Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Manipulability and object recognition: is manipulability a semantic feature?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several lines of evidence exist, coming from neuropsychology, neuroimaging and behavioural investigations on healthy subjects, suggesting that an interaction might exist between the systems devoted to object identification and those devoted to online object-directed actions and that the way an object is acted upon (manipulability) might indeed influence object recognition. In this series of experiments on speeded word-to-picture-matching tasks, it is shown how the presentation of pairs of objects sharing similar manipulation causes greater interference with respect to objects sharing only visual similarity (experiment 1). Moreover, (experiment 2) it is shown how the repeated presentation of pairs of objects sharing a similar type of manipulation leads to a ‘negative’ serial position effect, with the number of errors increasing across presentations, a behaviour that is typically found in patients with access deficits to semantic representations. By contrast, the repeated presentation of pairs of objects sharing only visual similarity leads to an opposite ‘positive’ serial position effect, with errors decreasing across presentations. It is argued that a negative serial position effect is linked to interference occurring within the semantic system, and therefore that the way an object is manipulated is indeed a semantic feature, critical in defining manipulable object properties at a semantic level. To our knowledge, this constitutes the first direct evidence of manipulability being a semantic dimension. The results are discussed in the light of current models of semantic memory organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport D (1985) Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In: Eppstein S (ed) Current perspectives in dysphasia. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburg, pp 32–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Badre D, Wagner AD (2007) Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia 45:2883–2901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belke E, Meyer AS, Damian MF (2005) Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Q J Exp Psychol A 58:667–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertinetto PM, Burani C, Laudanna A, Marconi L, Ratti D, Rolando C, Thornton AM (2005) Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto (CoLFIS). http://www.istc.cnr.it/material/database/colfis/

  • Borgo F, Shallice T (2001) When living things and other ‘sensory quality’ categories behave in the same fashion: a novel category specificity effect. Neurocase 7:201–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boronat CB, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB, Tang K, Saffran EM, Kimberg DY, Detre JA (2005) Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 23:361–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brambati SM, Myers D, Wilson A, Rankin KP, Allison SC, Rosen HJ, Miller BL, Gorno-Tempini ML (2006) The anatomy of category-specific object naming in neurodegenerative diseases. J Cogn Neurosci 18:1644–1653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buxbaum LJ, Saffran EM (2002) Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain Lang 82:179–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campanella F, Shallice T (in press) Refractoriness and the healthy brain: a behavioural study on semantic access. Cognition. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.005

  • Campanella F, Mondani M, Skrap M, Shallice T (2009) Semantic access dysphasia resulting from left temporal lobe tumours. Brain 132:87–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campanella F, D’Agostini S, Skrap M, Shallice T (2010) Naming manipulable objects: anatomy of a category specific effect in left temporal tumours. Neuropsychologia 48:1583–1597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canessa N, Borgo F, Cappa SF, Perani D, Falini A, Buccino G, Tettamanti M, Shallice T (2008) The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: an FMRI study. Cereb Cortex 18:740–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Capitani E, Laiacona M, Mahon B, Caramazza A (2003) What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cogn Neuropsychol 20:213–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza A, Hillis A, Rapp B, Romani C (1990) The multiple semantics hypothesis: multiple confusions? Cogn Neuropsychol 7:161–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao LL, Martin A (2000) Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12:478–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins A, Loftus E (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol Rev 82:407–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creem SH, Proffitt DR (2001) Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:218–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Creem-Regehr SH, Lee JN (2005) Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special? Cogn Brain Res 22:457–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culham JC, Valyear KF (2006) Human parietal cortex in action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16:205–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A, Damasio H (1994) Cortical systems for retrieval of concrete knowledge: the convergence zone framework. In: Koch D, Davis J (eds) Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain. Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain. Computational neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio H, Grabowski TJ, Tranel D, Hichwa RD, Damasio AR (1996) A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature 380:499–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Renzi E, Lucchelli F (1994) Are semantic systems separately represented in the brain? The case of living category impairment. Cortex 30:3–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin JT, Gonnerman LM, Andersen ES, Seidenberg MS (1998) Category-specific semantic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: a computational account. J Cogn Neurosci 10:77–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis R, Tucker M (2000) Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. Br J Psychol 91(Pt 4):451–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson P, Cynader M (1995) Synaptic depression in visual cortex tissue slices: an in vitro model for cortical neuron adaptation. Exp Brain Res 106:145–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forde E, Humphreys G (1995) Refractory semantics in global aphasia: on semantic organisation and the access-storage distinction in neuropsychology. Memory 3:265–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forde E, Humphreys G (1997) A semantic locus for refractory behavior: implications of access- storage distinctions and the nature of semantic memory. Cogn Neuropsychol 14:367–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forde E, Humphreys GW (2007) Contrasting effects of repetition across tasks: implications for understanding the nature of refractory behavior and models of semantic memory. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 7:198–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gainotti G (2000) What the locus of brain lesion tells us about the nature of the cognitive defect underlying category-specific disorders: a review. Cortex 36:539–559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson J (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover S, Rosenbaum DA, Graham J, Dixon P (2004) Grasping the meaning of words. Exp Brain Res 154:103–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15:20–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, Carey DP (1991) A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349:154–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gotts SJ, Plaut DC (2002) The impact of synaptic depression following brain damage: a connectionist account of “access/refractory” and “degraded-store” semantic impairments. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2:187–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gotts SJ, Incidsa Della Rocchetta A, Cipolotti L (2002) Mechanisms underlying perseveration in aphasia: evidence from a single case study. Neuropsychologia 40:1930–1947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselmo ME (1995) Neuromodulation and cortical function: modeling the physiological basis of behavior. Behav Brain Res 67:1–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselmo ME, Bower JM (1992) Cholinergic suppression specific to intrinsic not afferent fiber synapses in rat piriform (olfactory) cortex. J Neurophysiol 67:1222–1229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helbig HB, Graf M, Kiefer M (2006) The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Exp Brain Res 174:221–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helbig HB, Steinwender J, Graf M, Kiefer M (2010) Action observation can prime visual object recognition. Exp Brain Res 200:251–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoenig K, Sim EJ, Bochev V, Herrnberger B, Kiefer M (2008) Conceptual flexibility in the human brain: dynamic recruitment of semantic maps from visual, motor, and motion-related areas. J Cogn Neurosci 20:1799–1814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard D, Nickels L, Coltheart M, Cole-Virtue J (2006) Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: experimental and computational studies. Cognition 100:464–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huber DE, O’Reilly R (2003) Persistence and accommodation in short-term priming and other perceptual paradigms: temporal segregation through synaptic depression. Cogn Sci 27:403–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber DE, Clark TF, Curran T, Winkielman P (2008) Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34:1305–1324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys GW, Riddoch M, Quinlan P (1988) Cascade processes in picture identification. Cogn Neuropsychol 5:67–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M, Decety J, Michel F (1994) Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia 32:369–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies E, Lambon Ralph MA (2006) Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison. Brain 129:2132–2147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies E, Baker SS, Doran M, Lambon Ralph M (2007) Refractory effects in stroke aphasia: a consequence of poor semantic control. Neuropsychologia 45:1065–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kellenbach M, Brett M, Patterson K (2003) Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. J Cogn Neurosci 15:30–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer M, Sim EJ, Liebich S, Hauk O, Tanaka J (2007) Experience-dependent plasticity of conceptual representations in human sensory-motor areas. J Cogn Neurosci 19:525–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky RL, Pellegrino J, McCloskey BP, Lederman SJ (1993) Cognitive representations of functional interactions with objects. Mem Cognit 21:294–303

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin A (2007) The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu Rev Psychol 58:25–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE (1985) Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. J Exp Psychol Gen 114:159–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myung JY, Blumstein SE, Sedivy JC (2006) Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition 98:223–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myung JY, Blumstein SE, Yee E, Sedivy JC, Thompson-Schill SL, Buxbaum LJ (2010) Impaired access to manipulation features in Apraxia: evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks. Brain Lang 112:101–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page E (1963) Ordered hypotheses for multiple treatments: a significance test for linear ranks. J Am Stat Assoc 58:216–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulvermuller F (2005) Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:576–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rees G, Friston K, Koch C (2000) A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5. Nat Neurosci 3:716–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger G (1978) Grind-1: First report on the Magic Grinder story comprehension project. Discourse Processes 1:267–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers TT, Lambon Ralph MA, Garrard P, Bozeat S, McClelland JL, Hodges JR, Patterson K (2004) Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychol Rev 111:205–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton G, McClelland JL (1986) A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds) Parallel distributed processing, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 45–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Saffran E, Schwartz M (1994) Of cabbages and things: semantic memory from a neuropsychological perspective—a tutorial review. In: Umiltà C, Moscovitch M (eds) Attention and performance 15: conscious and nonconscious information processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 507–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnur T, Schwartz M, Brecher A, Hodgson C (2006) Semantic interference during blocked cyclic naming: evidence from aphasia. J Memory Lang 54:199–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selden NR, Gitelman DR, Salamon-Murayama N, Parrish TB, Mesulam MM (1998) Trajectories of cholinergic pathways within the cerebral hemispheres of the human brain. Brain 121(Pt 12):2249–2257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shallice T (1993) Multiple semantics: whose confusion? Cogn Neuropsychol 10:251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Castellan N (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons W, Barsalou L (2003) The similarity-in-topography principle: reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cogn Neuropsychol 20:451–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith E, Medin D (1981) Categories and concepts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsodyks M, Markram H (1997) The neural code between cortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:719–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:830–846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E (1972) Episodic and semantic memory. In: Tulving E, Donaldson W (eds) Organization of memory. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler LK, Moss HE (2001) Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends Cogn Sci 5:244–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler LK, Moss HE, Durrant-Peatfield MR, Levy JP (2000) Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: a distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain Lang 75:195–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M (1982) Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle J, Goodale M, Mansfield R (eds) Analysis of visual behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela J, Song S, Turrigiano G, Nelson S (1999) Differential depression at excitatory and inhibitory synapses in visual cortex. J Neurosci 19:4293–4304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington EK, Cipolotti L (1996) Word comprehension. The distinction between refractory and storage impairments. Brain 119(Pt 2):611–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington EK, Leff A (2000) Jargon dyslexia: a single case study of intact reading comprehension in a jargon dysphasic. Neurocase 6:499–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington EK, McCarthy R (1983) Category specific access dysphasia. Brain 106(Pt 4):859–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington EK, McCarthy RA (1987) Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 110(Pt 5):1273–1296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington EK, Shallice T (1984) Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 107(Pt 3):829–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg J, van Turennout M, Martin A (2007) A neural system for learning about object function. Cereb Cortex 17:513–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Laurel Buxbaum and the second anonymous reviewer for the most helpful comments made on the draft of this paper.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Fabio Campanella

    Present address: Dipartimento di Filosofia, Università degli Studi di Udine, Via Margreth 3, 33100, Udine, Italy

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, International School for Advanced Studies SISSA-ISAS, via Bonomea 265, 34136, Trieste, Italy

    Fabio Campanella & Tim Shallice

  2. Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College, London, UK

    Tim Shallice

Authors
  1. Fabio Campanella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tim Shallice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Campanella.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 1.

Table 1 Stimuli used in experiments 1 and 2
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campanella, F., Shallice, T. Manipulability and object recognition: is manipulability a semantic feature?. Exp Brain Res 208, 369–383 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2489-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2489-7

Keywords