Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2015 | Original Article

The Work–Family Conflict Scale (WAFCS): Development and Initial Validation of a Self-report Measure of Work–Family Conflict for Use with Parents

Auteurs: Divna Haslam, Ania Filus, Alina Morawska, Matthew R. Sanders, Renee Fletcher

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development | Uitgave 3/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

This paper outlines the development and validation of the Work–Family Conflict Scale (WAFCS) designed to measure work-to-family conflict (WFC) and family-to-work conflict (FWC) for use with parents of young children. An expert informant and consumer feedback approach was utilised to develop and refine 20 items, which were subjected to a rigorous validation process using two separate samples of parents of 2–12 year old children (n = 305 and n = 264). As a result of statistical analyses several items were dropped resulting in a brief 10-item scale comprising two subscales assessing theoretically distinct but related constructs: FWC (five items) and WFC (five items). Analyses revealed both subscales have good internal consistency, construct validity as well as concurrent and predictive validity. The results indicate the WAFCS is a promising brief measure for the assessment of work–family conflict in parents. Benefits of the measure as well as potential uses are discussed.
vorige artikel The Effects of Positive and Negative Parenting Practices on Adolescent Mental Health Outcomes in a Multicultural Sample of Rural Youth
volgende artikel Psychiatric Diagnoses, Emotional–Behavioral Symptoms and Functional Outcomes in Adolescents Born Preterm with Very Low Birth Weights
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
The CFI, RMSEA and SRMR fit indices were all affected by the Satorra–Bentler scaling correction for the Chi square statistic.
 
2
For the chi square difference test a constrained model, in which the correlation between the factors is fixed at 1.00 is compared to the original model’s χ 2 where the correlation between the constructs is estimated freely. Significantly lower chi square value of the unconstrained model implies good discriminant validity.
 
3
For more information please contact the corresponding author.
 
Literatuur
1.
Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ (1985) Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad Manag Rev 10:76–88
2.
Byron K (2005) A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. J Vocat Behav 67:169–198CrossRef
3.
Casper WJ et al (2007) A review of research methods in IO/OB work–family research. J Appl Psychol 92:28–43CrossRefPubMed
4.
Frone MR, Russell M, Cooper ML (1992) Antecedents and outcomes of work–family conflict: testing a model of the work–family interface. J Appl Psychol 77:65–78CrossRefPubMed
5.
Eby LT et al (2005) Work and family research in IO/OB: content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). J Vocat Behav 66:124–197CrossRef
6.
Ruppanner L (2013) Conflict between work and family: an investigation of four policy measures. Soc Indic Res 110:327–347CrossRef
7.
Nomaguchi KM (2009) Change in work–family conflict among employed parents between 1977 and 1997. J Marriage Fam 71:15–32CrossRef
8.
Haslam DM, Sanders MR, Sofronoff K (2013) Reducing work–family conflict in teachers: a randomised controlled trial of workplace triple P. Sch Ment Health 5:70–82CrossRef
9.
Hartung D, Hahlweg K (2010) Strengthening parent well-being at the work–family interface: a German trial on workplace triple P. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 20:404–418CrossRef
10.
Mesmer-Magnus JR, Viswesvaran C (2005) Convergence between measures of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: a meta-analytic examination. J Vocat Behav 67:215–232CrossRef
11.
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York
12.
Carlson D, Kacmar KM, Williams LJ (2000) Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work–family conflict. J Vocat Behav 56:249–276CrossRef
13.
Frone MR, Yardley JK, Markel KS (1997) Developing and testing an integrative model of the work–family interface. J Vocat Behav 50:145–167CrossRef
14.
Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH (1990) How to develop and validate a new quality of life instrument. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life assessment in clinical trials. Raven Press, New York, pp 47–57
15.
Diefenbach MA, Weinstein ND, O’Reilly J (1993) Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility. Health Educ Res 8:181–192CrossRefPubMed
16.
Cummins RA, Gullone E (2000) Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: the case for subjective quality of life measurement. In: Second international conference on quality of life. National University of Singapore
17.
Matthews RA, Kath LM, Barnes-Farrell JL (2010) A short, valid, predictive measure of work–family conflict: item selection and scale validation. J Occup Health Psychol 15:75–90CrossRefPubMed
18.
Boyar SL et al (2006) Assessment of the validity of Netemeyer et al’.s (1996) WFC and FWC scales. Int J Confl Manag 17:34–44CrossRef
19.
Netemeyer RG, Boles JS, McMurrian R (1996) Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. J Appl Psychol 81:400–410CrossRef
20.
Kopelman RE, Greenhaus JH, Connolly TF (1983) A model of work family and interrole conflict: a construct validation study. Organ Behav Hum Perform 32:198–215CrossRef
21.
Thomas LT, Ganstr DC (1995) Impact of family supportive work variables on work–family conflict and strain : a control perspective. J Appl Psychol 80:6–15CrossRef
22.
Cohen RJ, Swerdlik M, Sturman E (2012) Psychological testing and assessment: an introduction to tests and measurement, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston
23.
Haslam DM, Morawska A, Sanders MR (2010). The Work–Family Conflict Scale (WAFCS). Parenting and Family Support Centre, The University of Queensland, Australia
24.
Kline P (1994) An easy guide to factor analysis. Taylor & Francis Group, London
25.
Sanders MR, Morawska A (2010) Family Background Questionnaire. Parenting and Family Support Centre, Brisbane
26.
Arnold DS et al (1993) The Parenting Scale: a measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychol Assess 5:137–144CrossRef
27.
Locke LM, Prinz RJ (2002) Measurement of parental discipline and nurturance. Clin Psychol Rev 22:895–929CrossRefPubMed
28.
Eyberg SM, Pincus D (1999) Eyberg child behavior inventory and Sutter–Eyberg student behavior inventory—revised: professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL
29.
Webster-Stratton C, Hammond M (1997) Treating children with early-onset conduct problems: a comparison of child and parent training interventions. J Consult Clin Psychol 65:93–109CrossRefPubMed
30.
Sanders MR, Woolley ML (2005) The relationship between maternal self-efficacy and parenting practices: implications for parent training. Child Care Health Dev 31(1):65–73CrossRefPubMed
31.
Muthèn LK, Muthèn BO (1998–20112) Mplus user’s guide. Author, Los Angeles, CA
32.
Stevens J (2002) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 4th edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
33.
Satorra A, Bentler PM (1994) Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: Eye AV, Clogg CC (eds) Latent variables analysis: applications for developmental research. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 399–419
34.
Browne MW, Cudeck R (1989) Single sample cross-validation indexes for covariance-structures. Multivar Behav Res 24:445–455CrossRef
35.
Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 6:1–55CrossRef
36.
Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. In: Methodology in the social sciences, 3rd edn. Guilford Press, New York, xvi, 427 p
37.
Brown TA (2006) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press, New York
38.
Schreiber JB et al (2006) Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res 99:323–337CrossRef
39.
Churchill GA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Mark Res 16(1):64–73CrossRef
40.
Gerbing DW, Anderson JC (1988) An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J Mark Res 25(2):186–192CrossRef
41.
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50CrossRef
42.
Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics Applied probability and statistics. Wiley, New York, xiv, 514 p
43.
Morawska A, Sanders MR (2007) Concurrent predictors of dysfunctional parenting and maternal confidence: implications for parenting interventions. Child Care Health Dev 33:757–767CrossRefPubMed
44.
Cinamon RG, Weisel A, Tzuk K (2007) Work–family conflict within the family. Crossover effects, perceived parent-child interaction quality, parental self-efficacy, and life role attributions. J Career Dev 34:79–100CrossRef
45.
Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods 7:422–445CrossRefPubMed
46.
Cheng Y, Yuan K-H, Liu C (2012) Comparison of reliability measures under factor analysis and item response theory. Educ Psychol Meas 72:52–67CrossRef
47.
48.
Hancock GR, Mueller RO (2001) Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In: Cudeck R, Toit SD, Sörbom D (eds) Factor analysis and structural equation modeling: a Festschrift honoring Karl G. Jöreskog. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL
49.
Enders CK (2010) Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press, New York
50.
Little TD et al (2002) To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 9:151–173CrossRef
51.
Kaplan D (1994) Estimator conditioning diagnostics for covariance structure models. Sociol Methods Res 23:200–229CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The Work–Family Conflict Scale (WAFCS): Development and Initial Validation of a Self-report Measure of Work–Family Conflict for Use with Parents
Auteurs
Divna Haslam
Ania Filus
Alina Morawska
Matthew R. Sanders
Renee Fletcher
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development / Uitgave 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-014-0476-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2015

Psychometric Evaluation of the Child PTSD Symptom Scale in Spanish and English

  • Original Article

Is Cyberbullying Related to Trait or State Anger?

  • Original Article

Psychiatric Diagnoses, Emotional–Behavioral Symptoms and Functional Outcomes in Adolescents Born Preterm with Very Low Birth Weights

  • Original Article

Fear-Related Confirmation Bias in Children: A Comparison Between Neutral- and Dangerous-Looking Animals

  • Original Article

Disordered Eating and its Association with Overweight and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Adolescents in Selected High Schools of Tehran

  • Original Article

The Effects of Positive and Negative Parenting Practices on Adolescent Mental Health Outcomes in a Multicultural Sample of Rural Youth

  • Original Article