Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

22-03-2018

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of resilience scale specific to cancer: an item response theory analysis

Auteurs: Zeng Jie Ye, Mu Zi Liang, Hao Wei Zhang, Peng Fei Li, Xue Ren Ouyang, Yuan Liang Yu, Mei Ling Liu, Hong Zhong Qiu

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Objective

Classic theory test has been used to develop and validate the 25-item Resilience Scale Specific to Cancer (RS-SC) in Chinese patients with cancer. This study was designed to provide additional information about the discriminative value of the individual items tested with an item response theory analysis.

Methods

A two-parameter graded response model was performed to examine whether any of the items of the RS-SC exhibited problems with the ordering and steps of thresholds, as well as the ability of items to discriminate patients with different resilience levels using item characteristic curves.

Results

A sample of 214 Chinese patients with cancer diagnosis was analyzed. The established three-dimension structure of the RS-SC was confirmed. Several items showed problematic thresholds or discrimination ability and require further revision.

Conclusions

Some problematic items should be refined and a short-form of RS-SC maybe feasible in clinical settings in order to reduce burden on patients. However, the generalizability of these findings warrants further investigations.
vorige artikel Responsiveness of the anxiety/depression dimension of the 3- and 5-level versions of the EQ-5D in assessing mental health
volgende artikel Differential item functioning for items in Berger’s HIV Stigma Scale: an analysis of cohorts from the Indian, Swedish, and US contexts
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Blows, E., Bird, L., Seymour, J., & Cox, K. (2012). Liminality as a framework for understanding the experience of cancer survivorship: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(10), 2155–2164.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Deshields, T. L., Heiland, M. F., Kracen, A. C., et al. (2016). Resilience in adults with cancer: Development of a conceptual model. Psycho-Oncology, 25(1), 11–18.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Chen, E., & Miller, G. E. (2012). “Shift-and-persist” strategies: Why low socioeconomic status isn’t always bad for health. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 135–158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Ye, Z. J., Liu, Q. C., & Liang, M. Z. (2016). The exploratory evaluation of resilience model for breast cancer (RM-BC) among patients with breast cancer diagnosis. Medicine & Philosophy, 12(B), 75–79.
6.
Ye, Z. J., Liang, M. Z., Qiu, H. Z., et al. (2016). Effect of a multidiscipline mentor-based program, be resilient to breast cancer (BRBC), on female breast cancer survivors in mainland China-A randomized, controlled, theoretically-derived intervention trial. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 158(3), 509–522.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Ye, Z. J., Qiu, H. Z., Liang, M. Z., et al. (2017). Effect of a mentor-based, supportive-expressive program, be resilient to breast cancer, on survival in metastatic breast cancer—A randomized, controlled intervention trial. British Journal of Cancer, 117(10), 1486–1494.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems (vol. 1, p. 274). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
10.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory (p. 527). Orlando, FL: Sea Harbor Drive.
11.
Leung, C. M., Ho, S., & Kan, C. S. (1993). Evaluation of the Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychosomatics, 40, 29–34.PubMed
12.
Zheng, L. L., Wang, Y. L., & Li, H. C. (2003). The application of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in the general hospitals. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry Medicine, 5, 264–266.
13.
Baker, F. (2001). The basics of item response theory, ERIC clearinghouse on assessment and evaluation. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
14.
Embretson, S., & Reise, S. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists, L. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
15.
Samejima, F. (2005). Graded response model. In Encyclopedia Social Measurement (pp. 145–153). New York: SpringerCrossRef
16.
Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2000). RUMM2010: A windows interactive program for analysing data with Rasch unidimensional models for measurement. Perth, WA: RUMM Laboratory.
17.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park: Sage.
18.
Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5), S22–S31.CrossRefPubMed
19.
De Ayala, R. J., Kim, S. H., Stapleton, L. M., & Dayton, C. M. (1999). A reconceptualization of differential item functioning. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association; April 19–23.
20.
Wolfe, E. W., & Smith E. V. Jr. (2007). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II-validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(2), 204–234.PubMed
21.
Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (2012). Differential item functioning. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRef
22.
Ye, Z. J., Guan, H. J., Wu, L. H., et al. (2015). The resilience and psychosocial function among mainland Chinese parents of children with cancer: A cross-sectional survey. Cancer Nursing, 38(6), 466–474.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Scali, J., Gandubert, C., Ritchie, K., Soulier, M., Ancelin, M. L., & Chaudieu, I. (2012). Measuring resilience in adult women using the 10-items Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Role of trauma exposure and anxiety disorders. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e39879.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Ye, Z. J., Qiu, H. Z., Li, P. F., et al. (2017). Predicting changes in quality of life and emotional distress in Chinese patients with lung, gastric, and colon-rectal cancer diagnoses: The role of psychological resilience. Psycho-Oncology, 26(6), 829–835.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Gotay, C. C., Ransom, S., & Pagano, I. S. (2007). Quality of life in survivors of multiple primary cancers compared with cancer survivor controls. Cancer, 110(9), 2101–2109.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Ye, Z. J., Qiu, H. Z., Li, P. F., et al. (2017). Validation and application of the chinese version of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) among parents of children with cancer diagnosis. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 27, 36–44.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Ye, Z. J., Qiu, H. Z., Li, P. F., et al. (2017). Resilience model for parents of children with cancer in mainland China-An exploratory study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 27, 9–16.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Julious, S. A. (2010). Sample sizes for clinical trials. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
29.
Sébille, V., Hardouin, J. B., Le Néel, T., et al. (2010). Methodological issues regarding power of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT)-based approaches for the comparison of patient-reported outcomes in two groups of patients-a simulation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Draxler, C. (2010). Sample size determination for Rasch model tests. Psychometrika, 75, 708–724.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of resilience scale specific to cancer: an item response theory analysis
Auteurs
Zeng Jie Ye
Mu Zi Liang
Hao Wei Zhang
Peng Fei Li
Xue Ren Ouyang
Yuan Liang Yu
Mei Ling Liu
Hong Zhong Qiu
Publicatiedatum
22-03-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1835-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2018

The ‘new normal’: relativity of quality of life judgments in individuals with bipolar disorder—a qualitative study

Anxiety symptoms have a direct effect on oral health perception in young women

  • Brief Communication

Life for patients with myelofibrosis: the physical, emotional and financial impact, collected using narrative medicine—Results from the Italian ‘Back to Life’ project

Health-promoting behaviors benefit the mental health of cirrhotic outpatients

How does age affect the relationship between weight and health utility during the middle years of childhood?

  • Open Access

Effects of treatment, choice, and preference on health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)