Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Mindfulness
Gepubliceerd in:

01-04-2015 | ORIGINAL PAPER

The Italian Adaptation of the Mindful Awareness Attention Scale and its Relation with Individual Differences and Quality of Life Indexes

Auteurs: Chiara A. Veneziani, Alberto Voci

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness | Uitgave 2/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS; Brown and Ryan, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84:822–848, 2003) measures individual differences in daily mindful states. This research aimed to create an Italian adaptation of the MAAS, to explore its psychometric characteristics and its divergent and convergent validity, and to assess its relation with quality of life indexes. Study 1 (overall N = 465; 197 males and 266 females; divided into two subsamples: n = 200; 89 males and 109 females; n = 265; 108 males and 157 females) showed that the Italian adaptation of the MAAS has good psychometric properties and that its scores are not affected by the participants’ gender. Furthermore, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis supported the expected single-factor structure. Study 2 (N = 211; 106 males and 99 females) confirmed the mono-factorial structure and showed that the Italian version of MAAS is unrelated to reflection and private self-consciousness, negatively related to rumination, and positively associated to two personality dimensions: emotional stability and conscientiousness. Finally, the Italian version of MAAS showed to be positively related to well-being, measured by the General Health Questionnaire (Goldberg, 1992), and negatively associated to personal distress, also when controlling for the effects of social desirability and of the individual differences considered in the validation process.
vorige artikel Moving Beyond Mindfulness: Defining Equanimity as an Outcome Measure in Meditation and Contemplative Research
volgende artikel Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) for Health Anxiety (Hypochondriasis): Rationale, Implementation and Case Illustration
Literatuur
Bobbio, A., & Manganelli, A. M. (2011). Measuring social desirability responding. A short version of Paulhus’ BIDR 6. Testing, Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18, 117–135.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.CrossRef
Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation models: Present and future. A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 139–168). Chicago: Scientific Software International.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Buddhadāsa, B. (1988). Mindfulness with breathing: A manual for serious beginners. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Borgogni, L. (1994). BFO. Big Five Observer. Firenze: O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali.
Chou, C. E., Bentler, P. M., & Satorra, A. (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for nonnormal data in covariance structure analysis: a Monte Carlo study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 347–357.CrossRefPubMed
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527. doi:10.​1037/​h0076760.CrossRef
Giluk, T. L. (2009). Mindfulness, big five personality, and affect: a meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 805–811. doi:10.1016j.paid.2009.06.026
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: the search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–166). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Goldberg, D. (1992). General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Windsor, UK: NFER – Nelson.
Gunaratana, H. (1993). Mindfulness in plain English. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hills, P., & Argyle, A. (2001). Emotional stability as a major dimension of happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1357–1364.CrossRef
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.​1080/​1070551990954011​8.CrossRef
Jermann, F., Billieux, J., Larøi, F., d’Argembeau, A., Bondolfi, G., Zermatten, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2009). Mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS): psychometric properties of the French translation and exploration of its relations with emotion regulation strategies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 506–514. doi:10.​1037/​a0017032.CrossRefPubMed
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL (Version 8.5) [Computer software]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(144), 156. doi:10.​1093/​clipsy.​bpg016.
Krasner, M. S., Epstein, R. M., Beckman, H., Suchman, A. L., Chapman, B., Mooney, C. J., & Quill, T. E. (2009). Association of an educational program in mindful communication with burnout, empathy, and attitudes among primary care physicians. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302, 1284–1293. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2009.​1384.CrossRefPubMed
Mackenzie, M. J., Carlson, L. E., & Speca, M. (2005). Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in oncology: rationale and review. Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine, 2, 139–145.CrossRef
MacKillop, J., & Anderson, E. J. (2007). Further psychometric validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 289–293. doi:10.​1007/​s10862-007-9045-1.CrossRef
Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (1996). Assessing goodness of fit: is parsimony always desirable? Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 364–390.CrossRef
Paulhus, D. (1998). Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS): the balanced inventory of desirable responding—7: user’s manual. North Tanawanda: Multi-Health Systems.
Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. F. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp. 125–154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Shapiro, S. L., Brown, K. W., & Biegel, G. (2007). Teaching self-care to caregivers: the effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on the mental health of therapists in training. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 1, 105–115. doi:10.​1037/​1931-3918.​1.​2.​105.CrossRef
Shapiro, S. L., Brown, K. W., Thoresen, C., & Plante, T. G. (2011). The moderation of mindfulness-based stress reduction effects by trait mindfulness: results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 267–277. doi:10.​1002/​jclp.​20761.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
The Italian Adaptation of the Mindful Awareness Attention Scale and its Relation with Individual Differences and Quality of Life Indexes
Auteurs
Chiara A. Veneziani
Alberto Voci
Publicatiedatum
01-04-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Mindfulness / Uitgave 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1868-8527
Elektronisch ISSN: 1868-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0270-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2015

State Mindfulness During Meditation Predicts Enhanced Cognitive Reappraisal

  • ORIGINAL PAPER

Meditation—It’s Not What You Think

  • ORTHOGONAL ROTATION IN CONSCIOUSNESS

Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention: History, Mechanisms of Action, and Effects

  • REVIEW PAPER

Addendum to: Holding the Heart of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction: Balancing Fidelity and Imagination When Adapting MBSR

  • ORIGINAL PAPER

Mindfulness in Clinician Therapeutic Relationships

  • ORIGINAL PAPER

Staying Present: Incorporating Mindfulness into Therapy for Dissociation

  • ORIGINAL PAPER