Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Gepubliceerd in:

01-02-2014 | Empirical Research

Best Friends’ Discussions of Social Dilemmas

Auteurs: Kristina L. McDonald, Tina Malti, Melanie Killen, Kenneth H. Rubin

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 2/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Peer relationships, particularly friendships, have been theorized to contribute to how children and adolescents think about social and moral issues. The current study examined how young adolescent best friends (191 dyads; 53.4 % female) reason together about multifaceted social dilemmas and how their reasoning is related to friendship quality. Mutually-recognized friendship dyads were videotaped discussing dilemmas entailing moral, social-conventional and prudential/pragmatic issues. Both dyad members completed a self-report measure of friendship quality. Dyadic data analyses guided by the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model indicated that adolescent and friend reports of friendship qualities were related to the forms of reasoning used during discussion. Friends who both reported that they could resolve conflicts in a constructive way were more likely to use moral reasoning than friends who reported that their conflict resolution was poor or disagreed on the quality of their conflict resolution. The findings provide evidence for the important role that friendship interaction may play in adolescents’ social and moral development.
vorige artikel The Potential Role of Meaning in Life in the Relationship Between Bullying Victimization and Suicidal Ideation
volgende artikel Compliance with Parents’ Rules: Between-Person and Within-Person Predictions
Voetnoten
1
Dyads with one member being either high on withdrawn behavior (top 33 % on withdrawal and bottom 50 % on aggression), high on aggressive behavior (top 33 % on aggression and bottom 50 % on withdrawal), or low on both behaviors (bottom 50 % on withdrawal and aggression) were specifically targeted for participation in the laboratory portion of the study. Analyses indicated that individuals who came to the university-based laboratory did not differ from those who did not participate in the laboratory portion on indices of peer-nominated aggressive [t (1, 1459) = −.64, p = .52] or withdrawn behavior [t (1, 1459) = −1.59, p = .11] nor did the sample’s aggressive [t (377) = .49, p = .62] or withdrawn behavior [t (377) = 1.34, p = . 18] significantly differ from zero.
 
Literatuur
Banny, A. M., Heilbron, N., Ames, A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Relational benefits of relational aggression: Adaptive and maladaptive associations with adolescent friendship quality. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1153–1166. doi:10.​1037/​a0022546.PubMedCrossRef
Bowker, J. C., Fredstrom, B., Rubin, K. H., Rose-Krasnor, L., Booth-LaForce, C. L., & Laursen, B. (2010). Distinguishing children who form new best-friendships from those who do not. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 707–725. doi:10.​1177/​0265407510373259​.CrossRef
Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Turgeon, L., & Poulin, F. (2002). Assessing aggressive and depressed children’s social relations with classmates and friends: A matter of perspective. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 609–624. doi:10.​1023/​A:​1020863730902.PubMedCrossRef
Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the friendship qualities scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 471–484. doi:10.​1177/​0265407594113011​.CrossRef
Cillessen, A. H. N., Jiang, X. L., West, T. V., & Laszkowski, D. K. (2005). Predictors of dyadic friendship quality in adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 165–172. doi:10.​1080/​0165025044400036​0.CrossRef
Gottman, J. M., & Parker, J. G. (Eds.). (1987). Conversations of friends: Speculations on affective development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436.CrossRef
Keller, M. (1984). Resolving conflicts in friendship: The development of moral understanding in everyday life. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 140–158). New York: Wiley.
Keller, M. (2004). Self in relationship. In D. K. Lapsley & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development, self, and identity (pp. 269–300). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Keller, M., & Wood, P. (1989). Development of friendship reasoning: A study of interindividual differences in intraindividual change. Developmental Psychology, 25, 820–826.CrossRef
Kelman, H. C. (1999). Transforming the relationship between former enemies: A social-psychological analysis. In R. L. Rothstein (Ed.), After the peace: Resistance and reconciliation (pp. 193–205). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford.
Killen, M., & Rutland, A. (2011). Children and social exclusion: Morality, prejudice, and group identity. New York: Wiley/Blackwell.CrossRef
Killen, M., Rutland, A., & Jampol, N. (2009). Social exclusion in childhood and adolescence. In K. H. Rubin, W. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer relationships, interactions, and groups (pp. 249–266). New York: Guilford Press.
Ladd, G. W. (1983). Social networks of popular, average, and rejected children in school settings. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 283–307.
Laursen, B., & Pursell, G. R. (2009). Conflict in peer relationships. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 267–286). New York: Guilford.
Marrow, D. (1999). Seeking peace amid memories of war: Learning form the peace process in Northern Ireland. In R. L. Rothstein (Ed.), After the peace: Resistance and reconciliation (pp. 111–138). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
McDonald, K. L., Putallaz, M., Grimes, C. L., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Coie, J. D. (2007). Girl talk: Gossip, friendship, and sociometric status. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 53, 381–411. doi:10.​1353/​mpq.​2007.​0017.CrossRef
Mendelson, M. J., & Kay, A. C. (2003). Positive feelings in friendship: Does imbalance in the relationship matter? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 101–116. doi:10.​1177/​0265407503020100​5.
Moller, L. C., Hymel, S., & Rubin, K. H. (1992). Sex typing in play and popularity in middle childhood. Sex Roles, 26, 331–353.CrossRef
Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the moral domain. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Oh, W., Rubin, K. H., Bowker, J. C., Booth-LaForce, C. L., Rose-Krasnor, L., & Laursen, B. (2008). Trajectories of social withdrawal from middle childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 553–556.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611–621. doi:10.​1037/​0012-1649.​29.​4.​611.CrossRef
Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Kegan Paul.
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. doi:10.​3102/​1076998603100443​7.CrossRef
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3, Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 571–645). New York: Wiley.
Rubin, K. H., Bowker, J. C., McDonald, K. L., & Menzer, M. (2013). Peer relationships. (pp. 242–275). In P. Zelazo (Ed.), Oxford handbook of developmental psychology. Oxford: Elsevier.
Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (1999). Relations of peer acceptance, friendship adjustment, and social behavior to moral reasoning during early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 249–479. doi:10.​1177/​0272431699019002​006.CrossRef
Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding. New York: Academic Press.
Smetana, J. G. (1999). The role of parents in moral development: A social domain analysis. The Journal of Moral Education, 28, 311–321.CrossRef
Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 119–154). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Smetana, J. G. (2011). Adolescents, families, and social development: How teens construct their worlds. NY: Wiley/Blackwell.
Spencer, S. V., Bowker, J. C., Rubin, K. H., & Booth-LaForce, C. L. (2013). Similarity between friends in social information processing and associations with positive friendship quality and conflict. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59, 106–134. doi:10.​1353/​mpq.​2013.​0006.CrossRef
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
Turiel, E. (2006). The development of morality. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), W. Damon (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 789–857). New York: Wiley.
Walker, L. J. (2006). Gender and morality. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 93–118). Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Wojslawowicz, J. C., Rubin, K. H., Burgess, K. B., Rose-Krasnor, L., & Booth-LaForce, C. L. (2006). Behavioral characteristics associated with stable and fluid best friendship patterns in middle childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 671–693. doi:10.​1353/​mpq.​2006.​0000.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Best Friends’ Discussions of Social Dilemmas
Auteurs
Kristina L. McDonald
Tina Malti
Melanie Killen
Kenneth H. Rubin
Publicatiedatum
01-02-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9961-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2014

Compliance with Parents’ Rules: Between-Person and Within-Person Predictions

  • Empirical Research

Joseph O. Oluwole and Preston C. Green III, with the Assistance of Melissa Stackpole: Sext Ed: Obscenity Versus Free Speech in Our Schools

  • Book Review

Marcia J. Carlson and Paula England: Social Class and Changing Families in an Unequal America

  • Book Review

The Potential Role of Meaning in Life in the Relationship Between Bullying Victimization and Suicidal Ideation

  • Empirical Research

Bidirectional Influences Between Dimensions of Coparenting and Adolescent Adjustment

  • Empirical Research

David M. Brodzinsky and Adam Perman (eds.): Adoption by Lesbians and Gay Men: A New Dimension in Family Diversity

  • Book Review