Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

31-08-2024

Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures assessing recovery from hand fractures: a systematic review

Auteurs: Christos Mousoulis, Andrew D. Firth, Alanna Marson, Joel J. Gagnier

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 12/2024

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

To extensively review Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used to assess outcomes in persons with hand fractures in terms of their psychometric properties.

Methods

A COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodological review was conducted. Six electronic databases were searched (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL) for studies evaluating the psychometric properties of PROMs assessing recovery from hand fracture. Titles and abstracts, full text review, quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved after review by a third, expert reviewer. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the COSMIN checklist.

Results

This COSMIN review found that there were only 4 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria in terms of assessing measurement properties of PROMs in hand fractures. Only the construct validity of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), the Quick DASH (QDASH) and the Duruoz Hand Index (DHI), and the responsiveness of the DASH, the Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) were assessed in these studies. The overall rating of the studies was assessed as insufficient or indeterminate and quality of evidence was assessed as moderate, low, or very low by our team.

Conclusions

This study identified that there is a lack of evidence in the medical literature with regards to the measurement properties of PROMs in patients with hand fractures. The 4 included studies do not provide good quality data to support the use of these PROMS in patients with hand fractures. There is a need for more studies for more PROMs. This has important consequences for how outcomes will be measured in clinical studies in hand research and in clinical practice.
vorige artikel Twenty-five years of experience with patient-reported outcome measures in soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a systematic review
volgende artikel Significant individual change should be used as a lower bound for anchor based estimates of meaningful change on patient-reported outcome scores
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Karl, J., Olson, P., & Rosenwasser, M. (2015). The epidemiology of upper extremity fractures in the United States 2009. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 29(8), e242–e244.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Feehan, L., & Sheps, S. (2006). Incidence and demographics of hand fractures in British Columbia, Canada: A population-based study. J Hand Surg Am, 31(7), 68–74.CrossRef
3.
Macdermid, J., McClure, J., Richard, L., & Faber, K. (2021). Fracture profiles of a 4-year cohort of 266,324 first incident upper extremity fractures from population health data in Ontario. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22(1), 996.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Mousoulis, C., Karantana, A., Trickett, R., Thomas, K., & Leighton, P. (2023). ‘It’s just a finger isn’t it.’: Patients’ perspectives of recovery following finger fractures and participation in surgical trials - a qualitative interview study. British Medical Journal Open, 13(5).
5.
Alfort, H., Von Kieseritzky, J., & Wilcke, M. (2023). Finger fractures: Epidemiology and treatment based on 21341 fractures from the Swedish fracture register. PLoS One, 18(7).
6.
Dominguez-Prado, D., Ferradas-Garcia, L., Perez-Alfonso, E., Balvis-Balvis, P., & Lopez-Lopez, J. (2022). Epidemiology of bone fractures in the hand in adult population using the ICD-10 classification. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 89(4), 252–259.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Mousoulis, C., Thomas, K., Leighton, P., Deshmukh, S., Grindlay, D., & Karantana, A. (2020). Treatment interventions for hand fractures and joint injuries: A scoping review of randomized controlled trials. J Hand Surg Eur Vol, 45(2), 111–118.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Nelson, E., Eftimovska, E., Lind, C., Hager, A., Wasson, J., & Lindblad, S. (2015). Patient reported outcome measures in practice. Bmj.
9.
Black, N. (2013). Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. Bmj.
10.
Prinsen, C., Mokkink, L., Bouter, L., et al. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1147–1157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Gagnier, J., & Johnston, B. (2019). Poor quality patient reported outcome measures bias effect estimates in orthopaedic randomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 116, 36–38.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Pezold, M., Pusic, A., Cohen, W., et al. (2016). Defining a research agenda for patient-reported outcomes in surgery: Using a Delphi survey of stakeholders. Journal of the American Medical Association, 151(10), 930–936.
13.
Deshmukh, S., Kirkham, J., & Karantana, A. (2023). Developing a core outcome set for hand fractures and joint injuries in adults. Bone Jt Open, 4(2), 87–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Deshmukh, S., Mousoulis, C., Marson, B., Grindlay, D., & Karantana, A. (2021). Developing a core outcome set for hand fractures and joint injuries in adults: A systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol, 46(5), 488–495.CrossRef
15.
Marks, M. (2020). Which patient-reported outcomes shall we use in hand surgery? J Hand Surg Eur Vol, 45(1), 5–11.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Kleinlugtenbelt, Y., Nienhuis, R., Bhandari, M., Goslings, J., Poolman, R., & Scholtes, V. (2016). Are validated outcome measures used in distal radial fractures truly valid? A critical assessment using the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Bone Joint Res, 5, 153–161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Ziebart, M., & Macdermid, J. (2021). Measurement properties of outcome measures used to assess physical impairments in patients after distal radius fracture: A systematic review. Physical Therapy, 101(6), pzab080.CrossRefPubMed
18.
de Vet, H., Terwee, C., Mokkink, L., & Knol, D. (2011). Measurement in medicine: A practical guide. Cambridge University Press.
19.
Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Patrick, D., et al. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
Stratford, P., Westaway, M., & Binkley, J. (1995). Assessing disability and change on individual patients: A report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can, 47, 258–263.CrossRef
22.
Hudak, P., Amadio, P., Bombardier, C., et al. (1996). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and Hand). American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29, 602–608.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Akkaya, N., Basakci, W., Erel, S., et al. (2013). Are functional assessment questionnaires related with hand function tests in patients with nerve injury at the level of wrist and in patients with tendon injury/fracture at the level of the fingers? Turk J Phys Med Rehab, 59, 112–116.
24.
Chung, K., Pillsbury, M., Walters, M., & Hayward, R. (1998). Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 23, 575–587.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Macdermid, J., & Tottenham, V. (2004). Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. Journal of Hand Therapy, 17, 18–23.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Duruoz, M., Poraudeau, S., Fermanian, J., et al. (1996). Development and validation of a rheumatoid hand functional disability scale that assesses functional handicap. Journal of Rheumatology, 23, 1167–1172.PubMed
27.
Beaton, D., Wright, J., & Katz, J. (2005). Development of the QuickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 87, 1038–1046.PubMed
28.
Macdermid, J. (1996). Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. Journal of Hand Therapy, 9, 178–183.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Weinstock-Zlotnick, G., Page, C., Ghomrawi, H., & Wolff, A. (2015). Responsiveness of three Patient Report Outcome (PRO) measures in patients with hand fractures: A preliminary cohort study. Journal of Hand Therapy, 28, 403–411.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Arcidiacone, S., Panuccio, F., Tusoni, F., & Galeoto, G. (2022). A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). Hand Surg Rehabil, 41(5), 542–551.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Shafiee, E., Macdermid, J., Farzad, M., & Karbalaei, M. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-rated wrist (and Hand) evaluation (PRWE/PRWHE) measurement properties, translation, and/or cross-cultural adaptation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(22), 6551–6565.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Wiitavaara, B., & Florin, J. (2022). Content and psychometric evaluations of questionnaires for assessing physical function in people with arm-shoulder-hand disorders. A systematic review of the literature. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(24), 7575–7586.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Pathak, A., Wilson, R., Sharma, S., et al. (2022). Measurement properties of the patient-specific functional scale and its current uses: An updated systematic review of 57 studies using COSMIN guidelines. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 52(5), 262–275.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Novak, C., & Wiliams, M. (2015). Evaluation of the patient-specific functional scale in hand fractures and dislocations. HAND, 10, 85–87.CrossRefPubMed
35.
van Oosterom, F., Ettema, A., Mulder, P., & Hovius, S. (2007). Impairment and disability after severe hand injuries with multiple phalangeal fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 32A, 91–95.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures assessing recovery from hand fractures: a systematic review
Auteurs
Christos Mousoulis
Andrew D. Firth
Alanna Marson
Joel J. Gagnier
Publicatiedatum
31-08-2024
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 12/2024
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03768-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 12/2024

A pilot cross-sectional investigation of symptom clusters and associations with patient-reported outcomes in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Post COVID-19 Condition

  • Open Access

Chinese utility weights for the EORTC cancer-specific utility instrument QLU-C10D

Assessing the reliability of a novel cancer-specific multi-attribute utility instrument (FACT-8D) and comparing its validity to EQ-5D-5L in colorectal cancer patients

Experiences with healthcare navigation and bias among adult women with sickle cell disease: a qualitative study

  • Open Access

Quality of life impacts associated with comorbid insomnia and depression in adult population

  • Open Access

Evaluating anchor variables and variation in meaningful score differences for PROMIS® Pediatric measures in children and adolescents living with a rheumatic disease

  • Open Access