Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-12-2008

Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice

Auteurs: Constance H. Fung, Ron D. Hays

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2008

Abstract

Background

Patient-reported measures include preferences and reports about care received, health behaviors, and outcomes of care (patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life). These measures are a core aspect of health care, but there is much to be learned about how to use them to improve clinical practice.

Method

We specify linkages among different patient-reported measures and focus upon the prospects and challenges for use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice.

Results

Patient-reported measures are important throughout the continuum of patient care. At the initial visit, patient-reported outcomes provide information about what is important to the patient, the patient’s current behaviors, and the patient’s baseline health-related quality of life. At subsequent visits, patient-reported outcomes help evaluate disease progression or regression as well as treatment effects.

Conclusions

Patient-reported measures can help clinicians target interventions that will improve patient outcomes of care. However, there are a number of challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice.

vorige artikel Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: proceedings of an International Society of Quality of Life Research conference

volgende artikel Patient-reported outcomes and the mandate of measurement

The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS). (2008). National Committee for Quality Assurance. Available from: http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/59/Default.aspx. Accessed 17 March 2008.

Department of Veterans Affairs. (2001). External Peer Review Program. VHA Directive 2001-015. Available from: http://www1.va.gov/VHAPUBLICATIONS/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=103. Accessed 17 March 2008.

Higginson, I. J., & Carr, A. J. (2001). Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 322(7297), 1297–1300. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1297.CrossRef

Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/06d-0044-gdl0001.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2008.

Makoul, G. (2001). Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: The Kalamazoo consensus statement. Academic Medicine, 76(4), 390–393. doi:10.1097/00001888-200104000-00021.PubMedCrossRef

Mauksch, L. B., Dugdale, D. C., Dodson, S., & Epstein, R. (2008). Relationship, communication, and efficiency in the medical encounter: Creating a clinical model from a literature review. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(13), 1387–1395. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.13.1387.PubMedCrossRef

Noel, P. H., Chris Frueh, B., Larme, A. C., Pugh, J. A., Noel, P. H., Williams, J. W., Jr., et al. (2005). Collaborative care needs and preferences of primary care patients with multimorbidity. Health Expectations, 8(1), 54–63. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00312.x.PubMedCrossRef

Calkins, D. R., Rubenstein, L. V., Cleary, P. D., Davies, A. R., Jette, A. M., Fink, A., et al. (1991). Failure of physicians to recognize functional disability in ambulatory patients. Annals of Internal Medicine, 114(6), 451–454.PubMed

McHorney, C. A. (1999). Health status assessment methods for adults: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Annual Review of Public Health, 20, 309–335. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.309.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., Brown, P. M., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.06.078.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Espallargues, M., Valderas, J. M., & Alonso, J. (2000). Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: A systematic review of its impact. Medical Care, 38(2), 175–186. doi:10.1097/00005650-200002000-00007.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Jaen, C. R., Stange, K. C., & Nutting, P. A. (1994). Competing demands of primary care: A model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. The Journal of Family Practice, 38(2), 166–171.PubMed

13.

Nutting, P. A., Baier, M., Werner, J. J., Cutter, G., Conry, C., & Stewart, L. (2001). Competing demands in the office visit: What influences mammography recommendations? The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 14(5), 352.PubMed

14.

Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient–physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(23), 3027. doi:10.1001/jama.288.23.3027.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Wasson, J., Hays, R., Rubenstein, L., Nelson, E., Leaning, J., Johnson, D., et al. (1992). The short-term effect of patient health status assessment in a health maintenance organization. Quality of Life Research, 1(2), 99–106. doi:10.1007/BF00439717.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Wasson, J. H., Stukel, T. A., Weiss, J. E., Hays, R. D., Jette, A. M., & Nelson, E. C. (1999). A randomized trial of the use of patient self-assessment data to improve community practices. Effective Clinical Practice, 2(1), 1–10.PubMed

17.

Greenhalgh, J., Long, A. F., & Flynn, R. (2005). The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: Lack of impact or lack of theory? Social Science & Medicine, 60(4), 833–843. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.022.CrossRef

18.

Kaplan, S. H., Kravitz, R. L., & Greenfield, S. (2000). A critique of current uses of health status for the assessment of treatment effectiveness and quality of care. Medical Care, 38(9, Suppl), II184–II191.PubMed

19.

Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powe, N. R., Wu, A. W., Wilson, M. H., Abboud, P. A., et al. (1999). Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(15), 1458–1465. doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Fihn, S. D., McDonell, M. B., Diehr, P., Anderson, S. M., Bradley, K. A., Au, D. H., et al. (2004). Effects of sustained audit/feedback on self-reported health status of primary care patients. The American Journal of Medicine, 116(4), 241–248. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.10.026.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Calkins, D. R., Rubenstein, L. V., Cleary, P. D., Davies, A. R., Jette, A. M., Fink, A., et al. (1994). Functional disability screening of ambulatory patients: A randomized controlled trial in a hospital-based group practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 9(10), 590–592. doi:10.1007/BF02599291.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Rubenstein, L. V., McCoy, J. M., Cope, D. W., Barrett, P. A., Hirsch, S. H., Messer, K. S., et al. (1995). Improving patient quality of life with feedback to physicians about functional status. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10(11), 607. doi:10.1007/BF02602744.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Donaldson, G. W., & Moinpour, C. M. (2002). Individual differences in quality-of-life treatment response. Medical Care, 40(6, Suppl), III39–III53. doi:10.1097/00005650-200206001-00007.PubMedCrossRef

24.

de Wit, M., Delemarre-van de Waal, H. A., Pouwer, F., Gemke, R. J., & Snoek, F. J. (2007). Monitoring health related quality of life in adolescents with diabetes: A review of measures. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 92(5), 434–439. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.102236.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Coons, S. J., Rao, S., Keininger, D. L., & Hays, R. D. (2000). A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. PharmacoEconomics, 17(1), 13–35. doi:10.2165/00019053-200017010-00002.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Garratt, A., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 324(7351), 1417. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1417.CrossRef

27.

Haywood, K. L., Garratt, A. M., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2005). Quality of life in older people: A structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments. Quality of Life Research, 14(7), 1651–1668. doi:10.1007/s11136-005-1743-0.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Hickey, A., Barker, M., McGee, H., & O’Boyle, C. (2005). Measuring health-related quality of life in older patient populations: A review of current approaches. PharmacoEconomics, 23(10), 971–993. doi:10.2165/00019053-200523100-00002.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Patel, K. K., Veenstra, D. L., & Patrick, D. L. (2003). A review of selected patient-generated outcome measures and their application in clinical trials. Value in Health, 6(5), 595–603. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.65236.x.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Phillips, R. L. (2005). Primary care in the United States: Problems and possibilities. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 331(7529), 1400–1402. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7529.1400.CrossRef

31.

Nelson, E. C., Wasson, J. H., Johnson, D. J., & Hays, R. D. (1996). Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment charts: Brief measures for clinical practice. Available from: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~coopproj/more_charts.html. Accessed 17 March 2008.

32.

Nelson, E. C., Landgraf, J. M., Hays, R. D., Wasson, J. H., & Kirk, J. W. (1990). The functional status of patients. How can it be measured in physicians’ offices? Medical Care, 28(12), 1111–1126. doi:10.1097/00005650-199012000-00001.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Berwick, D. M., James, B., & Coye, M. J. (2003). Connections between quality measurement and improvement. Medical Care, 41(1, Suppl), I30–I38. doi:10.1097/00005650-200301001-00004.PubMed

34.

Hemingway, H., Stafford, M., Stansfeld, S., Shipley, M., & Marmot, M. (1997). Is the SF-36 a valid measure of change in population health? Results from the Whitehall II Study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 315(7118), 1273–1279.

Titel: Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice
Auteurs: Constance H. Fung
Ron D. Hays
Publicatiedatum: 01-12-2008
Uitgeverij: Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2008
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9379-5

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusions

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2008

Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery

Patient-reported outcomes and the mandate of measurement

Search for a new editor-in-chief for quality of life research

Taking PROs and patient-centered care seriously: incremental and disruptive ideas for incorporating PROs in oncology practice

Lower visual acuity predicts worse utility values among patients with type 2 diabetes

Cognitive interviewing in the evaluation of fatigue items: Results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS)

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery

Patient-reported outcomes and the mandate of measurement

Search for a new editor-in-chief for quality of life research

Taking PROs and patient-centered care seriously: incremental and disruptive ideas for incorporating PROs in oncology practice

Lower visual acuity predicts worse utility values among patients with type 2 diabetes

Cognitive interviewing in the evaluation of fatigue items: Results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS)