Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

22-11-2016

Development of the forensic inpatient quality of life questionnaire: short version (FQL-SV)

Auteurs: S. H. H. Schel, Y. H. A. Bouman, E. C. W. Vorstenbosch, B. H. Bulten

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

Aim of this study was to develop a brief version of the Forensic inpatient Quality of Life questionnaire (FQL).

Methods

Data from a longitudinal study of quality of life (QoL) among long-term forensic psychiatric care (LFPC) patients (N = 130) were used. Per domain, the FQL item that correlated most highly with the mean domain score and Overall QoL was selected. Internal consistency was investigated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha. Construct validity was examined by investigating the relationship with the WHOQOL-Bref and EssenCES.

Results

The original division into 15 QoL domains was retained, while the number of items per domain was reduced to one or two. The amount of subjective items was shortened from 114 items to 19 items. Reliability analysis demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .79). Content validity was assured because the FQL-SV is based on the items of the original FQL that was derived from LFPC patient’s and staff’s opinions. Construct validity was demonstrated.

Conclusions

This study has shown that the FQL-SV is a psychometrically valid abbreviation of the FQL and can therefore be used to monitor or assess QoL in forensic psychiatric care. However, when certain domains should be targeted in treatment, the FQL (full version) can assist both the patient and the clinician to get a more complete view of the individualized targets they should be aiming at in order to improve QoL.
vorige artikel Can in-the-moment diary methods measure health-related quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy?
volgende artikel Condition-specific or generic preference-based measures in oncology? A comparison of the EORTC-8D and the EQ-5D-3L
Literatuur
1.
Andreasson, H., Nyman, M., Krona, H., Meyer, L., Anckarsäter, H., Nilsson, T., et al. (2014). Predictors of length of stay in forensic psychiatry: The influence of perceived risk of violence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37(6), 635–642.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Davoren, M., O’Dwyer, S., Abidin, Z., Naughton, L., Gibbons, O., Doyle, E., et al. (2012). Prospective in-patient cohort study of moves between levels of therapeutic security: the DUNDRUM-1 triage security, DUNDRUM-3 programme completion and DUNDRUM-4 recovery scales and the HCR-20. BMC Psychiatry, 12(1), 1–12.CrossRef
3.
Margetić, B., Margetić, B. A., & Ivanec, D. (2014). Can Personality Traits Affect Detention Length in a Forensic Institution? Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 14(4), 277–287.CrossRef
4.
Nagtegaal, M. H., Horst, R. P. V. D., & Schönberger, H. J. M. (2011). Inzicht in de verblijfsduur van tbs-gestelden : cijfers en mogelijke verklaringen [Understanding the duration of forensic psychiatric patients: numbers and possible explanations]. Meppel, Den Haag: WODC, Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie.
5.
O’Neill, C., Heffernan, P., Goggins, R., Corcoran, C., Linehan, S., Duffy, D., et al. (2003). Long-stay forensic psychiatric inpatients in the Republic of Ireland: aggregated needs assessment. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 20(04), 119–125.CrossRef
6.
Ross, T., Querengässer, J., Fontao, M. I., & Hoffmann, K. (2012). Predicting discharge in forensic psychiatry: The legal and psychosocial factors associated with long and short stays in forensic psychiatric hospitals. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35(3), 213–221.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Rutherford, M., & Duggan, S. (2007). Forensic Mental Health Services : facts and figures on current provision. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
8.
Purvis, M., Ward, T., & Willis, G. (2011). The good lives model in practice: Offence pathways and case management. European Journal of Probation, 3, 4–28.CrossRef
9.
Ward, T., Mann, R. E., & Gannon, T. A. (2007). The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 12, 87–107.CrossRef
10.
Fortune, C. A., Ward, T., & Polaschek, D. L. L. (2014). The Good Lives Model and Therapeutic Environments in Forensic Settings. Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, 35, 95–104.CrossRef
11.
Vorstenbosch, E. C. W., Bulten, B. H., Bouman, Y. H. A., & Braun, P. C. (2007). Forensic inpatient quality of life questionnaire. Nijmegen: Pompestichting.
12.
WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.CrossRef
13.
Oliver, J. P. J., Huxley, P., Priebe, S., & Kaiser, W. (1997). Measuring the quality of life of severely mentally ill people using the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiology, 32, 76–83.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Ormel, J., Lindenberg, S., Steverink, N., & Vonkorf, M. (1997). Quality of life and social production functions: A framework for understanding health effects. Social Science and Medicine, 45, 1051–1063.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Vorstenbosch, E. C. W., Bouman, Y. H. A., Braun, P. C., & Bulten, B. H. (2010). Kwaliteit van leven binnen de langdurige forensische psychiatrie. Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid, 11, 869–883.
16.
Vorstenbosch, E. C. W., Bouman, Y. H. A., Braun, P. C., & Bulten, B. H. (2014). Psychometric properties of the forensic inpatient quality of life questionnaire: Quality of life assessment for long-term forensic psychiatric care. Health Psychology and Behavioural Medicine: An open An Open Access Journal, 2, 335–348.CrossRef
17.
Schel, S. H. H., Bouman, Y. H. A., & Bulten, B. H. (2015). Quality of life in long-term forensic psychiatric care: Comparison of self-report and proxy assessments. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 29, 162–167.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental health disorders (4 th ed., text rev). Washington, DC: Author.
20.
WHOQOL Group.(2000). Australian WHOQOL 100, WHOQOL-Bref and CA-WHOQOL instruments: User’s Manual and interpretation guide. Melbourne WHOQOL Field Study Center, University of Melbourne, department of Psychiatry, ST Vincent’s Mental Health Service.
21.
Bulten, B. H., & Fluttert, F. A. J. (2010). Essen climate evaluation schema revised (EssenCES-NL). Institute of Forensic Psychiatry: University Duisburg-Essen.
22.
Tonkin, M., Howells, K., Ferguson, E., Clark, A., Newberry, M., & Schalast, N. (2012). Lost in Translation? Psychometric properties and construct validity of the English Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES) social climate questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 573–580.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Saloppé, Q., & Pham, T. H. (2006). Validation du WHOQOL-Bref en Hôpital psychiatrique sécuritaire [Validation of the WHOQOL-Bref in a forensic psychiatric hospital]. Psychiatrie et Violence, 1, 1–25.
24.
Schalast, N., Redies, M., Collins, M., Stacey, J., & Howells, K. (2008). EssenCES, a short questionnaire for assessing the social climate of forensic psychiatric wards. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 18, 49–58.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Middelboe, T., Schjodt, T., Byrsting, K., et al. (2001). Ward atmosphere in acute psychiatric in-patient care: patients’ perceptions, ideals and satisfaction. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 103, 212–219.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hilldsale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19, 539–549.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Goetz, C., Coste, J., Lemetayer, F., Rat, A., Montel, S., Recchia, S., et al. (2013). Item reduction based on rigorous methodological guidelines is necessary to maintain validity when shortening composite measurement scales. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66, 710–718.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. B., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194.CrossRef
30.
Shah, A., Waldron, G., Boast, N., Coid, J. W., & Ullrich, S. (2011). Factors associated with length of admission at a medium secure forensic psychiatric unit. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22(4), 496–512.CrossRef
31.
Sharma, A., Dunn, W., O’Toole, C., & Kennedy, H. G. (2015). The virtual institution: Cross-sectional length of stay in general adult and forensic psychiatry beds. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 9(1), 1–12.CrossRef
32.
Omer, S., Golden, E., & Priebe, S. (2016). Exploring the mechanisms of a patient- centred assessment with a solution focused approach (DIALOG +) in the community treatment of patients with psychosis: A process evaluation within a cluster- randomised controlled trial. Plos One, 11(2), e0148415.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metagegevens
Titel
Development of the forensic inpatient quality of life questionnaire: short version (FQL-SV)
Auteurs
S. H. H. Schel
Y. H. A. Bouman
E. C. W. Vorstenbosch
B. H. Bulten
Publicatiedatum
22-11-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1461-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2017

Using EQ-5D-3L and OAB-5D to assess changes in the health-related quality of life of men with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Employing quality control and feedback to the EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol to improve the quality of data collection

  • Open Access

Expanding a common metric for depression reporting: linking two scales to PROMIS® depression

Objectively measured sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity on the health-related quality of life in US adults: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006

Contextual and individual determinants of oral health-related quality of life in older Brazilians

Does the EQ-5D capture the effects of physical and mental health status on life satisfaction among older people? A path analysis approach