Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-11-2013

Measurement bias of the SF-36 Health Survey in older adults with chronic conditions

Auteurs: Hongdao Meng, Bellinda L. King-Kallimanis, Amber Gum, Brenda Wamsley

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 9/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

The objectives of this study were to investigate the psychometric properties of the SF-36 in a sample of older adults with chronic conditions and to test whether measurement bias exists based on the levels of comorbidity.

Methods

Participants included were 979 cognitively intact older adults with comorbidities who were interviewed at their homes. We examined the psychometric properties of the SF-36 and conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to investigate the assumption of measurement invariance by the levels of comorbidity.

Results

Overall data quality was high and scaling assumptions were generally met with few exceptions. Floor and ceiling effects were present for the role-physical and role-emotional subscales. Using CFA, we found that a three-factor measurement model fits the data well. We identified two violations of measurement invariance. Results showed that participants with high comorbidity level place more emphasis on social functioning (SF) and bodily pain (BP) in relation to physical health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than those with low comorbidity level.

Conclusions

Measurement bias was present for the SF and BP components of the SF-36 physical HRQoL measure. Researchers should be cautious when considering the use of SF-36 in clinical studies among older adults with comorbidities.
vorige artikel Physical activity and health-related quality of life among adult women in Cali, Colombia: a cross-sectional study
volgende artikel Quality of life, human insecurity, and distress among Palestinians in the Gaza Strip before and after the Winter 2008–2009 Israeli war
Literatuur
1.
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 1179–1194.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Ware, J. E., Jr. (1998). Gandek B: Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 903–912.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Ware, J. E., Jr. (1992). Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Hayes, V., Morris, J., Wolfe, C., et al. (1995). The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: Is it suitable for use with older adults? Age and Ageing, 24, 120–125.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Parker, S. G., Peet, S. M., Jagger, C., et al. (1998). Measuring health status in older patients. The SF-36 in practice. Age and Ageing, 27, 13–18.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Rothrock, N. E., Hays, R. D., Spritzer, K., et al. (2010). Relative to the general US population, chronic diseases are associated with poorer health-related quality of life as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 1195–1204.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Yu, Y. F., Yu, A. P., & Ahn, J. (2007). Investigating differential item functioning by chronic diseases in the SF-36 health survey: A latent trait analysis using MIMIC models. Medical Care, 45, 851–859.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Anderson, G. F. (2005). Medicare and chronic conditions. New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 305–309.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Hill, S., Harries, U., & Popay, J. (1996). Is the short form 36 (SF-36) suitable for routine health outcomes assessment in health care for older people? Evidence from preliminary work in community based health services in England. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 50, 94–98.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Mallinson, S. (1998). The Short-Form 36 and older people: some problems encountered when using postal administration. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52, 324–328.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Reuben, D. B., Valle, L. A., Hays, R. D., et al. (1995). Measuring physical function in community-dwelling older persons: A comparison of self-administered, interviewer-administered, and performance-based measures. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 43, 17–23.PubMed
12.
Lyons, R. A., Perry, H. M., & Littlepage, B. N. (1994). Evidence for the validity of the Short-form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. Age and Ageing, 23, 182–184.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Hobson, J. P., & Meara, R. J. (1997). Is the SF-36 health survey questionnaire suitable as a self-report measure of the health status of older adults with Parkinson’s disease? Quality of Life Research, 6, 213–216.PubMedCrossRef
14.
O’Mahony, P. G., Rodgers, H., Thomson, R. G., et al. (1998). Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients? Age and Ageing, 27, 19–22.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Stadnyk, K., Calder, J., & Rockwood, K. (1998). Testing the measurement properties of the Short Form-36 Health Survey in a frail elderly population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 827–835.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Walters, S. J., Munro, J. F., & Brazier, J. E. (2001). Using the SF-36 with older adults: A cross-sectional community-based survey. Age and Ageing, 30, 337–343.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1507–1515.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Ware, J. E., Jr. (1998). Gandek B: Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 945–952.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Meng, H., Wamsley, B. R., Friedman, B., et al. (2010). Impact of body mass index on the effectiveness of a disease management-health promotion intervention on disability status. American Journal of Health Promotion, 24, 214–222.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E., Mehr, D. R., et al. (1994). MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. The Journal of Gerontology, 49, M174–M182.CrossRef
21.
Cureton, E. E. (1966). Corrected item-test correlations. Psychometrika, 31, 93–96.CrossRef
22.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRef
23.
Lim, L. L., Seubsman, S. A., & Sleigh, A. (2008). Thai SF-36 health survey: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and validity in healthy men and women. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6, 52.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Keller, S. D., Ware, J. E., Jr, Bentler, P. M., et al. (1998). Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in ten countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1179–1188.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258.CrossRef
26.
Millsap, R. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York: Routledge.
27.
King-Kallimanis, B. L., Oort, F. J., Nolte, S., et al. (2011). Using structural equation modeling to detect response shift in performance and health-related quality of life scores of multiple sclerosis patients. Quality of Life Research, 20, 1527–1540.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Holms, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
29.
Ware, J., & Kosinski, M. (2001). SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A manual for users of version 1 (2nd ed.). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Inc.
30.
Oort, F. J., Visser, M. R., & Sprangers, M. A. (2005). An application of structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change in quality of life data from cancer patients undergoing invasive surgery. Quality of Life Research, 14, 599–609.PubMedCrossRef
31.
McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Jr, Lu, J. F., et al. (1994). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32, 40–66.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Gandek, B., Sinclair, S. J., Kosinski, M., et al. (2004). Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36 health survey in Medicare managed care. Health Care Financing Review, 25, 5–25.PubMed
33.
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. E. (2000). How to score version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Inc.
34.
McHorney, C. A. (1996). Measuring and monitoring general health status in elderly persons: Practical and methodological issues in using the SF-36 Health Survey. Gerontologist, 36, 571–583.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Alonso, J., Ferrer, M., Gandek, B., et al. (2004). Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: Results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Quality of Life Research, 13, 283–298.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Banks, P., Martin, C. R., & Petty, R. K. (2012). The factor structure of the SF-36 in adults with progressive neuromuscular disorders. Journal of Evaluation Clinical Practice, 18, 32–36.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Measurement bias of the SF-36 Health Survey in older adults with chronic conditions
Auteurs
Hongdao Meng
Bellinda L. King-Kallimanis
Amber Gum
Brenda Wamsley
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0373-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2013

Quality of life, human insecurity, and distress among Palestinians in the Gaza Strip before and after the Winter 2008–2009 Israeli war

Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review

  • Review

Strengthening the assessment of factorial invariance across population subgroups: a commentary on Varni et al. (2013)

  • Commentary

Reliability and validity of the English (Singapore) and Chinese (Singapore) versions of the Short-Form 36 version 2 in a multi-ethnic Urban Asian population in Singapore

  • Brief Communication

Pitfalls in subgroup analysis based on growth mixture models: a commentary on van Leeuwen et al. (2012)

  • Commentary

Measurement properties of the QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure and cross-cultural adaptations of the QuickDASH: a systematic review

  • Review