Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.
Gepubliceerd in:
01-02-2025 | Research
Number, size, and space associated in a common system by distinct mechanisms
Auteurs: Bihua Cao, Zhenwei Su, Fang Yi, Fuhong Li
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2025
Log in om toegang te krijgenshare
DELEN
Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)
-
Optie A:
-
Optie B:Deel de link per e-mail
Abstract
The spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect demonstrates that people respond faster to small numbers with their left hand and faster to large numbers with their right hand. The size congruity effect (SCE) refers to the fact that congruent trials between numerical values and physical sizes are faster than incongruent trials. Previous studies have found that the SNARC effect and SCE are independent when magnitudes or sizes are processed explicitly. This study aimed to explore whether number, size, and space are common and distinct mechanisms using an implicit parity judgment task. The results showed that the SNARC effect, SCE, and SNARC-like effect all co-existed. Furthermore, there was a significant interaction between the SNARC effect and SCE, in which the SNARC effect in the SCE-congruent condition was larger than in the SCE-incongruent condition, whereas SCE merely emerged in the SNARC-compatible trials. However, participants responded to small numbers in large size faster than to large numbers in small size with the left hand in SCE-incongruent trials, which reflected that number-space mapping (SNARC effect) was stronger than size-space mapping (SNARC-like effect). These findings provide new evidence for A Theory of Magnitude (ATOM), which suggests that number, size, and space are associated with a common generalized magnitude system through distinct mechanisms.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Literatuur
go back to reference Aben, B., Verguts, T., & Van den Bussche, E. (2017). Beyond trial-by-trial adaptation: A quantification of the time scale of cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000324CrossRefPubMed
Aben, B., Verguts, T., & Van den Bussche, E. (2017). Beyond trial-by-trial adaptation: A quantification of the time scale of cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000324CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Besner, D., & Coltheart, M. (1979). Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English. Neuropsychologia, 17(5), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(79)90053-8CrossRefPubMed
Besner, D., & Coltheart, M. (1979). Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English. Neuropsychologia, 17(5), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(79)90053-8CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bueti, D., & Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1525), 1831–1840. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0028
Bueti, D., & Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1525), 1831–1840. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0028
go back to reference Bulf, H., Cassia, M., V., & de Hevia, M. D. (2014). Are numbers, size and brightness equally efficient in orienting visual attention? Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study. Plos One, 9(6), e99499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099499CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Bulf, H., Cassia, M., V., & de Hevia, M. D. (2014). Are numbers, size and brightness equally efficient in orienting visual attention? Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study. Plos One, 9(6), e99499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099499CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Bulf, H., de Hevia, M. D., & Macchi Cassia, V. (2016). Small on the left, large on the right: Numbers orient visual attention onto space in preverbal infants. Developmental Science, 19(3), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12315
Bulf, H., de Hevia, M. D., & Macchi Cassia, V. (2016). Small on the left, large on the right: Numbers orient visual attention onto space in preverbal infants. Developmental Science, 19(3), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12315
go back to reference Cao, B., Zeng, X., Zhang, J., Wang, X., & Li, F. (2023). Stronger spatial bias induced more by numbers in mind than numbers in eye: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 179, 108565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108565CrossRefPubMed
Cao, B., Zeng, X., Zhang, J., Wang, X., & Li, F. (2023). Stronger spatial bias induced more by numbers in mind than numbers in eye: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 179, 108565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108565CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cohen Kadosh, R., Cohen Kadosh, K., Kaas, A., Henik, A., & Goebel, R. (2007). Notation-dependent and -independent representations of numbers in the parietal lobes. Neuron, 53(2), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.025CrossRefPubMed
Cohen Kadosh, R., Cohen Kadosh, K., Kaas, A., Henik, A., & Goebel, R. (2007). Notation-dependent and -independent representations of numbers in the parietal lobes. Neuron, 53(2), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.025CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cooney, S. M., Holmes, C. A., & Newell, F. N. (2021). Children’s spatial–numerical associations on horizontal, vertical, and sagittal axes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 209, 105169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105169
Cooney, S. M., Holmes, C. A., & Newell, F. N. (2021). Children’s spatial–numerical associations on horizontal, vertical, and sagittal axes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 209, 105169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105169
go back to reference Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The Mental Representation of Parity and Number Magnitude. 26.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The Mental Representation of Parity and Number Magnitude. 26.
go back to reference de Hevia, M.-D., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children. Cognition, 110(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.003
de Hevia, M.-D., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children. Cognition, 110(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.003
go back to reference Di Giorgio, E., Lunghi, M., Rugani, R., Regolin, L., Dalla Barba, B., Vallortigara, G., & Simion, F. (2019). A mental number line in human newborns. Developmental Science, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12801
Di Giorgio, E., Lunghi, M., Rugani, R., Regolin, L., Dalla Barba, B., Vallortigara, G., & Simion, F. (2019). A mental number line in human newborns. Developmental Science, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12801
go back to reference Didino, D., Breil, C., & Knops, A. (2019). The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect. Acta Psychologica, 196, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.04.008CrossRefPubMed
Didino, D., Breil, C., & Knops, A. (2019). The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect. Acta Psychologica, 196, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.04.008CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149CrossRefPubMed
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Faulkenberry, T. J., Cruise, A., Lavro, D., & Shaki, S. (2016). Response trajectories capture the continuous dynamics of the size congruity effect. Acta Psychologica, 163, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.010CrossRefPubMed
Faulkenberry, T. J., Cruise, A., Lavro, D., & Shaki, S. (2016). Response trajectories capture the continuous dynamics of the size congruity effect. Acta Psychologica, 163, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.010CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Feldman, A., Oscar-Strom, Y., Tzelgov, J., & Berger, A. (2019). Spatial–numerical association of response code effect as a window to mental representation of magnitude in long-term memory among hebrew-speaking children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 181, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.001CrossRefPubMed
Feldman, A., Oscar-Strom, Y., Tzelgov, J., & Berger, A. (2019). Spatial–numerical association of response code effect as a window to mental representation of magnitude in long-term memory among hebrew-speaking children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 181, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.001CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Felisatti, A., Laubrock, J., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2020). A biological foundation for spatial–numerical associations: The brain’s asymmetric frequency tuning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1477(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10/gq5s6qCrossRefPubMed
Felisatti, A., Laubrock, J., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2020). A biological foundation for spatial–numerical associations: The brain’s asymmetric frequency tuning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1477(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10/gq5s6qCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fias, W. (1996). The importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467996387552CrossRef
Fias, W. (1996). The importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467996387552CrossRef
go back to reference Fitousi, D., Shaki, S., & Algom, D. (2009). The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: The SNARC effect revisited. Perception & Psychophysics, 71(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.143CrossRef
Fitousi, D., Shaki, S., & Algom, D. (2009). The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: The SNARC effect revisited. Perception & Psychophysics, 71(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.143CrossRef
go back to reference Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.32CrossRefPubMed
Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.32CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gevers, W., Santens, S., Dhooge, E., Chen, Q., Van den Bossche, L., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2010). Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number–space interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(1), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017688CrossRefPubMed
Gevers, W., Santens, S., Dhooge, E., Chen, Q., Van den Bossche, L., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2010). Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number–space interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(1), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017688CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Giurfa, M., Marcout, C., Hilpert, P., Thevenot, C., & Rugani, R. (2022). An insect brain organizes numbers on a left-to-right mental number line. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(44), e2203584119. https://doi.org/10/gq3b99CrossRef
Giurfa, M., Marcout, C., Hilpert, P., Thevenot, C., & Rugani, R. (2022). An insect brain organizes numbers on a left-to-right mental number line. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(44), e2203584119. https://doi.org/10/gq3b99CrossRef
go back to reference Gökaydin, D., Brugger, P., & Loetscher, T. (2018). Sequential effects in SNARC. Scientific Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29337-2
Gökaydin, D., Brugger, P., & Loetscher, T. (2018). Sequential effects in SNARC. Scientific Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29337-2
go back to reference Gut, M., Szumska, I., Wasilewska, M., & Jaśkowski, P. (2012). Are low and high number magnitudes processed differently while resolving the conflict evoked by the SNARC effect? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 85(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.02.007CrossRefPubMed
Gut, M., Szumska, I., Wasilewska, M., & Jaśkowski, P. (2012). Are low and high number magnitudes processed differently while resolving the conflict evoked by the SNARC effect? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 85(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.02.007CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Harvey, B. M., Klein, B. P., Petridou, N., & Dumoulin, S. O. (2013). Topographic Representation of Numerosity in the human parietal cortex. Science, 341(6150), 1123–1126. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239052CrossRefPubMed
Harvey, B. M., Klein, B. P., Petridou, N., & Dumoulin, S. O. (2013). Topographic Representation of Numerosity in the human parietal cortex. Science, 341(6150), 1123–1126. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239052CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Heck, D. W., Boehm, U., Böing-Messing, F., Bürkner, P. C., Derks, K., Dienes, Z., Fu, Q., Gu, X., Karimova, D., Kiers, H. A. L., Klugkist, I., Kuiper, R. M., Lee, M. D., Leenders, R., Leplaa, H. J., Linde, M., Ly, A., Meijerink-Bosman, M., Moerbeek, M., & Hoijtink, H. (2022). A review of applications of the Bayes factor in psychological research. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000454CrossRefPubMed
Heck, D. W., Boehm, U., Böing-Messing, F., Bürkner, P. C., Derks, K., Dienes, Z., Fu, Q., Gu, X., Karimova, D., Kiers, H. A. L., Klugkist, I., Kuiper, R. M., Lee, M. D., Leenders, R., Leplaa, H. J., Linde, M., Ly, A., Meijerink-Bosman, M., Moerbeek, M., & Hoijtink, H. (2022). A review of applications of the Bayes factor in psychological research. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000454CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Henik, A., & Tzelgov, J. (1982). Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Memory & Cognition, 10(4), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202431CrossRef
Henik, A., & Tzelgov, J. (1982). Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Memory & Cognition, 10(4), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202431CrossRef
go back to reference Hurewitz, F., Gelman, R., & Schnitzer, B. (2006). Sometimes area counts more than number. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19599–19604. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609485103CrossRef
Hurewitz, F., Gelman, R., & Schnitzer, B. (2006). Sometimes area counts more than number. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19599–19604. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609485103CrossRef
go back to reference Leibovich, T., Katzin, N., Harel, M., & Henik, A. (2017). From sense of number to sense of magnitude: The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000960CrossRefPubMed
Leibovich, T., Katzin, N., Harel, M., & Henik, A. (2017). From sense of number to sense of magnitude: The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000960CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Macnamara, A., Keage, H. A. D., & Loetscher, T. (2018). Mapping of non-numerical domains on space: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 236(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5154-6CrossRefPubMed
Macnamara, A., Keage, H. A. D., & Loetscher, T. (2018). Mapping of non-numerical domains on space: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 236(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5154-6CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nan, W., Yan, L., Yang, G., Liu, X., & Fu, S. (2021). Two processing stages of the SNARC effect. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01506-5CrossRefPubMed
Nan, W., Yan, L., Yang, G., Liu, X., & Fu, S. (2021). Two processing stages of the SNARC effect. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01506-5CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nikolaev, A. R., Beck, A. K., Theobald, S., Lachmann, T., & van Leeuwen, C. (2020). Factoring in the spatial effects of symbolic number representation. Biological Psychology, 149, 107782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107782CrossRefPubMed
Nikolaev, A. R., Beck, A. K., Theobald, S., Lachmann, T., & van Leeuwen, C. (2020). Factoring in the spatial effects of symbolic number representation. Biological Psychology, 149, 107782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107782CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Núñez-Peña, M. I., Colomé, À., & González-Gómez, B. (2021). The Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect in highly math-anxious individuals: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 161, 108062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108062CrossRefPubMed
Núñez-Peña, M. I., Colomé, À., & González-Gómez, B. (2021). The Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect in highly math-anxious individuals: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 161, 108062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108062CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pfister, R., Schroeder, P. A., & Kunde, W. (2013). SNARC struggles: Instant control over spatial–numerical associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 39, 1953–1958. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032991CrossRefPubMed
Pfister, R., Schroeder, P. A., & Kunde, W. (2013). SNARC struggles: Instant control over spatial–numerical associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 39, 1953–1958. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032991CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus. Neuron, 44(3), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.014CrossRefPubMed
Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus. Neuron, 44(3), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.014CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 416–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 416–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
go back to reference Reike, D., & Schwarz, W. (2017). Exploring the origin of the number-size congruency effect: Sensitivity or response bias? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(2), 383–388. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1267-4
Reike, D., & Schwarz, W. (2017). Exploring the origin of the number-size congruency effect: Sensitivity or response bias? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(2), 383–388. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1267-4
go back to reference Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83(2,Pt.1), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028573
Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83(2,Pt.1), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028573
go back to reference Ren, P., Nicholls, M. E. R., Ma, Y., & Chen, L. (2011). Size Matters: Non-numerical magnitude affects the spatial coding of response. Plos One, 6(8), 6.CrossRef
Ren, P., Nicholls, M. E. R., Ma, Y., & Chen, L. (2011). Size Matters: Non-numerical magnitude affects the spatial coding of response. Plos One, 6(8), 6.CrossRef
go back to reference Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Priftis, K., & Regolin, L. (2015). Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line. Science, 347(6221), 534–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1379CrossRefPubMed
Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Priftis, K., & Regolin, L. (2015). Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line. Science, 347(6221), 534–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1379CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Santens, S., Goossens, S., & Verguts, T. (2011). Distance in Motion: Response trajectories reveal the dynamics of Number Comparison. Plos One, 6(9), e25429. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025429CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Santens, S., Goossens, S., & Verguts, T. (2011). Distance in Motion: Response trajectories reveal the dynamics of Number Comparison. Plos One, 6(9), e25429. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025429CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Schwarz, W., & Heinze, H. (1998). On the interaction of numerical and size information in digit comparison: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 36(11), 1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00001-3CrossRefPubMed
Schwarz, W., & Heinze, H. (1998). On the interaction of numerical and size information in digit comparison: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 36(11), 1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00001-3CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schwarz, W., & Ischebeck, A. (2003). On the relative speed account of number-size interference in comparative judgments of numerals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(3), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.507
Schwarz, W., & Ischebeck, A. (2003). On the relative speed account of number-size interference in comparative judgments of numerals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(3), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.507
go back to reference Sellaro, R., Treccani, B., Job, R., & Cubelli, R. (2015). Spatial coding of object typical size: Evidence for a SNARC-like effect. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 79(6), 950–962. https://doi.org/10/f7xkmzCrossRefPubMed
Sellaro, R., Treccani, B., Job, R., & Cubelli, R. (2015). Spatial coding of object typical size: Evidence for a SNARC-like effect. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 79(6), 950–962. https://doi.org/10/f7xkmzCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.328CrossRef
Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.328CrossRef
go back to reference Shaki, S., Petrusic, W. M., & Leth-Steensen, C. (2012). SNARC effects with numerical and non-numerical symbolic comparative judgments: Instructional and cultural dependencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026729CrossRefPubMed
Shaki, S., Petrusic, W. M., & Leth-Steensen, C. (2012). SNARC effects with numerical and non-numerical symbolic comparative judgments: Instructional and cultural dependencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026729CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shomstein, S. (2012). Cognitive functions of the posterior parietal cortex: Top-down and bottom-up attentional control. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00038
Shomstein, S. (2012). Cognitive functions of the posterior parietal cortex: Top-down and bottom-up attentional control. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00038
go back to reference Sobel, K. V., Puri, A. M., & Faulkenberry, T. J. (2016). Bottom-up and top-down attentional contributions to the size congruity effect. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 78(5), 1324–1336. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1098-3CrossRef
Sobel, K. V., Puri, A. M., & Faulkenberry, T. J. (2016). Bottom-up and top-down attentional contributions to the size congruity effect. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 78(5), 1324–1336. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1098-3CrossRef
go back to reference Sokolowski, H. M., Fias, W., Mousa, A., & Ansari, D. (2017). Common and distinct brain regions in both parietal and frontal cortex support symbolic and nonsymbolic number processing in humans: A functional neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 146, 376–394. https://doi.org/10/f9vm9zCrossRefPubMed
Sokolowski, H. M., Fias, W., Mousa, A., & Ansari, D. (2017). Common and distinct brain regions in both parietal and frontal cortex support symbolic and nonsymbolic number processing in humans: A functional neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 146, 376–394. https://doi.org/10/f9vm9zCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Szűcs, D., & Soltész, F. (2007). Event-related potentials dissociate facilitation and interference effects in the numerical Stroop paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 45(14), 3190–3202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.013
Szűcs, D., & Soltész, F. (2007). Event-related potentials dissociate facilitation and interference effects in the numerical Stroop paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 45(14), 3190–3202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.013
go back to reference Szűcs, D., & Soltész, F. (2008). The interaction of task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus features in the number/size congruency paradigm: An ERP study. BrainResearch, 1190, 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.010
Szűcs, D., & Soltész, F. (2008). The interaction of task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus features in the number/size congruency paradigm: An ERP study. BrainResearch, 1190, 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.010
go back to reference Tudusciuc, O., & Nieder, A. (2007). Neuronal Population Coding of Continuous and Discrete Quantity in the Primate Posterior Parietal Cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(36), 14513–14518.
Tudusciuc, O., & Nieder, A. (2007). Neuronal Population Coding of Continuous and Discrete Quantity in the Primate Posterior Parietal Cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(36), 14513–14518.
go back to reference van Dijck, J.-P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations. Cognition, 119(1), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.013
van Dijck, J.-P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations. Cognition, 119(1), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.013
go back to reference Vellan, J. E., & Leth-Steensen, C. (2022). Separate processing mechanisms for spatial–numerical compatibility and numerical-size congruity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000270CrossRefPubMed
Vellan, J. E., & Leth-Steensen, C. (2022). Separate processing mechanisms for spatial–numerical compatibility and numerical-size congruity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000270CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Viarouge, A., & de Hevia, M. D. (2021). Can a single representational object account for different number-space mappings? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 750964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.750964CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Viarouge, A., & de Hevia, M. D. (2021). Can a single representational object account for different number-space mappings? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 750964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.750964CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Viarouge, A., & de Hevia, M. D. (2024). What makes different number-space mappings interact? Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01958-5CrossRefPubMed
Viarouge, A., & de Hevia, M. D. (2024). What makes different number-space mappings interact? Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01958-5CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E. J., van Doorn, J., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7CrossRef
Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E. J., van Doorn, J., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7CrossRef
go back to reference Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002CrossRefPubMed
Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Walsh, V. (2015). A Theory of Magnitude (R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker, Eds.; Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.64
Walsh, V. (2015). A Theory of Magnitude (R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker, Eds.; Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.64
go back to reference Wang, Q., An, B., Yue, H., Tao, W., & Shi, W. (2021). Interaction mechanism between location and sequence in letter cognition. Acta Psychologica, 217, 103329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103329CrossRefPubMed
Wang, Q., An, B., Yue, H., Tao, W., & Shi, W. (2021). Interaction mechanism between location and sequence in letter cognition. Acta Psychologica, 217, 103329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103329CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Weis, T., Theobald, S., Schmitt, A., van Leeuwen, C., & Lachmann, T. (2018). There’s a SNARC in the size Congruity Task. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Weis, T., Theobald, S., Schmitt, A., van Leeuwen, C., & Lachmann, T. (2018). There’s a SNARC in the size Congruity Task. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference White, S. L. J., Szűcs, D., & Soltész, F. (2011). Symbolic number: The integration of magnitude and spatial representations in children aged 6 to 8 years. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00392
White, S. L. J., Szűcs, D., & Soltész, F. (2011). Symbolic number: The integration of magnitude and spatial representations in children aged 6 to 8 years. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00392
go back to reference Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H. C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. 38.
Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H. C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. 38.
go back to reference Wu, H., Yang, X., Geng, L., Zhu, X., & Chen, Y. (2020). How do working memory and inhibition contribute to the SNARC effect in Chinese school-aged children? Cognitive Development, 56, 100959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100959CrossRef
Wu, H., Yang, X., Geng, L., Zhu, X., & Chen, Y. (2020). How do working memory and inhibition contribute to the SNARC effect in Chinese school-aged children? Cognitive Development, 56, 100959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100959CrossRef
go back to reference Wühr, P., & Seegelke, C. (2018). Compatibility between physical stimulus size and left-right responses: Small is left and large is right. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Wühr, P., & Seegelke, C. (2018). Compatibility between physical stimulus size and left-right responses: Small is left and large is right. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Xu, Y. (2018). The posterior parietal cortex in Adaptive Visual Processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 41(11), 806–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.07.012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Xu, Y. (2018). The posterior parietal cortex in Adaptive Visual Processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 41(11), 806–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.07.012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Yan, L., Yang, G., Nan, W., Liu, X., & Fu, S. (2021). The SNARC effect occurs in the response-selection stage. Acta Psychologica, 215, 103292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103292CrossRefPubMed
Yan, L., Yang, G., Nan, W., Liu, X., & Fu, S. (2021). The SNARC effect occurs in the response-selection stage. Acta Psychologica, 215, 103292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103292CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Zhang, P., Cao, B., & Li, F. (2021). SNARC effect modulated by central executive control: Revealed in a cue-based trisection task. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 85(6), 2223–2236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01407-zCrossRefPubMed
Zhang, P., Cao, B., & Li, F. (2021). SNARC effect modulated by central executive control: Revealed in a cue-based trisection task. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 85(6), 2223–2236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01407-zCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Zhang, P., Cao, B., & Li, F. (2022). The role of cognitive control in the SNARC effect: A review. PsyCh Journal, pchj.586. https://doi.org/10/gqn922
Zhang, P., Cao, B., & Li, F. (2022). The role of cognitive control in the SNARC effect: A review. PsyCh Journal, pchj.586. https://doi.org/10/gqn922
Metagegevens
- Titel
- Number, size, and space associated in a common system by distinct mechanisms
- Auteurs
-
Bihua Cao
Zhenwei Su
Fang Yi
Fuhong Li
- Publicatiedatum
- 01-02-2025
- Uitgeverij
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Gepubliceerd in
-
Psychological Research
/ Uitgave 1/2025
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772 - DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-02052-6
