Top

Gepubliceerd in:

12-05-2024 | Original Article

What Are You Ruminating About? The Development and Validation of a Content-Dependent Measure of Rumination

Auteurs: Christopher Marcin Kowalski, Donald H. Saklofske, Julie Aitken Schermer

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 5/2024

Abstract

Purpose

Existing measures of rumination assess ruminative thought without reference to the content of ruminations. The present studies describe the construction and validation of the Rumination Domains Questionnaire, a new measure of rumination which considers the domain specificity of ruminative thought.

Methods

A theoretical definition of rumination and domains of life were formulated through a literature review. Items were based on these domains, clinical/counselling case studies, and expert feedback. In Study 1, 106 preliminary items were reduced to 60 items through empirical analyses. In Study 2, the content and structural validity were assessed.

Results

Items were retained based on empirical criteria and the final scale demonstrated acceptable fit for both a 10-factor model and a hierarchical model. Content validity and criterion validity were supported, and both 10-factor and hierarchical models demonstrated acceptable fit.

Conclusions

Overall, we present strong evidence supporting the validity of the RDQ.

vorige artikel Intergenerational Transmission of Social Anxiety: The Role of Parents’ Fear of Negative Child Evaluation and Their Self-Referent and Child-Referent Interpretation Biases

volgende artikel A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Stepped Care Cognitive-behavioral Therapy for Internalizing Distress in Adults

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Kendall’s Tau B was used as the rumination items have four response categories and should be considered ordinal in level of measurement. Tau B is a non-parametric coefficient that assesses the relationship between an ordinal and a continuous variable. Evidence has suggested that Tau B may be a more accurate estimate of the correlation in population than Spearnan’s Rho (Howell, 1997). Jamovi (The Jamovi Project, 2021) was used to calculate Kendall’s Tau B.

These values were chosen based on their conversion to Pearson’s r. That is Tau B = .41 is approximately equal to r = .60 and Tau B = .19 is approximately equal to r = .29, according to Gilpin (1993).

van der Eijk and Rose (2015) found that Kaiser’s (1960) “eigenvalues greater than 1” rule, although criticized for over-dimensionalization, tends to work more precisely when using polychoric correlations, such as when the WLSMV estimator is used.

Kline (1994) suggested that loadings of .30 or higher can be regarded as salient loadings.

Advantages of using coefficient omega relative to using coefficient alpha are discussed thoroughly by Dunn et al. (2014), Goodboy and Martin (2020), Hayes and Coutts (2020), and Kalkbrenner (2021).

Omega can be calculated using ESEM, however research has found that regardless of the superior fit of ESEM models relative to CFA models, Omega should not differ substantially regardless of which type of model is used (Fu et al., 2022).

At the request of the editor, we have also examined with participants who only passed two attention checks removed from the sample. The sample size with these participants removed was reduced by only 9 participants and the removal of these participants did not meaningfully affect the results of the study.

A bifactor model with a general factor and 10 specific factors was also tested and provided strong fit indices but was not included here due to issues with interpretability of bifactor model fit (e.g., Murray & Johnson, 2013). Mplus output for these analyses is available on our OSF.

It should be noted that hypotheses for both study 1 and study 2 were posited prior to the collection of study 1 data.

The categorization of strength of correlation is based on Hemphill’s (2003) empirical guidelines, where a correlation of less than .20 is classified as weak, a correlation between .20 and .30 is classified as medium, and a correlation of stronger than .30 is categorized as strong.

Arnau, R. C., Meagher, M. W., Norris, M. P., & Bramson, R. (2001). Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with primary care medical patients. Health Psychology, 20, 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.20.2.112CrossRefPubMed

Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204CrossRef

Bardo, A. R. (2017). A life course model for a domains-of-life approach to happiness: Evidence from the United States. Advances in Life Course Research, 33, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2017.06.002CrossRef

Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018CrossRef

Basevits, P., Pushkar, D., Chaikelson, J., Conway, M., & Dalton, C. (2008). Age-related differences in worry and related processes. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 66, 283–305. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.66.4.bCrossRef

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the beck depression inventory-II. Psychological Corporation.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238CrossRefPubMed

Blasberg, S. A., Rogers, K. H., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). The Bidimensional Impression Management Index (BIMI): Measuring agentic and communal forms of impression management. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 23–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.862252CrossRef

Bowling, A. (1995). What things are important in people’s lives? A survey of the public’s judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life. Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1447–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00113-LCrossRef

Brouwer, D., Meijer, R. R., & Zevalkink, J. (2013). On the factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: G is the key. Psychological Assessment, 25, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029228CrossRefPubMed

Burns, G. L., Keortge, S., Formea, G., & Sternberger, L. G. (1996). Revision of the Padua Inventory of obsessive compulsive disorder symptoms: Distinctions between worry, obsessions, and compulsions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(95)00035-6CrossRefPubMed

Butler, L. D., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender differences in responses to depressed mood in a college sample. Sex Roles, 30, 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420597CrossRef

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The screen test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10CrossRefPubMed

Ciesla, J. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2007). Rumination, negative cognition, and their interactive effects on depressed mood. Emotion, 7, 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.555CrossRefPubMed

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309CrossRef

Clohessy, S., & Ehlers, A. (1999). PTSD symptoms, response to intrusive memories and coping in ambulance service workers. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466599162836CrossRefPubMed

Conway, M., Csank, P. A. R., Holm, S. L., & Blake, C. K. (2000). On Assessing individual differences in rumination on sadness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 404–425. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7503_04CrossRefPubMed

Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006CrossRef

Dar, K. A., & Iqbal, N. (2015). Worry and rumination in generalized anxiety disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder. The Journal of Psychology, 149, 866–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2014.986430CrossRefPubMed

De Jong-Meyer, R., Beck, B., & Riede, K. (2009). Relationships between rumination, worry, intolerance of uncertainty and metacognitive beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 547–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.010CrossRef

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE.

DiStefano, C., Liu, J., Jiang, N., & Shi, D. (2018). Examination of the weighted root mean square residual: Evidence for trustworthiness? Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1390394CrossRef

Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046CrossRefPubMed

Ehring, T., Zetsche, U., Weidacker, K., Wahl, K., Schonfeld, S., & Ehlers, A. (2011). The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ): Validation of a content-independent measure of repetitive negative thinking. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42, 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.12.003CrossRef

Eng, W., Coles, M. E., Heimberg, R. G., & Safren, S. A. (2005). Domains of life satisfaction in social anxiety disorder: Relation to symptoms and response to cognitive-behavioral therapy. Anxiety Disorders, 19, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.01.007CrossRef

Fu, Y., Wen, Z., & Wang, Y. (2022). A comparison of reliability estimation based on confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 82, 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644211008953CrossRefPubMed

Gilpin, A. R. (1993). Table for conversion of Kendall’s Tau to Spearman’s Rho within the context of measures of magnitude of effect for meta-analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053001007CrossRef

Goldberg, L. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.

Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. C. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007CrossRef

Goodboy, A. K., & Martin, M. M. (2020). Omega over alpha for reliability estimation of unidimensional communication measures. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44, 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1846135CrossRef

Goodwin, R. D., & Gotlib, I. H. (2004). Gender differences in depression: The role of personality factors. Psychiatry Research, 126, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2003.12.024CrossRefPubMed

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Gros, D. F., Simms, L. J., & Antony, M. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA) in friendship dyads. Behavior Therapy, 41, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2009.07.001CrossRefPubMed

Guay, F., Morin, A. J. S., Litalien, D., Valois, P., & Vallerand, R. J. (2015). Application of exploratory structural equation modeling to evaluate the academic motivation scale. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83, 51–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.876231CrossRef

Haase, A. M., Prapavessis, H., & Owens, R. G. (2013). Domain-specifity in perfectionism: Variations across domains of life. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 711–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.05.025CrossRef

Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629CrossRef

Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.78CrossRefPubMed

Hen, M., & Goroshit, M. (2018). General and life-domain procrastination in highly educated adults in Israel. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1173. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01173CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hong, R. Y. (2007). Worry and rumination: Differential associations with anxious and depressive symptoms and coping behavior. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2006.03.006CrossRefPubMed

Hopwood, C. J., & Donellan, M. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310361240CrossRefPubMed

Hopwood, C. J., & Good, E. W. (2019). Structure and correlates of interpersonal problems and sensitivities. Journal of Personality, 87, 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12437CrossRefPubMed

Howell, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology (4th ed.). Duxberry.

Hur, J., Gaul, K., & Berenbaum, H. (2019). Different patterns of attention bias in worry and rumination. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 43, 713–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-09993-4CrossRef

Hurley, A. E., Scandura, T. A., Schriesheim, C. A., Brannick, M. T., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R. J., & Williams, L. J. (1997). Exploring and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199711)18:63.0.CO;2-TCrossRef

Jackson, D. N. (1970). A sequential system for personality scale development. Current Topics in Clinical and Community Psychology, 2, 61–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-153502-5.50008-4CrossRef

Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality research form manual (3rd ed.). Sigma Assessment Systems. Revised.

Johnson, D. P., & Whisman, M. A. (2013). Gender differences in rumination: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 376–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.019CrossRef

Jónsdóttir, S. D., & Smári, J. (2000). Measuring obsessions without worry: Convergent and discriminant validity of the Revised Padua Inventory in an Icelandic student population. Scandinavian Journal of Behaviour Therapy, 29, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/028457100750066397CrossRef

Jose, P. E., Kramar, K., & Hou, Y. (2014). Does brooding rumination moderate the stress to depression relationship similarly for Chinese and New Zealand adolescents? Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 4, 114–127. https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v4n1p114CrossRef

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116CrossRef

Kalkbrenner, M. T. (2021). Alpha, omega, and H internal consistency reliability estimates: Reviewing these options and when to use them. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2021.1940118CrossRef

Kircanski, K., Thompson, R. J., Sorenson, J., Sherdell, L., & Gotlib, I. H. (2015). Rumination and worry in daily life: Examining the naturalistic validity of theoretical constructs. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 926–939. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614566603CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (5th ed., pp. 3–427). New York: The Guilford Press.

Kornacka, M., Buczny, J., & Layton, R. L. (2016). Assessing repetitive negative thinking using categorical and transdiagnostic approaches: A comparison and validation of three Polish language adaptations of self-report questionnaires. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kowalski, C. M., & Schermer, J. A. (2019). Hardiness, perseverative cognition, anxiety, and health related outcomes: A case for and against psychological hardiness. Psychological Reports, 122, 2096–2118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118800444CrossRefPubMed

Kulas, J. T., & Stachowski, A. A. (2009). Middle category endorsement in odd-numbered Likert response scales: Associated item characteristics, cognitive demands, and preferred meanings. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 489–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.005CrossRef

Kulas, J. T., & Stachowski, A. A. (2013). Respondent rationale for neither agreeing nor disagreeing: Person and item contributors to middle category endorsement intent on Likert personality indicators. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.014CrossRef

Lambie, G. W., Blount, A. J., & Mullen, P. R. (2017). Establishing content-oriented evidence for psychological assessments. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336930CrossRef

Lee, J., & Paek, I. (2014). In search of the optimal number of response categories in a rating scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 663–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282914522200CrossRef

Lyubomirsky, S., & Tkach, C. (2004). The consequences of dysphoric rumination. In C. Papagerorgiu & A. Wells (Eds.), Depressive rumination: Nature, theory and treatment (pp. 21–41). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713853.ch2CrossRef

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130CrossRef

Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness of fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391CrossRef

Marsh, H. W., Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Morin, A. J. S., & Nagengast, B. (2011). Methodological measurement fruitfulness of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM): New approaches to key substantive issues in motivation and engagement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 322–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406657CrossRef

Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Ruminative thoughts: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 9, pp. 1–47). Erlbaum.

Mccann, S. J. H., Stewin, L. L., & Short, R. H. (1991). Sex differences, social desirability, masculinity, and the tendency to worry. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 152, 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1991.9914687CrossRefPubMed

Mlačić, B., & Goldberg, L. (2007). An analysis of a cross-cultural personality inventory: The IPIP big-five factor markers in Croatia. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701267993CrossRefPubMed

Moberly, N. J., & Watkins, E. R. (2010). Negative affect and ruminative self-focus during everyday goal pursuit. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802696849CrossRefPubMed

Murray, A. L., & Johnson, W. (2013). The limitations of model fit in comparing the bi-factor versus higher-order models of human cognitive ability structure. Intelligence, 41, 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.004CrossRef

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide. Author.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Aldao, A. (2011). Gender and age differences in emotion regulation strategies and their relationship to depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.012CrossRef

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.115CrossRefPubMed

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.xCrossRefPubMed

Nota, J. A., & Coles, M. E. (2015). Duration and timing of sleep are associated with repetitive negative thinking. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9651-7CrossRef

Papageorgiou, C., & Wells, A. (2004). Nature, functions, and beliefs about depressive rumination. In C. Papagerorgiu & A. Wells (Eds.), Depressive rumination: Nature, theory and treatment (pp. 3–20). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713853.ch1CrossRef

Raines, A. M., Vidaurri, D. N., Portero, A. K., & Schmidt, N. B. (2017). Associations between rumination and obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.001CrossRef

Ramanaiah, N. V., Franzen, M., & Schill, T. (1983). A psychometric study of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 531–535. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4705_14CrossRefPubMed

Raykov, T. (1998). On the use of confirmatory factor analysis in personality research. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00159-1CrossRef

Ree, M. J., French, D., MacLeod, C., & Locke, V. (2008). Distinguishing cognitive and somatic dimensions of state and trait anxiety: Development and validation of the State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA). Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36, 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465808004232CrossRef

Roberts, B. W., & Robins, R. W. (2000). Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: The intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1284–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262009CrossRef

Roese, N. J., & Summerville, A. (2005). What we regret most… and why. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1273–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205274693CrossRefPubMed

Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 467–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9009-2CrossRef

Rubio-Aparicio, M., Núñez-Núñez, R. M., Sánchez-Meca, J., López-Pina, J. A., Marín-Martínez, F., & López-López, J. A. (2020). The Padua Inventory-Washington State University Revision of obsessions and compulsions: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1483378CrossRefPubMed

Sanavio, E. (1988). Obsessions and compulsions: The Padua Inventory. Behavioural Research and Therapy, 26, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(88)90116-7CrossRef

Schmitt, D. P., Realu, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168CrossRefPubMed

Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010CrossRefPubMed

Segerstrom, S. C., Tsao, J. C. I., Alden, L. E., & Craske, M. G. (2000). Worry and rumination: Repetitive thought as a concomitant and predictor of negative mood. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005587311498

Slaney, R. B., & Ashby, J. S. (1996). Perfectionists: Study of a criterion group. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb01885.xCrossRef

Slavish, D. C., Sliwinski, M. J., Smyth, J. M., Almeida, D. M., Liption, R. B., Katz, M. J., & Graham-Engeland, J. E. (2018). Neuroticism, rumination, negative affect, and sleep: Examining between- and within-person associations. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.023CrossRefPubMed

Smith, J. M., & Alloy, L. B. (2009). A roadmap to rumination: A review of the definition, assessment, and conceptualization of this multifaceted construct. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.003CrossRefPubMed

Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2019). Optimizing the length, width, and balance of a personality scale: How do internal characteristics affect external validity. Psychological Assessment, 31, 444–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000586CrossRefPubMed

Steer, R. A., Ball, R., Ranieri, W. F., & Beck, A. T. (1997). Further evidence for the construct validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with psychiatric outpatients. Psychological Reports, 80, 443–446. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.80.2.443CrossRefPubMed

Stöber, J. (1998). Reliability and validity of two widely-used worry questionnaires: Self-report and self-peer convergence. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 887–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00232-8CrossRef

Sutterlin, S., Paap, M. C. S., Babic, S., Kubler, A., & Vogele, C. (2012). Rumination and age: Some things get better. Journal of Aging Research, 2012, 267327. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/267327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tallis, F., Eysenck, M., & Mathews, A. (1992). A questionnaire for the measurement of nonpathological worry. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90038-QCrossRef

The jamovi project. (2021). Jamovi (Version 1.6) [Computer Software]. Retrieved February 7, 2022, from https://www.jamovi.org

Thomsen, D. K. (2006). The association between rumination and negative affect: A review. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 1216–1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930500473533CrossRef

Topper, M., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Watkins, E., & Ehring, T. (2014). Development and assessment of brief versions of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Ruminative Response Scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 402–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12052CrossRefPubMed

Trapnell, P. D., & Campbell, J. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the Five-Factor Model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 284–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.284CrossRefPubMed

Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Theory and Research, 27, 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023910315561CrossRef

Turner, S. M., Beidel, D. C., & Stanley, M. A. (1992). Are obsessional thoughts and worry different cognitive phenomena? Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(92)90117-QCrossRef

van der Eijk, C., & Rose, J. (2015). Risky business: Factor analysis of survey data—Assessing the probability of incorrect dimensionalisation. PLoS ONE, 10, e0118900. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118900CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Vilar, R., Liu, J. H., & Gouveia, V. V. (2020). Age and gender differences in human values: A 20-nation study. Psychology and Aging, 35, 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000448CrossRefPubMed

Wahl, K., Ertle, A., Bohne, A., Zurowski, B., & Kordon, A. (2011). Relations between a ruminative thinking style and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in non-clinical samples. Anxiety, Coping, & Stress, 24, 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2010.482985CrossRef

Watkins, E. (2004). Appraisals and strategies associated with rumination and worry. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.002CrossRef

Zalta, A. K., & Chambless, D. L. (2008). Exploring sex differences in worry with a cognitive vulnerability model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00459.xCrossRef

Titel: What Are You Ruminating About? The Development and Validation of a Content-Dependent Measure of Rumination
Auteurs: Christopher Marcin Kowalski
Donald H. Saklofske
Julie Aitken Schermer
Publicatiedatum: 12-05-2024
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 5/2024
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10482-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2024

Intolerance of Uncertainty is Associated with Heightened Arousal During Extinction Learning and Retention: Preliminary Evidence from a Clinical Sample with Anxiety and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders

Open Access
Original Article

Avoidant Automatic Thoughts are Associated with Task Avoidance and Inattention in the Moment

Original Article

The Regretted Actions and Inactions of Military Veterans and Psychological Problems

Original Article

The Interactive Effects of Rejection and Rumination on Diurnal Cortisol among Adolescent Girls: A Preliminary Daily Diary Study

Original Article

Hitting the Rewind Button: Imagining Analogue Trauma Memories in Reverse Reduces Distressing Intrusions

Open Access
Original Article

Choose Wisely! – Considering the Perceived Threat in the Selection of Trauma Film Clips May Improve the Ecological Validity of the Trauma Film Paradigm

Open Access
Brief Report

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

What Are You Ruminating About? The Development and Validation of a Content-Dependent Measure of Rumination

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2024

Intolerance of Uncertainty is Associated with Heightened Arousal During Extinction Learning and Retention: Preliminary Evidence from a Clinical Sample with Anxiety and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders

Avoidant Automatic Thoughts are Associated with Task Avoidance and Inattention in the Moment

The Regretted Actions and Inactions of Military Veterans and Psychological Problems

The Interactive Effects of Rejection and Rumination on Diurnal Cortisol among Adolescent Girls: A Preliminary Daily Diary Study

Hitting the Rewind Button: Imagining Analogue Trauma Memories in Reverse Reduces Distressing Intrusions

Choose Wisely! – Considering the Perceived Threat in the Selection of Trauma Film Clips May Improve the Ecological Validity of the Trauma Film Paradigm

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Intolerance of Uncertainty is Associated with Heightened Arousal During Extinction Learning and Retention: Preliminary Evidence from a Clinical Sample with Anxiety and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders

Avoidant Automatic Thoughts are Associated with Task Avoidance and Inattention in the Moment

The Regretted Actions and Inactions of Military Veterans and Psychological Problems

The Interactive Effects of Rejection and Rumination on Diurnal Cortisol among Adolescent Girls: A Preliminary Daily Diary Study

Hitting the Rewind Button: Imagining Analogue Trauma Memories in Reverse Reduces Distressing Intrusions

Choose Wisely! – Considering the Perceived Threat in the Selection of Trauma Film Clips May Improve the Ecological Validity of the Trauma Film Paradigm