Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Gepubliceerd in:

01-02-2012

Evidence for a cognitive bias of interpretation toward threat in individuals with a Type D personality

Auteurs: Delphine Grynberg, Yori Gidron, Johan Denollet, Olivier Luminet

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 1/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Biological and behavioral mediators link Type D personality with a poor prognosis in heart disease. However, the mediator role of cognitive biases is still unknown. This study tested whether Type D individuals exhibit an interpretative bias for ambiguous social situations. For this aim we examined Type D and non-Type D individuals’ evaluations of written social situations that varied in terms of situations’ clarity (clear, ambiguous) and social judgment (neutral, negative). A convenience sample of 42 young, healthy adults rated each situation in relation to the difficulty of formulating a verbal response, anticipated distress, and perceived threat, and they completed the Type D personality scale (DS14; Denollet, 2005). Results showed an interpretation bias among Type D individuals, as they rated ambiguous or neutral situations as significantly more distressing compared to non-Type D individuals. Only clearly negative situations were rated similarly by Type D and non-Type D individuals. The discussion suggests that this interpretation bias in Type D individuals would increase their vulnerability to perceived stress.
vorige artikel Mindfulness based stress reduction in post-treatment breast cancer patients: an examination of symptoms and symptom clusters
volgende artikel Suppression of anger and subsequent pain intensity and behavior among chronic low back pain patients: the role of symptom-specific physiological reactivity
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
In ambiguous situations Type D individuals reported greater difficulties in formulating a verbal response and more anticipated distress than non-Type D individuals (respectively F(1, 41) = 10.80, p = .002, partial eta2 = .213; F(1, 41) = 22.37, P < .001, partial eta2 = .359). In clear situation these effects were respectively F(1,41) = 3.68, p = .06, partial eta2 = .084; F(1,41) = 10.90, p = .002, partial eta2 = .214).
 
Literatuur
Amir, N., Beard, C., & Bower, E. (2005). Interpretation bias and social anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 433–443.CrossRef
Amir, N., Foa, E. B., & Coles, M. E. (1998). Automatic activation and strategic avoidance of threat-relevant information in social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 285–290.PubMedCrossRef
Amir, N., Weber, G., Beard, C., Bomyea, J., & Taylor, C. (2008). The effect of a single session attention modification program on response to a public speaking challenge in socially anxious individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 860–868.PubMedCrossRef
Barefoot, J. C., Patterson, J. C., Haney, T. L., Cayton, T. G., Hickman, J. R., & Williams, R. B. (1994). Hostility in asymptomatic men with angiographically confirmed coronary-artery disease. American Journal of Cardiology, 74, 439–442.PubMedCrossRef
Bartko, J. J. (1966). The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports, 19, 3–11.PubMedCrossRef
Beard, C., & Amir, N. (2008). A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 1135–1141.PubMedCrossRef
Chida, Y., & Steptoe, A. (2009). The association of anger and hostility with future coronary heart disease: A meta-analytic review of prospective evidence. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53, 936–946.PubMedCrossRef
Clark, D. M. (2001). A cognitive perspective on social phobia. In W. R. Crozier & L. E. Alden (Eds.), International handbook of social anxiety: Concepts, research, and interventions relating to the self and shyness (pp. 405–430). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Conraads, V. M., Denollet, J., De Clerck, L. S., Stevens, W. J., Bridts, C., & Vrints, C. J. (2006). Type D personality is associated with increased levels of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and TNF-alpha receptors in chronic heart failure. International Journal of Cardiology, 113, 34–38.PubMedCrossRef
Dembroski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Costa, P. T., Jr, & Grandits, G. A. (1989). Components of hostility as predictors of sudden death and myocardial infarction in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51, 514–522.PubMed
Denollet, J. (2000). Type D personality—A potential risk factor refined. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 49, 255–266.PubMedCrossRef
Denollet, J. (2005). DS14: Standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and Type D personality. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 89–97.PubMedCrossRef
Denollet, J., & Brutsaert, D. L. (1998). Personality, disease severity, and the risk of long-term cardiac events in patients with a decreased ejection fraction after myocardial infarction. Circulation, 97, 167–173.PubMed
Denollet, J., Conraads, V. M., Brutsaert, D. L., De Clerck, L. S., Stevens, W. J., & Vrints, C. J. (2003). Cytokines and immune activation in systolic heart failure: The role of Type D personality. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 17, 304–309.PubMedCrossRef
Denollet, J., Pedersen, S. S., Vrints, C. J., & Conraads, V. M. (2006). Usefulness of type D personality in predicting five-year cardiac events above and beyond concurrent symptoms of stress in patients with coronary heart disease. American Journal of Cardiology, 97, 970–973.PubMedCrossRef
Denollet, J., Schiffer, A. A., & Spek, V. (2010). A general propensity to psychological distress affects cardiovascular outcomes: Evidence from research on the Type D (distressed) personality profile. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality Outcomes, 3, 546–557.CrossRef
Denollet, J., Sys, S. U., Stroobant, N., Rombouts, H., Gillebert, T. C., & Brutsaert, D. L. (1996). Personality as independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. Lancet, 347, 417–421.PubMedCrossRef
Frasure-Smith, N., & Lesperance, F. (2010). Depression and cardiac risk: present status and future directions. Heart, 96, 173–176.PubMedCrossRef
Heeren, A., Peschard, V., & Philippot, P. (submitted). The causal nature of attentional biases for threatening stimuli in the perception of social rejection.
Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The trier social stress test—A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28, 76–81.PubMedCrossRef
Kuper, H., Marmot, M., & Hemingway, H. (2002). Systematic review of prospective cohort studies of psychosocial factors in the etiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Seminars in Vascular Medicine, 2, 267–314.PubMedCrossRef
Martens, E. J., Kupper, N., Pedersen, S. S., Aquarius, A. E. A. M., & Denollet, J. (2007). Type-D personality is a stable taxonomy in post-MI patients over an 18-month period. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 63, 545–550.PubMedCrossRef
Murphy, R., Hirsch, C. R., Mathews, A., Smith, K., & Clark, D. M. (2007). Facilitating a benign interpretation bias in a high socially anxious population. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1517–1529.PubMedCrossRef
Nicholson, A., Kuper, H., & Hemingway, H. (2006). Depression as an etiologic and prognostic factor in coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of 6362 events among 146 538 participants in 54 observational studies. European Heart Journal, 27, 2763–2774.PubMedCrossRef
O’Dell, K., Masters, K. S., Spielmans, G. I., & Maisto, S. A. (in press). Does Type-D Personality predict outcomes among patients with cardiovascular disease? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research.
Paulsen, N., Callan, V. J., Grice, T. A., Rooney, D., Gallois, C., Jones, E., et al. (2005). Job uncertainty and personal control during downsizing: A comparison of survivors and victims. Human Relations, 58, 463–496.CrossRef
Rozanski, J., Juraszynski, Z., Kusmierczyk, M., & Sitko, T. (1999). Repair of coarctation of the aorta with simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 15, 536–538.PubMedCrossRef
Schiffer, A. A., Denollet, J., Widdershoven, J. W., Hendriks, E. H., & Smith, O. R. F. (2007). Failure to consult for symptoms of heart failure in patients with a Type D personality. Heart, 93, 814–818.PubMedCrossRef
Schmidt, N. B., Richey, J. A., Buckner, J. D., & Timpano, K. R. (2009). Attention training for generalized social anxiety disorder. Journal Abnormal Psychology, 118, 5–14.CrossRef
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.PubMedCrossRef
Stansfeld, S. A., Fuhrer, R., Shipley, M. J., & Marmot, M. G. (2002). Psychological distress as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in the Whitehall II Study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 248–255.PubMedCrossRef
van Melle, J., de Jonge, P., Spijkerman, T., Tijssen, J. G. P., Ormel, J., van Veldhuisen, D. J., et al. (2004). Prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 814–822.PubMedCrossRef
Voncken, M. J., Bogels, S. M., & de Vries, K. (2003). Interpretation and judgmental biases in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 1481–1488.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Evidence for a cognitive bias of interpretation toward threat in individuals with a Type D personality
Auteurs
Delphine Grynberg
Yori Gidron
Johan Denollet
Olivier Luminet
Publicatiedatum
01-02-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-011-9351-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2012

Predictors of unsuccessful magnetic resonance imaging scanning in older generalized anxiety disorder patients and controls

The association between chronic stress type and C-reactive protein in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: does gender make a difference?

Sexual minority status and trauma symptom severity in men living with HIV/AIDS

Mindfulness based stress reduction in post-treatment breast cancer patients: an examination of symptoms and symptom clusters

Discrimination as a key mediator of the relationship between posttraumatic stress and HIV treatment adherence among African American men

The role of prospective memory in medication adherence: a review of an emerging literature