Skip to main content

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2010 | Special article

Arrogance and ignorance in assessing scientific quality in a multidisciplinary academic medical centre

Auteur: J. A. E. Spaan

Gepubliceerd in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Uitgave 6/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Extract

Apparently our managers and policy makers in the academic community feel the need for some objective measure of quality of research, obviously to be used as decision instrument at some point in time. Such a measure will therefore result in some feedback on the choices researchers will make to optimise their performance in terms of such a measure. It is therefore rather important to discuss publicly the quality of these measures and perform some sensitivity analysis with respect to the parameters that they contain. …
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Opthof T, Wilde AA. The Hirsch-index: a simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output of individual scientists: The case of Dutch professors in clinical cardiology. Neth Heart J. 2009;17:145-54. Opthof T, Wilde AA. The Hirsch-index: a simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output of individual scientists: The case of Dutch professors in clinical cardiology. Neth Heart J. 2009;17:145-54.
2.
go back to reference Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:16569-72. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:16569-72.
3.
go back to reference Van Kammen J, van Lier RAW, Gunning-Schepers LJ. Assessing scientific quality in a multidisciplinary academic medical centre. Neth Heart J. 2009;17:500. Van Kammen J, van Lier RAW, Gunning-Schepers LJ. Assessing scientific quality in a multidisciplinary academic medical centre. Neth Heart J. 2009;17:500.
4.
go back to reference Opthof T. Wilde AA. Assessment of scientific quality is complicated. Neth Heart J. 2009;17:501-2 Opthof T. Wilde AA. Assessment of scientific quality is complicated. Neth Heart J. 2009;17:501-2
5.
go back to reference Anonymous. Advice of the Research Council on the evaluation of the AMC research 2008. Internal report. Anonymous. Advice of the Research Council on the evaluation of the AMC research 2008. Internal report.
6.
go back to reference European Commission ISBN 92-79-01566-4. She figures: Women and Science, statistics and indicators, 2009. European Commission ISBN 92-79-01566-4. She figures: Women and Science, statistics and indicators, 2009.
7.
go back to reference Symonds MR, Gemmell NJ, Braisher TL, Gorringe KL, Elgar MA. Gender differences in publication output: towards an unbiased metric of research performance. PLoS One. 2006;1:e127. Symonds MR, Gemmell NJ, Braisher TL, Gorringe KL, Elgar MA. Gender differences in publication output: towards an unbiased metric of research performance. PLoS One. 2006;1:e127.
8.
go back to reference Spaan JA. Biomedical Engineering and bibliometric indices for scientific quality. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009;47:1219-20. Spaan JA. Biomedical Engineering and bibliometric indices for scientific quality. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009;47:1219-20.
9.
go back to reference Simons K. The misused impact factor. Science. 2008;322:165. Simons K. The misused impact factor. Science. 2008;322:165.
10.
go back to reference Laloë F, Mosseri R. Bibliometric evaluation of individual researchers: Not even right ... not even wrong. Europhysics News. 2009;40:27-9. Laloë F, Mosseri R. Bibliometric evaluation of individual researchers: Not even right ... not even wrong. Europhysics News. 2009;40:27-9.
Metagegevens
Titel
Arrogance and ignorance in assessing scientific quality in a multidisciplinary academic medical centre
Auteur
J. A. E. Spaan
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2010
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Uitgave 6/2010
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03091783