Top

Gepubliceerd in:

28-05-2024

The dyadic associations among self-efficacy, dyadic coping, and health-related quality of life between high-risk pregnant women and spouses: a cross-sectional study

Auteurs: Mengjie Liu, Yu Fang, Mengshi Liu, Min Wu, Jingshuo Zhang, Tianchen Niu, Xiaoman Zhang

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 8/2024

Abstract

Aim

Health-related quality of life(HRQoL) is essential for high-risk pregnant women and their spouses. This study aimed to explore the dyadic associations (including actor and partner effects) among self-efficacy, dyadic coping, and HRQoL of high-risk pregnant women and their spouses and examine the mediating effect of dyadic coping.

Methods

This cross-sectional study recruited participants from two Grade A tertiary hospitals in China from October 2022 to September 2023. A questionnaire including the Chinese version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale, Dyadic Coping Inventory, and 12 Short Form Health Survey Scales was used for the survey. The actor-partner interdependence mediation model was constructed to test dyadic associations and mediating effects.

Results

In the actor effects, self-efficacy was positively associated with dyadic coping and HRQoL (P < 0.05). Regarding partner effects, pregnant women’s self-efficacy was positively associated with spouses’ dyadic coping and physical health (P < 0.05). Dyadic coping partially mediated the relationship between self-efficacy and HRQoL for both groups(P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The HRQoL of high-risk pregnant women and their spouses requires urgent attention. Enhancing self-efficacy and dyadic coping in these couples is related to their improved physical and mental health. Healthcare professionals should consider interactions between couples and include them together in perinatal care. Intervention programs for couples or families based on existing positive psychology and dyadic interventions may work together to improve the HRQoL of couples.

vorige artikel Health-related quality of life among older adults following acute hospitalization: longitudinal analysis of a randomized controlled trial

volgende artikel Examining tools for assessing the impact of chronic pain on emotional functioning in children and young people with cerebral palsy: stakeholder preference and recommendations for modification

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Holness, N. (2018). High-risk pregnancy. The Nursing Clinics of North America, 53(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2018.01.010.CrossRefPubMed

Li, H., Nawsherwan, Fan, C., Yin, S., Haq, I. U., Mubarik, S., & Hua, L. (2022). Changes in adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with advanced maternal age (AMA) after the enactment of China’s universal two-child policy. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 5048. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08396-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jin, X., Liu, M., Zhang, P., Zheng, L., & Qi, F. (2023). Subsequent fertility after cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23(1), 337. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05584-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Weiwen, H., Biyun, Y., & Hongqing, L. (2023). Occurrence Condition of High-risk Pregnancy and Related Influencing Factors in Pregnant Women after Two-child Policy, Chinese and Foreign Medical Research, 21(9), 133–136. https://doi.10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2023.09.034.

Rajbanshi, S., Norhayati, M. N., & Nik Hazlina, N. H. (2020). High-risk pregnancies and their association with severe maternal morbidity in Nepal: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One, 15(12), e0244072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244072.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Williamson, S. P., Moffitt, R. L., Broadbent, J., Neumann, D. L., & Hamblin, P. S. (2023). Coping, wellbeing, and psychopathology during high-risk pregnancy: A systematic review. Midwifery, 116, 103556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103556.CrossRefPubMed

Ansarzadeh, S., Salehi, L., Mahmoodi, Z., & Mohammadbeigi, A. (2020). Factors affecting the quality of life in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A path analysis model. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01293-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization (1995). Social science & medicine (1982), 41(10), 1403–1409. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8560308.

Karimi, M. (2016). J. Brazier (Ed.), Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and quality of life: What is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics 34 7 645–649 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Ishaq, R., Shoaib, M., Baloch, N. S., Sadiq, A., Raziq, A., Huma, Z. E., & Khan, A. H. (2021). Profile and predictors of maternal quality of life during physiological pregnancy: A cross-sectional analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 801035. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.801035.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Darwin, Z., Domoney, J., Iles, J., Bristow, F., Siew, J., & Sethna, V. (2020). Assessing the Mental Health of Fathers, other co-parents, and partners in the Perinatal period: Mixed methods evidence synthesis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 585479. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.585479.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15–28.CrossRef

13.

Chhabra, J., Li, W., & McDermott, B. (2022). Predictive factors for depression and anxiety in men during the Perinatal period: A mixed methods study. Am J Mens Health, 16(1), 15579883221079489. https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883221079489.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Jiménez-Picón, N., Romero-Martín, M., Ramirez-Baena, L., Palomo-Lara, J. C., & Gómez-Salgado, J. (2021). Systematic review of the relationship between couple Dyadic Adjustment and Family Health. Children (Basel Switzerland), 8(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/children8060491.

15.

Wickham, R. E., & Knee, C. R. (2012). Interdependence theory and the actor-partner interdependence model: Where theory and method converge. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312447897.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Sundström Poromaa, I., Comasco, E., Georgakis, M. K., & Skalkidou, A. (2017). Sex differences in depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95(1–2), 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23859.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Bodenmann, G. (1995). A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. Swiss J Psychol, 54(1), 34–49.

18.

Meyer, K., Patel, N., & White, C. (2021). The relationship between perceived support and depression in spousal care partners: A dyadic approach. Aging & Mental Health, 25(10), 1830–1838. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1836474.CrossRef

19.

Rapelli, G., Donato, S., Parise, M., Pagani, A. F., Castelnuovo, G., Pietrabissa, G., & Bertoni, A. (2022). Yes, I can (with you)! Dyadic coping and self-management outcomes in cardiovascular disease: The mediating role of health self-efficacy. Health and Social Care in the Community, 30(5), e2604–e2617. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13704.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Iwanowicz-Palus, G., Zarajczyk, M., Pięta, B., & Bień, A. (2019). Quality of Life, Social Support, Acceptance of illness, and self-efficacy among pregnant women with hyperglycemia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), 3941. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203941.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Karademas, E. C. (2022). A new perspective on dyadic regulation in chronic illness: The dyadic regulation connectivity model. Health Psychol Rev, 16(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2021.1874471.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Yurkiw, J., & Johnson, M. D. (2021). Perceived stress, supportive dyadic coping, and sexual communication in couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(5), 1729–1737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in Dyadic Data using the actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099.CrossRef

25.

Thompson, B. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. US Dept of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Project Directors’ Conference, 1998, Washington, DC, US; A previous version of this chapter was presented at the aforementioned conference and at the same annual conference held in 1999.

26.

Schwarzer, R., Jerusalem, M., Weinman, S., Wright, M., & Johnston (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. 35, 37.

27.

Zhang, J. X., & Schwarzer, R. (1995). Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: a Chinese adaptation of the general self-efficacy scale.

28.

Gmelch, S., Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., Ledermann, T., Steffen-Sozinova, O., & Striegl, K. (2008). Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI): A questionnaire assessing dyadic coping in couples. Zeitschrifte Fur Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research, 20(2), 185–202.CrossRef

29.

Xu, F., Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Li, Q., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). Validation of the Dyadic coping inventory with Chinese couples: Factorial structure, measurement invariance, and construct validity. Psychological Assessment, 28(8), e127–e140. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000329.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Jr, W. J., M, K., & SD, K. (1996). A 12-Item short-form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.CrossRef

31.

Lam, C., Tse, E., & Gandek, B. (2005). Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Quality of life research. An International Journal of Quality of life Aspects of Treatment care and Rehabilitation, 14(2), 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-0704-3.CrossRef

32.

Masjoudi, M., Khazaeian, S., Malekzadeh, S., & Fathnezhad-Kazemi, A. (2022). Health-promoting behaviors and intermediary social determinants of health in low and high-risk pregnant women: An unmatched case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22(1), 445. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04784-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

An, H., Chen, C., Du, R., Cheng, C., Wang, P., & Dong, S. (2021). Self-efficacy, psychological distress, and marital quality in young and middle-aged couples facing lymphoma: The mediating effect of dyadic coping. Psycho-Oncology, 30(9), 1492–1501. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5711.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Alves, S., Fonseca, A., Canavarro, M. C., & Pereira, M. (2020). Does Dyadic coping predict couples’ Postpartum Psychosocial Adjustment? A Dyadic Longitudinal Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 561091. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561091.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Alves, S., Milek, A., Bodenmann, G., Fonseca, A., Canavarro, M. C., & Pereira, M. (2019). Romantic attachment, dyadic coping, and parental adjustment across the transition to parenthood. Personal Relationships, 26(2), 286–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12278.CrossRef

36.

Brandao, T., Brites, R., Hipolito, J., Pires, M., & Nunes, O. (2020). Dyadic coping, marital adjustment and quality of life in couples during pregnancy: An actor-partner approach. J Reprod Infant Psychol, 38(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2019.1578950.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Chu, H. H., Lee, K. S., Lee, H., Chung, K., Shin, J. H., K. C., & Hwang, T. Y. (2019). Association of physical and psychological health status between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and their family caregivers. Health Care for Women International, 40(10), 1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2019.1617292.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Jia, P., Beibei, C., Ping, H., Yu, Z., Rui, L., Tingting, H., & Liangyu, B. (2023). Interaction between disease communication and dyadic coping in gastric cancer patients and their spouses. Journal of Nursing Science, 38(2), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2023.03.090.CrossRef

39.

Rusu, P. P., Nussbeck, F. W., Leuchtmann, L., & Bodenmann, G. (2020). Stress, dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction: A longitudinal study disentangling timely stable from yearly fluctuations. PLoS One, 15(4), e0231133. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231133.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Abdolalipour, S., Mohammad-Alizadeh Charandabi, S., Mashayekh-Amiri, S., & Mirghafourvand, M. (2023). The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on self-efficacy and fear of childbirth in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Journal of Affective Disorders, 333, 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.020.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Fergus, K., Tanen, A., Ahmad, S., Gardner, S., Warner, E., McLeod, D., & Periera, A. (2022). Treatment satisfaction with Couplelinks Online intervention to promote Dyadic coping in young couples affected by breast Cancer. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 862555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862555.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: The dyadic associations among self-efficacy, dyadic coping, and health-related quality of life between high-risk pregnant women and spouses: a cross-sectional study
Auteurs: Mengjie Liu
Yu Fang
Mengshi Liu
Min Wu
Jingshuo Zhang
Tianchen Niu
Xiaoman Zhang
Publicatiedatum: 28-05-2024
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 8/2024
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03692-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2024

Understanding the influence of different proxy perspectives in explaining the difference between self-rated and proxy-rated quality of life in people living with dementia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Open Access
Review

Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024

Open Access

Assessing and accounting for measurement in intensive longitudinal studies: current practices, considerations, and avenues for improvement

Open Access

Low resilience is associated with worse health-related quality of life in caregivers of service members and veterans with traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study

Children’s and adolescents’ perspectives on living with advanced cancer: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research

German adult population norm values of the short Warwick Edinburgh mental well-being scale (SWEMWBS)

Open Access

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

The dyadic associations among self-efficacy, dyadic coping, and health-related quality of life between high-risk pregnant women and spouses: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2024

Understanding the influence of different proxy perspectives in explaining the difference between self-rated and proxy-rated quality of life in people living with dementia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024

Assessing and accounting for measurement in intensive longitudinal studies: current practices, considerations, and avenues for improvement

Low resilience is associated with worse health-related quality of life in caregivers of service members and veterans with traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study

Children’s and adolescents’ perspectives on living with advanced cancer: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research

German adult population norm values of the short Warwick Edinburgh mental well-being scale (SWEMWBS)

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Understanding the influence of different proxy perspectives in explaining the difference between self-rated and proxy-rated quality of life in people living with dementia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024

Assessing and accounting for measurement in intensive longitudinal studies: current practices, considerations, and avenues for improvement

Low resilience is associated with worse health-related quality of life in caregivers of service members and veterans with traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study

Children’s and adolescents’ perspectives on living with advanced cancer: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research

German adult population norm values of the short Warwick Edinburgh mental well-being scale (SWEMWBS)