Skip to main content

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top

13-02-2025 | Empirical Research

The Wrong Stuff: Characteristics of Youth Involved in Mutual Antipathy Peer Relationships

Auteurs: Mary Page Leggett-James, Michael Yoho, Brett Laursen

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Mutual antipathies are characterized by reciprocated disliking. The current study identifies behavioral attributes that forecast participation in mutual antipathies. Participants were 313 (170 girls, 143 boys) Florida public school students (9–14 years old; Mage = 11.09, SDage = 0.90) who thrice nominated disliked classmates during a single school year (approximately 6.5 weeks apart). Behavioral attributes assayed in the fall semester identified those currently involved in mutual antipathies (N = 101 dyads) and those prospectively involved in new mutual antipathies (N = 124 dyads). Youth involved in existing and new mutual antipathies were characterized by (a) low peer-reported academic achievement and prosocial behavior (prospective only, p = 0.06), (b) high peer-reported disruptiveness and aggression, and (c) high self-reported emotional problems (concurrent only) and emotional reactivity (prospective only). Thus, youth who behave in unattractive ways are disliked and they tend to return the sentiment.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Bierman, K. (2004). Characteristics of rejected children. Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention strategies (pp. 17-32). Guilford. Bierman, K. (2004). Characteristics of rejected children. Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention strategies (pp. 17-32). Guilford.
go back to reference Bukowski, W. M., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Velásquez, A. M. (2012). Peer ratings. In Laursen B., Little T. D., & Card N. A. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 211–228). Guilford. Bukowski, W. M., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Velásquez, A. M. (2012). Peer ratings. In Laursen B., Little T. D., & Card N. A. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 211–228). Guilford.
go back to reference Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. Teachers College Press. Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. Teachers College Press.
go back to reference Graham, S. E., Willett, J. B., & Singer, J. D. (2013). Using discrete-time survival analysis to study event occurrence. In Newsom J., Jones R. N., & Hofer S. M. (Eds.), Longitudinal data analysis: A practical guide for researchers in aging, health, and social sciences (pp. 329–371). Routledge. Graham, S. E., Willett, J. B., & Singer, J. D. (2013). Using discrete-time survival analysis to study event occurrence. In Newsom J., Jones R. N., & Hofer S. M. (Eds.), Longitudinal data analysis: A practical guide for researchers in aging, health, and social sciences (pp. 329–371). Routledge.
go back to reference Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
go back to reference Parker, J. G., & Gamm, B. K. (2003). Describing the dark side of preadolescents’ peer experiences: Four questions (and data) on preadolescents’ enemies. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.89. Parker, J. G., & Gamm, B. K. (2003). Describing the dark side of preadolescents’ peer experiences: Four questions (and data) on preadolescents’ enemies. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​ccd.​89.
go back to reference Rodkin, P. C., Pearl, R., Farmer, T. W., & Van Acker, R. (2003). Enemies in the gendered society of middle childhood: Prevalence, stability, associations with social status, and aggression. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 102, 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.90.CrossRef Rodkin, P. C., Pearl, R., Farmer, T. W., & Van Acker, R. (2003). Enemies in the gendered society of middle childhood: Prevalence, stability, associations with social status, and aggression. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 102, 73–88. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cd.​90.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwartz, D., Hopmeyer-Gorman, A., Toblin, R. L., & Abou-ezzeddine, T. (2003). Mutual antipathies in the peer group as a moderating factor in the association between community violence exposure and psychosocial maladjustment. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 102, 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.88.CrossRef Schwartz, D., Hopmeyer-Gorman, A., Toblin, R. L., & Abou-ezzeddine, T. (2003). Mutual antipathies in the peer group as a moderating factor in the association between community violence exposure and psychosocial maladjustment. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 102, 39–54. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cd.​88.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The Wrong Stuff: Characteristics of Youth Involved in Mutual Antipathy Peer Relationships
Auteurs
Mary Page Leggett-James
Michael Yoho
Brett Laursen
Publicatiedatum
13-02-2025
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02145-4