén J, Mentula P, Scheinin T, Sallinen V. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(11):3725–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06666-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Curro G, La Malfa G, Caizzone A, Rampulla V, Navarra G. Three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a single-surgeon prospective randomized comparative study. Obes Surg. 2015;25(11):2120–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1674-y.CrossRefPubMed
Curro G, La Malfa G, Caizzone A, Rampulla V, Navarra G. Three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a single-surgeon prospective randomized comparative study. Obes Surg. 2015;25(11):2120–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1674-y.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hoffmann E, Bennich G, Larsen CR, Lindschou J, Jakobsen JC, Lassen PD. 3-dimensional versus conventional laparoscopy for benign hysterectomy: protocol for a randomized clinical trial. BMC Women’s Health. 2017;17(1):76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0434-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Hoffmann E, Bennich G, Larsen CR, Lindschou J, Jakobsen JC, Lassen PD. 3-dimensional versus conventional laparoscopy for benign hysterectomy: protocol for a randomized clinical trial. BMC Women’s Health. 2017;17(1):76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0434-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Leon P, Rivellini R, Giudici F, Sciuto A, Pirozzi F, Corcione F. 3D vision provides shorter operative time and more accurate intraoperative surgical performance in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair compared with 2D vision. Surg Innov. 2017;24(2):155–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350616687434.CrossRefPubMed
Leon P, Rivellini R, Giudici F, Sciuto A, Pirozzi F, Corcione F. 3D vision provides shorter operative time and more accurate intraoperative surgical performance in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair compared with 2D vision. Surg Innov. 2017;24(2):155–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350616687434.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lu J, Zheng CH, Zheng HL, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, et al. Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an interim report. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2017;31(7):2939–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5310-2.CrossRef
Lu J, Zheng CH, Zheng HL, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, et al. Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an interim report. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2017;31(7):2939–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5310-2.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Velayutham V, Fuks D, Nomi T, Kawaguchi Y, Gayet B. 3D visualization reduces operating time when compared to highdefinition 2D in laparoscopic liver resection: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2016;30(1):147–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4174-1.CrossRef
Velayutham V, Fuks D, Nomi T, Kawaguchi Y, Gayet B. 3D visualization reduces operating time when compared to highdefinition 2D in laparoscopic liver resection: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2016;30(1):147–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4174-1.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wang Z, Liang J, Chen J, Mei S, Liu Q. Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy: a single-surgeon prospective randomized comparative study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020;21(10):2883–7. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.10.2883.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Wang Z, Liang J, Chen J, Mei S, Liu Q. Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy: a single-surgeon prospective randomized comparative study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020;21(10):2883–7. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.10.2883.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Currò G, Cogliandolo A, Bartolotta M, Navarra G. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26(3):213–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2015.0557.CrossRefPubMed
Currò G, Cogliandolo A, Bartolotta M, Navarra G. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26(3):213–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2015.0557.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Curtis NJ, Conti JA, Dalton R, Rockall TA, Allison AS, Ockrim JB. 2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(10):3370–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06630-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Curtis NJ, Conti JA, Dalton R, Rockall TA, Allison AS, Ockrim JB. 2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(10):3370–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06630-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Su H, Jin W, Wang P, Bao M, Wang X, Zhao C, et al. Comparing short-time outcomes of three-dimensional and two-dimensional totally laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer using overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:669–75. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S187535.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Su H, Jin W, Wang P, Bao M, Wang X, Zhao C, et al. Comparing short-time outcomes of three-dimensional and two-dimensional totally laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer using overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:669–75. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S187535.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Patankar SB, Padasalagi GR. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy in urology: a randomized study. Indian J Urol. 2017;33(3):226–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_418_16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Patankar SB, Padasalagi GR. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy in urology: a randomized study. Indian J Urol. 2017;33(3):226–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_418_16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Ruan Y, Wang XH, Wang K, Zhao YY, Xia SJ, et al. Clinical evaluation and technical features of three-dimensional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with selective segmental artery clamping. World J Urol. 2016;34(5):679–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1658-5.CrossRefPubMed
Ruan Y, Wang XH, Wang K, Zhao YY, Xia SJ, et al. Clinical evaluation and technical features of three-dimensional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with selective segmental artery clamping. World J Urol. 2016;34(5):679–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1658-5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Sánchez-Margallo FM, Durán RD, Serrano Pascual Á, Mayol Martínez JA, Sánchez-Margallo JA. Comparative study of the influence of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional urological laparoscopy on surgeons’ surgical performance and ergonomics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2021;35(2):123–37. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0284.CrossRefPubMed
Sánchez-Margallo FM, Durán RD, Serrano Pascual Á, Mayol Martínez JA, Sánchez-Margallo JA. Comparative study of the influence of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional urological laparoscopy on surgeons’ surgical performance and ergonomics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2021;35(2):123–37. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0284.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Qiu D, Zhuang H, Han F. Effect and influence factor analysis of intrahepatic Glisson’s sheath vascular disconnection approach for anatomical hepatectomy by three-dimensional lapaoroscope. J BUON. 2017;22(1):157–61.PubMed
Qiu D, Zhuang H, Han F. Effect and influence factor analysis of intrahepatic Glisson’s sheath vascular disconnection approach for anatomical hepatectomy by three-dimensional lapaoroscope. J BUON. 2017;22(1):157–61.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Yoon J, Kang SI, Kim MH, Kim MJ, Oh HK, Kim DW, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between 3D and 2D imaging laparoscopic colectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy for colon cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29(3):340–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0317.CrossRefPubMed
Yoon J, Kang SI, Kim MH, Kim MJ, Oh HK, Kim DW, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between 3D and 2D imaging laparoscopic colectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy for colon cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29(3):340–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0317.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Lee JK, Lee S, Kim JG, Lee YS, Lee KY, Park SJ, et al. Three dimensional laparoscopy improves surgical performance: comparative study in a cadaver. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2016;19:75–8.CrossRef
Lee JK, Lee S, Kim JG, Lee YS, Lee KY, Park SJ, et al. Three dimensional laparoscopy improves surgical performance: comparative study in a cadaver. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2016;19:75–8.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Broeders IAMJ, Kalisingh SS. Handboek endoscopische chirurgie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2009.
Broeders IAMJ, Kalisingh SS. Handboek endoscopische chirurgie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2009.
Metagegevens
- Titel
- 2D and 3D endoscopic surgery
- Auteur
-
MD Amir Szold
- Copyright
- 2024
- Uitgeverij
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
- Boek
-
The Technical Principles of Endoscopic Surgery
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2904-5
Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2905-2
Copyright: 2024
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2905-2_23