Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-09-2013 | Brief Communication

The psychometric testing of the Thai version of the health utilities index in patients with ischemic heart disease

Auteurs: Weena Saiguay, Phantipa Sakthong

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

The HEALTH UTILITIES INDEX® (HUI®) is a family of systems designed to measure utility scores of health-related quality of life for comprehensive health states. There are two current HUI systems: HUI2 and HUI3. Since no Thai version of self-administered HUI was available, the study objective was to translate and test the psychometric properties of the HUI self-complete Thai-language questionnaire in terms of practicality, reliability, validity and responsiveness. A convenience sample of 216 outpatients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) was selected. Mean age was 60.3 ± 7.2 (range 37–77) and 37.2 % were males. The floor and ceiling effects of the total scores for both HUI were <15 %. The intraclass correlation coefficients were from moderate to high for all attributes and total scores. The correlations of HUI2 and HUI3 when compared with the EQ-5D and MacNew global scores were high (Spearman’s rho > 0.5, P < 0.001). Discriminant validity was proved among three groups of different specific activity scale classes (P < 0.001). The effect size was the highest (0.92) in the patients reporting worsened health status assessed by the HUI2. In conclusion, both of the HUIs demonstrated conditionally satisfactory psychometric properties in the patients with IHD.
vorige artikel Comparison of the measurement properties between a short and generic instrument, the 5-level EuroQoL Group’s 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, and a longer and disease-specific instrument, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Breast (FACT-B), in Asian breast cancer patients
volgende artikel Measuring acceptance in irritable bowel syndrome: preliminary validation of an adapted scale and construct utility
Literatuur
1.
Lloyd-Jones, D., Adams, R. J., Brown, T. M., Carnethon, M., Dai, S., De Simone, G., et al. (2010). Executive summary: Heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 update: A report from the American heart association. Circulation, 121(7), 948–954.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Heidenreich, P. A., Trogdon, J. G., Khavjou, O. A., Butler, J., Dracup, K., Ezekowitz, M. D., et al. (2011). Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: A policy statement from the American heart association. Circulation, 123(8), 933–944.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Bundhamcharoen, K., Odton, P., Phulkerd, S., & Tangcharoensathien, V. (2011). Burden of disease in Thailand: Changes in health gap between 1999 and 2004. BMC Public Health, 11(53), 21.
4.
Thompson, D. R., & Yu, C. M. (2003). Quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease-I: Assessment tools. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1 (42).
5.
Mommersteeg, P. M., Denollet, J., Spertus, J. A., & Pedersen, S. S. (2009). Health status as a risk factor in cardiovascular disease: A systematic review of current evidence. American Heart Journal, 157(2), 208–218.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Guyatt, G. H., Feeny, D. H., & Patrick, D. L. (1993). Measuring health-related quality of life. Annals of Internal Medicine, 118(8), 622–629.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Coons, S. J., Rao, S., Keininger, D. L., & Hays, R. D. (2000). A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics, 17(1), 13–35.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Khanna, D., & Tsevat, J. (2007). Health-related quality of life—an introduction. American Journal of Managed Care, 13(Suppl 9), S218–S223.PubMed
9.
Furlong, W. J., Feeny, D. H., Torrance, G. W., & Barr, R. D. (2001). The health utilities index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 375–384.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Hatoum, H. T., Brazier, J. E., & Akhras, K. S. (2004). Comparison of the HUI3 with the SF-36 preference based SF-6D in a clinical trial setting. Value in Health, 7(5), 602–609.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Horsman, J., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., & Torrance, G. (2003). The health utilities index (HUI): Concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(54).
12.
Torrance, G. W., Feeny, D. H., Furlong, W. J., Barr, R. D., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Q. (1996). Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health utilities index mark 2. Medical Care, 34(7), 702–722.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Zhu, Z., DePauw, S., et al. (2002). Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40(2), 113–128.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Beth, D., & Robert, G. T. (2004). Basic and clinical biostatistics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book.
15.
Goldman, L., Hashimoto, B., Cook, E. F., & Loscalzo, A. (1981). Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: Advantages of a new specific activity scale. Circulation, 64(6), 1227–1234.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Dyer, M. T., Goldsmith, K. A., Sharples, L. S., & Buxton, M. J. (2010). A review of health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cardiovascular disease. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8(13).
17.
Dixon, T., Lim, L. L., & Oldridge, N. B. (2002). The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life instrument: Reference data for users. Quality of Life Research, 11(2), 173–183.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Dempster, M., Donnelly, M., & O’Loughlin, C. (2004). The validity of the MacNew Quality of Life in heart disease questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2(6).
19.
Hofer, S., Lim, L., Guyatt, G., & Oldridge, N. (2004). The MacNew Heart Disease health-related quality of life instrument: A summary. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2 (3).
20.
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Tourangeau, R. (1984). Cognitive science and survey methods. In T. B. Jabine, S. ML, T. JM and R. Tourangeau (Ed), Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines (pp. 73–100). Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
23.
Tongsiri, S. (2009). The Thai population-based preference scores for EQ-5D health states. Doctoral dissertation: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, UK.
24.
Lim, L. L., Valenti, L. A., Knapp, J. C., Dobson, A. J., Plotnikoff, R., Higginbotham, N., et al. (1993). A self-administered quality-of-life questionnaire after acute myocardial infarction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(11), 1249–1256.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Rosner, B. (2005). Fundamentals of biostatistics (6th ed.). Boston: Duxbury Press.
26.
27.
McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995). Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Research, 4(4), 293–307.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Pressler, S. J., Eckert, G. J., Morrison, G. C., Murray, M. D., & Oldridge, N. B. (2011). Evaluation of the health utilities index mark-3 in heart failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 17(2), 143–150.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Marra, C. A., Rashidi, A. R., Guy, D., Kopec, J. A., Abrahamowicz, M., Esdaile, J. M., et al. (2005). Are indirect utility measures reliable and responsive in rheumatoid arthritis patients? Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1333–1344.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Jones, C. A., Feeny, D., & Eng, K. (2005). Test-retest reliability of health utilities index scores: Evidence from hip fracture. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 21(3), 393–398.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Thoma, A., Sprague, S., Veltri, K., Duku, E., & Furlong, W. (2005). Methodology and measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments: A prospective study of patients undergoing breast reduction surgery. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3(44).
32.
Kaplan, R. M., Tally, S., Hays, R. D., Feeny, D., Ganiats, T. G., Palta, M., et al. (2011). Five preference-based indexes in cataract and heart failure patients were not equally responsive to change. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 497–506.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The psychometric testing of the Thai version of the health utilities index in patients with ischemic heart disease
Auteurs
Weena Saiguay
Phantipa Sakthong
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0297-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2013

Determinants of health-related quality of life in people with Parkinson’s disease: a path analysis

The validation of the Turkish version of Asthma Control Test

  • Brief Communication

Measuring acceptance in irritable bowel syndrome: preliminary validation of an adapted scale and construct utility

  • Brief Communication

Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study

  • Open Access

Impact of hepatitis B and C co-infection on health-related quality of life in HIV positive individuals

The effect of Tai Chi on health-related quality of life in people with elevated blood glucose or diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

  • Brief Communication