Skip to main content

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top

Open Access 04-03-2025 | Opinion Paper

Improving patient-centred decisions in severe aortic stenosis care

Auteurs: Judith J. A. M. van Beek-Peeters, Miriam C. Faes, Mirela Habibovic, Ben J. L. Van den Branden, Martijn W. A. van Geldorp, Nardo J. M. van der Meer, Mirella M. N. Minkman

Gepubliceerd in: Netherlands Heart Journal

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
insite
ZOEKEN

Introduction

Decision-making in the treatment of older, symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) is complex due to multiple treatment options, patient characteristics and the personal preferences of both patients and professionals. Professional guidelines, including those from the Netherlands Society of Cardiology (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Cardiologie), and the Dutch Appropriate Care Framework emphasise the importance of shared decision-making (SDM) to integrate patient preferences and values, such as quality of life, into treatment decisions [15]. However, despite professionals’ willingness to adopt SDM, its implementation in daily practice remains a challenge.

Benefits of and barriers to shared decision-making

SDM is a well-defined process in which patients and professionals discuss care and cure decisions based on the best available evidence and the patient’s personal preferences and goals [6]. Treatment options for severe AS in older patients include conservative treatment and transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement [35]. SDM empowers patients by involving them actively in their healthcare decisions, leading to more personalised and effective treatments. It is a key principle of sustainable, accessible and personalised healthcare in the Netherlands [2].
However, despite its many benefits, implementing SDM into daily practice remains difficult. Identification of SDM barriers has led to strategies to support professionals (e.g. training in SDM), patients and caregivers (e.g. decision aids) and systemic improvements (e.g. leadership, care pathways). While these strategies are helpful, they are not a quick fix. This article provides 3 key themes at the professional, patient and process levels and offers practical advice for professionals to incorporate SDM into their daily routines (Fig. 1).

Key themes in shared decision-making

Specifying the professional role

SDM is a collaborative process that helps professionals recognise the valuable knowledge patients and their caregivers contribute to high-quality decisions. It integrates the expertise of professionals with the unique perspectives of patients. While patients are not expected to be treatment experts, they are encouraged to share their values and preferences, to ensure the best AS treatment for their personal situation.
Research on a goal-oriented SDM model has shown that patients’ personalised treatment goals are often missing in decision-making for severe AS [7]. While real-world conversations may differ, starting with the patient’s treatment goals is essential. Professionals should simply ask their patients: ‘What do you hope to do (again) after heart valve treatment?’ (Fig. 1). This question helps to gather patient input, shifts the focus from the disease to personal goals and values and aids in setting realistic treatment expectations.
Before consultations, the responsibility of asking this goal question can be assigned to the professional, such as the cardiologist, nurse practitioner or nurse. It must be ensured that all professionals acknowledge the patient’s response, and clear communication protocols are needed for consistency and clarity. Since SDM is ongoing and treatment goals for severe AS may change, repeating the goal question throughout the patient journey is also required.

Empowering patients

Effective SDM requires patients and their informal caregivers to take an active role in decision-making. Older patients, even those with low education levels or cognitive impairments, are often willing to participate in SDM when supported appropriately [8]. Informal caregivers can play a vital role in clarifying the patient’s personal contexts and facilitating communication with professionals.
Patient decision aids (PDAs) support SDM by guiding conversations between professionals and patients, but they must meet quality standards to be effectively implemented [8]. Integrating PDAs into workflows can be challenging, especially in cardiovascular practice. A Question Prompt List (QPL) is a structured tool to assess a patient’s personal situation and preferences and is designed to help patients prepare for medical consultations [8]. It includes a list of questions that patients can answer prior to these consultations. For severe AS, we are introducing a QPL with 4 key questions—covering daily living, goals/constraints, concerns and priorities—which can help patients define their treatment goals and engage more effectively in SDM (Fig. 1).

Integrating context information for shared decision-making

Context information about a patient’s living situation, social relations, daily activities, frailty and cognitive status is often missing in care pathways [9]. This information is essential for tailoring treatment to individual needs. For example, in many heart centres, the treatment plan is developed without the physical presence of the referring cardiologist and without seeing the patient in the outpatient clinic beforehand, leading to decisions that may not align with the patient’s unique situation [9, 10].
To address this gap, professionals should redesign information flows to include context data as a standard part of the care process. This information can be obtained from other professionals involved in the patient journey, such as general practitioners and geriatricians, or may be collected by the referring cardiologist in collaboration with nurses and nurse practitioners. Context information to be shared should include 5 elements: the patient’s living situation, social relations, daily activities, G8 scale (for frailty) [11] and the Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) ([12]; Fig. 1). Standardised forms or digital tools can facilitate the collection and sharing of this information across the care pathway, ensuring that all professionals involved in the patient journey have access to relevant context data.

Conclusion

As the population ages, effective SDM for severe AS requires professionals to prioritise understanding each patient’s goals, while patients must be supported in reflecting on their personal situations to define these goals. Redesigning information flows to include context data is crucial for ensuring that treatment decisions align with what matters most to patients. By addressing these key themes, SDM can bridge the gap between professional expertise and patients’ unique perspectives, thereby fostering patient-centred decisions.

Conflict of interest

J.J.A.M. van Beek-Peeters, M.C. Faes, M. Habibovic, B.J.L. Van den Branden, M.W.A. van Geldorp, N.J.M. van der Meer and M.M.N. Minkman declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Onze productaanbevelingen

Netherlands Heart Journal

Het Netherlands Heart Journal wordt uitgegeven in samenwerking met de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Cardiologie. Het tijdschrift is Engelstalig en wordt gratis beschikbaa ...

Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Cardiologie NVVC. Kwaliteitsbeleids- en kwaliteitsvisiedocument cardiologische zorg 2025. 2024. Cardiologie NVVC. Kwaliteitsbeleids- en kwaliteitsvisiedocument cardiologische zorg 2025. 2024.
2.
go back to reference ZorginstituutNederland. Kader Passende Zorg. 2022. ZorginstituutNederland. Kader Passende Zorg. 2022.
3.
go back to reference Otto CM, Kumbhani DJ, Alexander KP, et al. ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the Management of Adults With Aortic Stenosis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;2017:1313–46.CrossRef Otto CM, Kumbhani DJ, Alexander KP, et al. ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the Management of Adults With Aortic Stenosis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;2017:1313–46.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2020;2021:e35–e71. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2020;2021:e35–e71.
5.
go back to reference Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:561–632.CrossRefPubMed Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:561–632.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Van Beek-Peeters J, van Noort EHM, Faes MC, et al. Shared decision making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review. Heart. 2020;106:647–55.CrossRefPubMed Van Beek-Peeters J, van Noort EHM, Faes MC, et al. Shared decision making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review. Heart. 2020;106:647–55.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lauck SB, Lewis KB, Borregaard B, et al. “What Is the Right Decision for Me?” Integrating Patient Perspectives Through Shared Decision-Making for Valvular Heart Disease Therapy. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37:1054–63.CrossRefPubMed Lauck SB, Lewis KB, Borregaard B, et al. “What Is the Right Decision for Me?” Integrating Patient Perspectives Through Shared Decision-Making for Valvular Heart Disease Therapy. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37:1054–63.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Van Beek-Peeters J, van den Ende Z, Faes MC, et al. Decision making in treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a survey study in Dutch heart centres. Neth Heart J. 2022;30:423–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Van Beek-Peeters J, van den Ende Z, Faes MC, et al. Decision making in treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a survey study in Dutch heart centres. Neth Heart J. 2022;30:423–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Van Beek-Peeters J, van der Meer JBL, Faes MC, et al. Professionals’ views on shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis. Heart. 2022;108:558–64.CrossRefPubMed Van Beek-Peeters J, van der Meer JBL, Faes MC, et al. Professionals’ views on shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis. Heart. 2022;108:558–64.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference De Thézy A, Lafargue A, d’Arailh L, et al. Relevance of G8 scale in referring elderly patients with aortic stenosis requiring a TAVI for a geriatric consultation. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2017;15:357–63.PubMed De Thézy A, Lafargue A, d’Arailh L, et al. Relevance of G8 scale in referring elderly patients with aortic stenosis requiring a TAVI for a geriatric consultation. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2017;15:357–63.PubMed
12.
go back to reference O’Sullivan D, O’Regan NA, Timmons S. Validity and Reliability of the 6-Item Cognitive Impairment Test for Screening Cognitive Impairment: A Review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2016;42:42–9.CrossRefPubMed O’Sullivan D, O’Regan NA, Timmons S. Validity and Reliability of the 6-Item Cognitive Impairment Test for Screening Cognitive Impairment: A Review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2016;42:42–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Improving patient-centred decisions in severe aortic stenosis care
Auteurs
Judith J. A. M. van Beek-Peeters
Miriam C. Faes
Mirela Habibovic
Ben J. L. Van den Branden
Martijn W. A. van Geldorp
Nardo J. M. van der Meer
Mirella M. N. Minkman
Publicatiedatum
04-03-2025
Uitgeverij
BSL Media & Learning
Gepubliceerd in
Netherlands Heart Journal
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-025-01940-9