Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Gepubliceerd in:

19-12-2016

Psychometric evaluation of the Condom Barriers and Motivations Scale (CBMS)

Auteurs: Sarit A. Golub, Kristi E. Gamarel

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 3/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

The Condom Barriers and Motivations Scale (CBMS) was developed to measure four distinct categories of barriers and motives to condom use, including: risk reduction motivations, pleasure reduction barriers, intimacy interference barriers, and partner pressure barriers. The CBMS is a 16-item scale with four items that correspond to each of these subscales. The CBMS was tested in two samples of gay and bisexual men. Results support the reliability and validity of the scale and its structure. Results also indicate that CBMS subscales are distinct from general measures of sexual wellbeing, personality factors, or relationship quality (i.e., discriminant validity) and are associated with self-reported condom use with different partner types (i.e., construct validity). The CBMS can be helpful in better understanding the dynamics of condom use in the context of pre-exposure prophylaxis decision-making, and can shed light on innovative approaches to enhance condom use as part of comprehensive HIV prevention and sexual health goals.
vorige artikel Self-determination theory and weight loss in a Diabetes Prevention Program translation trial
volgende artikel Engagement in health-promoting behaviors and patient–caregiver interdependence in dyads facing advanced cancer: an exploratory study
Literatuur
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 170–211.CrossRef
Alaei, K., Paynter, C. A., Juan, S. C., & Alaei, A. (2016). Using pre-exposure prophylaxis, losing condoms? Preexposure prophylaxis promotion may undermine safe sex. AIDS, 30(18), 2753–2756.PubMedCrossRef
Bauermeister, J. A., Carballo-Diéguez, A., Ventuneac, A., & Dolezal, C. (2009). Assessing motivations to engage in intentional condomless anal intercourse in HIV-risk contexts (“bareback sex”) among men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevention, 21, 156.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Berg, R. C. (2009). Barebacking: A review of the literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 754–764.PubMedCrossRef
Birrell, P. J., Owen, N. G., Delpech, V. C., et al. (2013). HIV incidence in men who have sex with men in England and Wales 2001-10: A nationwide population study. Lancet Infectious Diseases, 13, 313–318.PubMedCrossRef
Blechner, M. J. (2002). Intimacy, pleasure, risk, and safety: Discussion of Cheuvront’s high-risk sexual behavior in the treatment of HIV-negative patients. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Psychotherapy, 6, 27–33.CrossRef
Brown, I. S. (1984). Development of a scale to measure attitude toward the condom as a method of birth control. Journal of Sex Research, 120, 255–263.CrossRef
Burlew, A., Wilson, J., Montgomery, L., Peteet, B., Johnson, C., & Hatch-Maillette, M. (2015). Do masculinity and perceived condom barriers predict heterosexual HIV risk behaviors among black substance abusing men? Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 7, 4.
Campbell, A. N., Brooks, A. J., Pavlicova, M., Hu, M. C., Hatch-Maillette, M. A., Calsyn, D. A., et al. (2016). Barriers to condom use: Results for men and women enrolled in HIV risk reduction trials in outpatient drug treatment. Journal of HIV/AIDS and Social Services, 15, 130–146.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.CrossRef
Catania, J. A., Kegeles, S. M., & Coates, T. J. (1990). Towards an understanding of risk behavior: An AIDS risk reduction model (ARRM). Health Education Quarterly, 17, 53–72.PubMedCrossRef
CDC. (2014). Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States-2014 clinical practice guideline. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease and Control.
Champion, V. L. (1984). Instrument development for health belief model constructs. Advances in Nursing Science, 6(3), 73–87.PubMedCrossRef
Crosby, R., Graham, C. A., Yarber, W. L., Sanders, S. A., Milhausen, R., & Mena, L. (2016). Measures of attitudes toward communication about condom use: Their relationships with sexual risk behavior among young black men who have sex with men. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 43, 94–98.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Crosby, R., Milhausen, R., Yarver, W. L., Sanders, S. A., & Graham, C. A. (2008). Condom “turn offs” among adults: An exploratory study. International Journal of STD andAIDS, 19, 590–594.CrossRef
Crosby, R., Yarber, W. L., Sanders, S. A., & Graham, C. A. (2005). Condom discomfort and associated problems with their use among university students. Journal of American College Health, 54, 143–147.PubMedCrossRef
DuBois, L. Z., Macapagal, K. R., Rivera, Z., Prescott, T. L., Ybarra, M. L., & Mustankis, B. (2015). To have sex or not to have sex? An online focus group study of sexual decision making among experienced and inexperienced gay and bisexual adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 2027–2040.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Eaton, L. A., Driffin, D. D., Bauermeister, J., Smith, H., & Conway-Washington, C. (2015). Minimal awareness and stalled uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among risk, HIV-negative, Black men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 29, 423–429.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1992). Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychology Bulletin, 111, 455–474.CrossRef
Gakumo, C. A., Moneyham, L. D., Enah, C. C., & Childs, G. D. (2012). The moderating effect of sexual pressure on young urban women’s condom use. Research in Nursing and Health, 35, 4–14.PubMedCrossRef
Gamarel, K. E., & Golub, S. A. (2015). Intimacy motivations and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adoption intentions among HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) in romantic relationships. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49, 177–186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Gamarel, K. E., Reisner, S. L., Darbes, L. A., Hoff, C. C., Chakravarty, D., Nemoto, T., et al. (2016). Dyadic dynamics of HIV risk among transgender women and their primary male sexual partners: the role of sexual agreement types and motivations. AIDS Care, 28, 104–111.PubMedCrossRef
Goedel, W. C., Halkitis, P. N., Greene, R. E., & Duncan, D. T. (2016). Correlates of awareness of and willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men who use geosocial-networking smartphone applications in New York City. AIDS and Behavior, 20, 1435–1442.PubMedCrossRef
Golub, S. A., Starks, T. J., Payton, G., & Parsons, J. T. (2012). The critical role of intimacy in sexual risk behavior of gay and bisexual men. AIDS and Behavior, 16, 626–632.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Grady, W. R., Klepinger, D. H., Billy, J. O., & Tanfer, K. (1993). Condom characteristics: The perceptions and preferences of men in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives, 25, 67–73.PubMedCrossRef
Grant, R. M., Lama, J. R., Anderson, P. L., et al. (2010). Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 2587–2599.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Harawa, N. T., Williams, J. K., Ramamurthi, H. C., & Bingham, T. (2006). Perceptions towards condom use, sexual activity, and HIV disclosure among HIV-positive African American men who have sex with men: Implications for heterosexual transmission. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 682–694.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Hart, G. J., & Elford, J. (2010). Sexual risk behaviour of men who have sex with men: Emerging patterns and new challenges. Current Opinions in Infectious Diseases, 23, 39–44.CrossRef
Hau, K. T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Math and Statistical Psycholology, 57, 327–351.CrossRef
Helweg-Larsen, M., & Colliins, B. E. (1994). The UCLA Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale: Documenting the complex determinants of condom use in college students. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 224–237.CrossRef
Hensel, D. J., Stupiansky, N. W., Herbenick, D., & Dodge, B. (2012). Sexual pleasure during condom-protected vaginal sex among heterosexual men. Journal of Sex Medicine, 9, 1272–1276.CrossRef
Higgins, J. A., Tanner, A. E., & Janssen, E. (2009). Arousal loss related to safer sex and risk of pregnancy: Implications for women’s and men’s sexual health. Perspectives in Sex and Reproductive Health, 41, 150–157.CrossRef
Higgins, J. A., & Wang, Y. (2015). The role of young adults’ pleasure attitudes in shaping condom use. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 1329–1332.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Hill, B. J., Amick, E. E., & Sanders, S. A. (2011). Condoms and US college-aged men and women: Briefly assessing attitudes toward condoms and gender condom use behaviours. Sexual Health, 8, 372–377.PubMedCrossRef
Hoff, C. C., Campbell, C. K., Chakravarty, D., & Darbes, L. A. (2016). Relationship-based predictors of sexual risk for HIV among MSM couples: A systematic review of the literature. AIDS and Behavior, 20, 2873–2892.PubMedCrossRef
Jones, R. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Sexual Pressure Scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 281–293.PubMedCrossRef
Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factr analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications. Counseling Psychologist, 34, 648–718.CrossRef
Kalichman, S. C., & Rompa, D. (2001). The Sexual Compulsivity Scale: Further development and use with HIV-positive persons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 379–395.PubMedCrossRef
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.PubMedCrossRef
Liu, A. Y., Cohen, S. E., Vittinghoff, E., et al. (2015). Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection integrated with municipal- and community-based sexual health services. Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine, 176, 75–84.
MacKellar, D. A., Valleroy, L. A., Secura, G. M., Behel, S., Bingham, T., Celentano, D. D., et al. (2007). Perceptions of lifetime risk and actual risk for acquiring HIV among young men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 263–270.PubMedCrossRef
Madu, S. N., & Peltzer, K. (2003). Factor structure of condom attitudes among Black South African university students. Journal of Social and Behavioral Perspectives, 31, 265–274.CrossRef
Mimiaga, M. J., Goldhammer, H., Belanoff, C., Tetu, A. M., & Mayer, K. H. (2007). Men who have sex with men: Perceptions about sexual risk, HIV and sexually transmitted disease testing, and provider communication. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 34, 113–119.PubMedCrossRef
Morgan, E., Johnson, I., & Sigler, R. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions of women’s participation in unwanted sexual intercourse. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 515–522.CrossRef
Operario, D., Nemoto, T., Iwamoto, M., & Moore, T. (2011). Unprotected sexual behavior and HIV risk in the context of primary partnerships for transgender women. AIDS and Behavior, 15, 674–682.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Parsons, J. T., & Bimbi, D. S. (2007). Intentional unprotected anal intercourse among men who have sex with men: Barebacking—From behavior to identity. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 277–287.PubMedCrossRef
Parsons, J. T., Halkitis, P. N., Bimbi, D. S., & Borkowski, T. (2000). Perceptions of the benefits and costs associated with condom use and unprotected sex among late adolescent college students. Journal of Adolescences, 23, 377–391.CrossRef
Parsons, J. T., Halkitis, P. N., Wolitski, R., & Gomez, C. (2003). Correlates of sexual risk behavior among HIV-positive men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevevention, 15, 383–400.CrossRef
Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women’s consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 72–88.PubMed
Phillips, A. N., Cambiano, V., Nakagawa, F., et al. (2013). Increased HIV incidence in men who have sex with men despite high levels of ART-induced viral suppression: Analysis of an extensively documented epidemic. PLoS ONE, 8, e55312.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Pollack, J. A., & Halkitis, P. N. (2009). Environmental factors in relation to unprotected sexual behavior among gay, bisexual and other MSM. AIDS Education and Prevention, 21, 340–355.CrossRef
Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., Harlow, L. L., Rossi, J. S., & Velicer, W. F. (1994). The transtheoretical model of change and HIV prevention: A review. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 471–486.PubMedCrossRef
Randolph, M. E., Pinkerton, S. D., Bogart, L. M., Cecil, H., & Abramson, P. R. (2007). Sexual pleasure and condom use. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 844–848.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Reece, M., Herbenick, D., Hollub, A. V., et al. (2010). A psychometric assessment of the Multi-Factor Attitude Toward Condom Scale (MFACS). International Journal of STD and AIDS, 22, 119–129.
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measure commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.CrossRef
Sacco, W. P., Levine, B., Reed, D. L., & Thompason, K. (1991). Attitudes about condom use as an AIDS-relevant behavior: Their factor structure and relation to condom use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 265–272.CrossRef
Schumacker, E. S., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). Structural equation modeling. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Scott, H. M., & Klausner, J. D. (2016). Sexually transmitted infections and pre-exposure prophylaxis: Challenges and opportunities among men who have sex with men in the US. AIDS Research and Therapy, 13. doi:10.​1186/​s12981-016-0089-8.
Scott-Sheldon, L. A., & Johnson, B. T. (2006). Eroticizing creates safer sex: A research synthesis. Journal of Primary Prevevention, 27, 619–640.CrossRef
Snell, W. E., Fisher, T. D., & Walters, A. S. (1993). The multidimensional sexuality questionnaire: An objective self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality. Annals of Sex Research, 6, 27–55.CrossRef
Starks, T. J., Payton, G., Golub, S. A., Weinberger, C. L., & Parsons, J. T. (2014). Contexualizing condom use: Intimacy interference, stigma, and unprotected sex. Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 711–720.PubMedCrossRef
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Theodore, P. S., Durán, R., Antoni, M. H., Fernandez, M. I., & Schneiderman, N. (2004). Intimacy and sexual behavior among HIV-positive men-who-have-sex-with-men in primary relationships. AIDS and Behavior, 8, 321–331.PubMedCrossRef
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838.CrossRef
Yu, C. Y., & Muthen, B. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes (Technical Report). Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.
Metagegevens
Titel
Psychometric evaluation of the Condom Barriers and Motivations Scale (CBMS)
Auteurs
Sarit A. Golub
Kristi E. Gamarel
Publicatiedatum
19-12-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9815-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2017

A group-mediated physical activity intervention in older knee osteoarthritis patients: effects on social cognitive outcomes

  • BRIEF REPORT

Self-determination theory and weight loss in a Diabetes Prevention Program translation trial

Relations between adaptive and maladaptive pain cognitions and within-day pain exacerbations in individuals with fibromyalgia

Investigating the role of implicit prototypes in the prototype willingness model

A brief measure of reactance to health warnings

HIV-related shame and health-related quality of life among older, HIV-positive adults