Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Gepubliceerd in:

01-12-2007

A Psychometric Evaluation of the Approach and Avoidance of Alcohol Questionnaire (AAAQ) in Alcohol Dependent Outpatients

Auteurs: Audrey A. Klein, Paul R. Stasiewicz, James R. Koutsky, Clara M. Bradizza, Scott F. Coffey

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 4/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

The Approach and Avoidance of Alcohol Questionnaire (AAAQ; McEvoy et al. in Addiction 99:482–497, 2004) was administered to a clinical sample of 138 alcohol dependent men and women. An exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the AAAQ factor structure and a confirmatory analysis run on a second administration of the AAAQ. Convergent validity was examined by conducting an alcohol cue reactivity test and by administering the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB), a retrospective calendar method for assessing alcohol consumption, and several measures of alcohol-related problems. The factor analysis supported a two-factor solution representing approach and avoidance dimensions. Regressions predicting measures of alcohol cue reactivity, alcohol consumption, and other alcohol-related constructs with the AAAQ provide support for its convergent validity. The results suggest that alcohol craving may be viewed as a multi-dimensional construct that includes both approach and avoidance inclinations which may vary depending on the population under examination.
vorige artikel The Driving Anger Expression Inventory: A Validity Study with Community College Student Drivers
volgende artikel The Role of Coping Styles and Self-efficacy in the Development of Dysphoric Mood Among Nursing Students
Voetnoten
1
The AAAQ has three different timeframes: “Right Now,” “Past 24 Hours,” and “Past Week.” The “Past Week” version was administered at Session 1, the baseline assessment session, and the “Right Now” version was administered prior to the cue reactivity test during Session 2.
 
2
In order to examine possible bias introduced into the factor analyses by using traditional methods on non-continuous Likert scale items (Bernstein and Teng 1989), factor analyses employing polychoric correlations of the items were conducted and the results compared to those reported here. There were no substantive differences found in those comparisons.
 
3
The items allowed to covary were: 4 and 19, 12 and 16, 11 and 18, and 8 and 15.
 
Literatuur
Anton, R. F. (1999). What is craving? Models and implications for treatment. Alcohol Research and Health, 23, 165–173.PubMed
Beck, A. T., Brown, G. K., & Steer, R. A. (1996). Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57, 289–300.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.PubMedCrossRef
Bernstein, I. H., & Teng, G. (1989). Factoring items and factoring scales are different: Spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 467–477.CrossRef
Blouin, A. G., Perez, E. L., & Blouin, J. H. (1988). Computerized administration of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Psychiatry Research, 23, 335–344.PubMedCrossRef
Breiner, M. J., Stritzke, W. G., & Lang, A. R. (1999). Approaching avoidance: A step essential to the understanding of craving. Alcohol Research & Health, 23, 197–206.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 132–162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Coffey, S. F., Saladin, M. E., Libet, J. M., Drobes, D. J., & Dansky, B. S. (1999). Differential urge and salivary responsivity to alcohol cues in alcohol-dependent patients: A comparison of traditional and stringent classification approaches. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7, 464–472.PubMedCrossRef
Collins, B. N., & Brandon, T. H. (2002). Effects of extinction context and retrieval cues on alcohol cue reactivity among nonalcoholic drinkers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 390–397.PubMedCrossRef
Erdman, H. P., Klein, M. H., Greist, J. H., Skare, S. S., Husted, J. J., Robins, L. N., et al. (1992). A comparison of two computer-administered versions of the NIMH diagnostic interview schedule. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 26, 85–95.PubMedCrossRef
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2000). Unrestricted versus restricted factor analysis of multidimensional test items: Some aspects of the problem and some suggestions. Psicológica, 21, 301–323.
Franken, I. H. A., De Haan, H. A., Van Der Meer, C. W., Haffmans, P. M. J., & Hendriks, V. M. (1999). Cue reactivity and effects of cue exposure in abstinent post-treatment drug users. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 16, 81–85.PubMedCrossRef
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrica, 30, 179–185.CrossRef
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRef
Kozlowski, L. T., Mann, R. E., Wilkinson, D. A., & Poulos, C. X. (1989). “Cravings” are ambiguous: Ask about urges or desires. Addictive Behaviors, 14, 443–445.PubMedCrossRef
Kozlowski, L. T., Pilliterri, J. L., Sweeney, C. T., Whitfield, K. E., & Graham, J. W. (1996). Asking questions about urges or cravings for cigarettes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 10, 248–260.CrossRef
Kozlowski, L. T., & Wilkinson, D. A. (1987). Use and misuse of the concept of craving by alcohol, tobacco, and drug researchers. British Journal of Addiction, 82, 31–36.PubMedCrossRef
Leigh, B. C., & Stacy, A. (1993). Alcohol outcome expectancies: Scale construction and predictive utility in higher order confirmatory models. Psychological Assessment, 5, 216–229.CrossRef
Levitan, R. D., Blouin, A. G., Navarro, J. R., & Hill, J. (1991). Validity of the computerized DIS for diagnosing psychiatric inpatients. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 728–731.
McEvoy, P. M., Stritzke, W. G., French, D. J., Lang, A. R., & Ketterman, R. L. (2004). Comparison of three models of alcohol craving in young adults: A cross-validation. Addiction, 99, 482–497.PubMedCrossRef
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. New York: Guilford.
Miller, W. R., & Tonigan, J. S. (1996). Assessing drinkers’ motivation for change: The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Psychiatry and Addictive Behavior, 10, 81–89.CrossRef
Miller, W. R., Tonigan, J. S., & Longabaugh, R. (1995). The drinker inventory of consequences (DrInC): An instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse. NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series, vol. 4. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Monti, P. M., Binkoff, J. A., Abrams, D. B., Zwick, W. R., Nirenberg, T. D., & Liepman, M. R. (1987). Reactivity of alcoholics and nonalcoholics to drinking cues. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 122–126.PubMedCrossRef
O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396–402.
Robins, L., Cotter, L., Bucholz, K., & Compton, W. (1995). Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV. St. Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine.
Rohsenow, D. J., Monti, P. M., Rubonis, A. V., Sirota, A. D., Niaura, R. S., Colby, S., et al. (1994). Cue reactivity as a predictor of drinking among male alcoholics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 620–626.PubMedCrossRef
Sayette, M. A., Shiffman, S., Tiffany, S. T., Niaura, R. S., Martin, C. S., & Shadel, W. G. (2000). The measurement of drug craving. Addiction, 95(Supplement 2), 189–210.CrossRef
Sinha, R., Fuse, T., Aubin, L.-R., & O’Malley, S. S. (2000). Psychological stress, drug-related cues and cocaine craving. Psychopharmacology, 152, 140–148.PubMedCrossRef
Skinner, H. A., & Allen, B. A. (1982). Alcohol dependence syndrome: Measurement and validation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91, 199–209.PubMedCrossRef
Smith-Hoerter, K., Stasiewicz, P. R., & Bradizza, C. M. (2004). Subjective reactions to alcohol cue exposure: A qualitative analysis of patients’ self-reports. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 402–406.PubMedCrossRef
Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1992). Timeline followback: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In J. Allen & R. Z. Litten (Eds.), Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biological methods (pp. 41–72), Totowa, NJ: Humana.
Stasiewicz, P. R., Gulliver, S. B., Bradizza, C. M., Torrisi, R., Rohsenow, D. J., & Monti, P. M. (1997). Exposure to negative emotional cues and alcohol cue reactivity with alcoholics: A preliminary investigation. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 35, 1143–1149.CrossRef
Stasiewicz, P. R., & Maisto, S. A. (1993). Two-factor avoidance theory: The role of negative affect in the maintenance of substance use and substance use disorder. Behavior Therapy, 24, 337–356.CrossRef
Stritzke, W. G., Breiner, M. J., Curtin, J. J., & Lang, A. R. (2004). Assessment of substance cue reactivity: Advances in reliability, specificity, and validity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 148–159.PubMedCrossRef
Tiffany, S. T., & Conklin, C. A. (2000). A cognitive processing model of alcohol craving and compulsive alcohol use. Addiction, 95(Supplement 2), 145–153.CrossRef
van Prooijen, J. W., & van der Kloot, W. A. (2001). Confirmatory analysis of exploratively obtained factor structures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 777–792.CrossRef
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 432–442.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Approach and Avoidance of Alcohol Questionnaire (AAAQ) in Alcohol Dependent Outpatients
Auteurs
Audrey A. Klein
Paul R. Stasiewicz
James R. Koutsky
Clara M. Bradizza
Scott F. Coffey
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-007-9044-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2007

Incremental Validity of Coping-oriented Marijuana Use Motives in the Prediction of Affect-based Psychological Vulnerability

Further Psychometric Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)

The Driving Anger Expression Inventory: A Validity Study with Community College Student Drivers

Peer Victimization in Youth with Tourette’s Syndrome and Chronic Tic Disorder: Relations with Tic Severity and Internalizing Symptoms

The Responses to Script-Driven Imagery Scale (RSDI): Assessment of State Posttraumatic Symptoms for Psychobiological and Treatment Research

The Role of Coping Styles and Self-efficacy in the Development of Dysphoric Mood Among Nursing Students