Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

09-11-2018

Dimensional Pathological Personality Predicting Personality Disorders: Comparison of the DAPP-BQ and PID-5 Shortened Versions in a Spanish Community Sample

Auteurs: A. Aluja, L. F. García, L. Cuevas, I. Lucas

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 1/2019

Abstract

This study explored the psychometric properties of the shortened forms of The Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology (DAPP-BQ) and The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in a large cohort from a Spanish community and compared simultaneously the predictive power with regard to personality disorders (PDs) scores in the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE). The IPDE is a self-report inventory of 77 items. Each item measures a criterion and a dimensional score can be obtained for each personality disorder. Both shortened forms (named DAPP-90 and PID-5/SF, respectively) obtained a good structural validity and reliability. Linear regression analysis showed that both questionnaires were predictive of the PDs scores. DAPP-90 factors explained about 25% of PDs variance (37% of the PDs clusters). Facets slightly increased the percentages accounting for PDs variance and clusters to 31% and 43%, respectively. PID-5/SF factors, meanwhile, explained 23% of PDs and 33% of PDs clusters, while the facets accounted for 25% of PDs and 37% of clusters. It is concluded that both questionnaires were good instruments for measuring pathological personality, and predicted a similar part of the variance in PDs. However, given that neither the DAPP-90 nor the PID-5/SF accounted for all the variation in PDs, categorical classification of the broader set of PDs may continue to be desired by some researchers and practicing clinicians.

vorige artikel Reliability and Validity of the Thinking Skills Inventory, a Screening Tool for Cross-Diagnostic Skill Deficits Underlying Youth Behavioral Challenges

ANX = 110,131,173,190,255; COG = 52,70,102,245,287; SUB = 48,53,77,152,256; IPR = 148,171,284,285,290; AIN = 4,47,64,73,208; LAF = 24,28,41,54,278; OPP = 107,138,201,228,274; IAT = 80,112,189,221,229; SUS = 18,49,89,166,185; CAL = 114,194,206,236,281; COP = 109,145, 168,179,210; STS = 91,154,158,164,250; REJ = 45,82,120,217,243; NAR = 34,61,68,103,169; INP = 43,46,204,214,288; REX = 21,66,108,182,234; COM = 23,36,178,233,258; SHA = 60,72,86,186,266.

ANX: 79, 109, 130, 174; EML: 122, 138, 165, 181; HOS: 38, 92, 158, 170; PER: 60, 80, 100, 128; (Lack of) REA: 84r, 91r, 167r, 184r; SE1: 50, 127, 149, 175; SUB: 9, 15, 63, 202; ANH: 23, 26, 124, 157; DEP: 81, 151, 163, 169; INA: 89, 120, 145, 203;

SUS: 2, 117, 133, 190; WIT: 82, 136, 146, 186; ECC: 25, 70, 152, 205; PED: 44, 154, 192, 217; UBE: 106, 139, 150, 209;

ATS: 74, 173, 191, 211; CAL: 19, 153, 166, 183; DEC: 53, 134, 206, 218; GRA: 40, 114, 187, 197; MAN: 107, 125, 162, 219;

DIS: 118, 132, 144, 199; IMP: 4, 16, 17, 22; IRR: 129, 156, 160, 171; (Lack of) RIP: 105r, 123r, 176r, 196r; RIT: 39, 48, 67, 159.

Al-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016). A Psychometric Review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572.CrossRefPubMed

Aluja Fabregat, A., Blanch Plana, A., Blanco Calvo, E., Marti Guiu, M., & Balada, F. (2014). The dimensional assessment of personality psychopathology basic questionnaire: shortened versions item analysis. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17(102), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.109.CrossRef

Aluja, A., Cuevas, L., García, L. F., & García, O. (2007a). Zuckerman’s personality model predicts MCMI-III personality disorders. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(7), 1311–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.009.CrossRef

Aluja, A., García, L. F., Cuevas, L., & García, O. (2007b). The MCMI-III personality disorders scores predicted by the NEO-FFI-R and the ZKPQ-50-CC: A comparative study. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.1.58.CrossRefPubMed

American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (DSM-5). Arlington, VA: Author.CrossRef

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., de Vries, R. E., Hendrickse, J., & Born, M. P. (2012). The maladaptive personality traits of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in relation to the HEXACO personality factors and schizotypy/dissociation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(5), 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2012.26.5.641.CrossRefPubMed

Ashton, M. C., Paunonen, S. V., & Lee, K. (2014). On the validity of narrow and broad personality traits: A response to Salgado, Moscoso, and Berges (2013). Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.019.CrossRef

Bastiaens, T., Claes, L., Smits, D., De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., Rossi, G., et al. (2016). The construct validity of the Dutch personality inventory for DSM-5 personality disorders (PID-5) in a clinical sample. Assessment, 23(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115575069.CrossRefPubMed

Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729.CrossRefPubMed

Berghuis, H., Ingenhoven, T. J., van der Heijden, P. T., Rossi, G. M., & Schotte, C. K. (2017). Journal of Personality Disorders, 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2017_31_329.

Costa Jr., P. T., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. In P. T. Costa Jr. & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., Van Hiel, A., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2014). The hierarchical structure and construct validity of the PID-5 trait measure in adolescence. Journal of Personality, 82(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12042.CrossRefPubMed

De Fruyt, F., De Clercq, B., De Bolle, M., Wille, B., Markon, K., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment, 20(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113475808.CrossRefPubMed

Díaz-Batanero, C., Ramírez-López, J., Domínguez-Salas, S., Fernández-Calderón, F., & Lozano, Ó. M. (2017). Personality inventory for DSM-5–short form (PID-5-SF): Reliability, factorial structure, and relationship with functional impairment in dual diagnosis patients. Assessment, doi: 1073191117739980.

Doering, S., Renn, D., Hofer, S., Rumpold, G., Smrekar, U., Janecke, N., et al. (2007). Validation of the “assessment of DSM-IV personality disorders (ADP-IV)” questionnaire. Z Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, 53(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2007.53.2.111.CrossRef

Few, L. R., Miller, J. D., Rothbaum, A. O., Meller, S., Maples, J., Terry, D. P., et al. (2013). Examination of the section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(4), 1057. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034878.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fossati, A., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Borroni, S., & Maffei, C. (2013). Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment, 20(6), 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113504984.CrossRefPubMed

Fox, J. (2000). Nonparametric simple regression: Smoothing scatterplots. (no. 130) sage.

Gutiérrez-Zotes, J. A., Gutiérrez, F., Valero, J., Gallego, E., Baillés, E., Torres, X., et al. (2008). Structure of personality pathology in normal and clinical samples: Spanish validation of the DAPP-BQ. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22(4), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2008.22.4.389.CrossRefPubMed

Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., Wright, A. G., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). DSM-5 personality traits and DSM–IV personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(2), 424. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026656.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Huchzermeier, C., Geiger, F., Köhler, D., Bruß, E., Godt, N., Hinrichs, G., & Aldenhoff, J. B. (2008). Are there age-related effects in antisocial personality disorders and psychopathy? Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 15(4), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2007.10.002.CrossRefPubMed

Hyler, S. E. (1994). Personality diagnostic questionnaire-4. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.

Jopp, A. M., & South, S. C. (2015). Investigating the personality inventory for DSM-5 using self and spouse reports. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_153.CrossRefPubMed

Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Feeney, B. C. (2012). A simple guide to IBM SPSS: for version 20.0. Nelson education.

Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674.CrossRefPubMed

Kushner, S. C., Quilty, L. C., Tackett, J. L., & Bagby, R. M. (2011). The hierarchical structure of the dimensional assessment of personality pathology (DAPP-BQ). Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(4), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.4.504.CrossRefPubMed

Levy, P. (1968). Short-form tests: A methodological review. Psychological Bulletin, 69(6), 410–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025736.CrossRefPubMed

Livesley, W., & Jackson, D. (2009). Manual for the dimensional assessment of personality pathology—Basic questionnaire. Port Huron, MI: Sigma.

Livesley, W., Jackson, D., & Schroeder, M. (1992). Factorial structure of traits delineating personality disorders in clinical and general population samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101(3), 432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.101.3.432.CrossRefPubMed

Livesley, W., Jang, K., & Vernon, P. (1998). Phenotypic and genetic structure of traits delineating personality disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55(10), 941–948. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.55.10.941.CrossRefPubMed

Livesley, W. J., Jackson, D. N., & Schroeder, M. L. (1989). A study of the factorial structure of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 3(4), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1989.3.4.292.CrossRef

López-Ibor Aliño, J.J., Pérez Urdaníz, A., Rubio Larrosa, V. & World Health Organization. (1996). Examen internacional de los trastornos de la personalidad.. MEDITOR. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/41913

Loranger, A. W., Janca, A., & Sartorius, N. (1997). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders: The ICD-10 international personality disorder examination (IPDE): Cambridge University press.

Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). FACTOR 9.2 a comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and Semiconfirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621613487794.CrossRef

Maples, J. L., Carter, N. T., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Gore, W. L., Samuel, D. B., et al. (2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the personality inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1195. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000120.CrossRefPubMed

O'Connor, B. P. (2005). Graphical analyses of personality disorders in five-factor model space. European Journal of Personality, 19(4), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.558.CrossRef

Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 609–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199611)17:6<609::AID-JOB1828>3.0.CO;2-K.

Quilty, L. C., Ayearst, L., Chmielewski, M., Pollock, B. G., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). The psychometric properties of the personality inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample. Assessment, 20(3), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113486183.CrossRefPubMed

Rossier, J., Rigozzi, C., & Personality Across Culture Research Group (16 members). (2008). Personality disorders and the five-factor model among French speakers in Africa and Europe. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry / La Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 53(8), 534–544.CrossRef

Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Berges, A. (2013). Conscientiousness, its facets, and the prediction of job performance ratings: Evidence against the narrow measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12018.CrossRef

Saulsman, L. M., & Page, A. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1055–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2002.09.001.CrossRefPubMed

Schotte, C., De Doncker, D., Vankerckhoven, C., Vertommen, H., & Cosyns, P. (1998). Self-report assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders. Measurement of trait and distress characteristics: The ADP-IV. Psychological Medicine, 28(5), 1179–1188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798007041.CrossRefPubMed

Schotte, C. K., Doncker, D. A. D., Dmitruk, D., Mulders, I. V., D'Haenen, H., & Cosyns, P. (2004). The ADP-IV questionnaire: differential validity and concordance with the semi-structured interview. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(4), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.18.4.405.40348.CrossRefPubMed

Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.12.1.102.CrossRefPubMed

Van den Broeck, J., Bastiaansen, L., Rossi, G., Dierckx, E., De Clercq, B., & Hofmans, J. (2014). Hierarchical structure of maladaptive personality traits in older adults: Joint factor analysis of the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2013_27_114.CrossRefPubMed

van Kampen, D., de Beurs, E., & Andrea, H. (2008). A short form of the dimensional assessment of personality pathology-basic questionnaire (DAPP-BQ): The DAPP-SF. Psychiatry Research, 160(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2007.05.002.CrossRefPubMed

Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(2), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.19.2.110.62628.CrossRefPubMed

Widiger, T. A., Simonsen, E., Krueger, R., Livesley, W. J., & Verheul, R. (2005). Personality disorder research agenda for the DSM–V. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2005.19.3.315.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wright, A. G., Pincus, A. L., Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). An interpersonal analysis of pathological personality traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 19(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112446657.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yam, W. H., & Simms, L. J. (2014). Comparing criterion-and trait-based personality disorder diagnoses in DSM-5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123(4), 802. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037633.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zimmermann, J., Altenstein, D., Krieger, T., Holtforth, M. G., Pretsch, J., Alexopoulos, J., et al. (2014). The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: Findings from two German-speaking samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(4), 518–540. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_130.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Dimensional Pathological Personality Predicting Personality Disorders: Comparison of the DAPP-BQ and PID-5 Shortened Versions in a Spanish Community Sample
Auteurs: A. Aluja
L. F. García
L. Cuevas
I. Lucas
Publicatiedatum: 09-11-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-018-9706-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2019

Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of the Social Anxiety Questionnaire for Children in Adolescents with Social Anxiety Disorder

Trained Observers’ Ratings of Adolescents’ Social Anxiety and Social Skills within Controlled, Cross-Contextual Social Interactions with Unfamiliar Peer Confederates

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Dimensional Pathological Personality Predicting Personality Disorders: Comparison of the DAPP-BQ and PID-5 Shortened Versions in a Spanish Community Sample

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2019

Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of the Social Anxiety Questionnaire for Children in Adolescents with Social Anxiety Disorder

Validation of a Behavioral Measure of Acquiring and Discarding in Hoarding Disorder

Psychometric Properties and Clinical Utility of the Specific Phobia Questionnaire in an Anxiety Disorders Sample

No Trauma, no Problem: Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress in the Absence of a Criterion A Stressor

The Role of Sleep Quality in Associations between Peer Victimization and Internalizing Symptoms

Trained Observers’ Ratings of Adolescents’ Social Anxiety and Social Skills within Controlled, Cross-Contextual Social Interactions with Unfamiliar Peer Confederates

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of the Social Anxiety Questionnaire for Children in Adolescents with Social Anxiety Disorder

Validation of a Behavioral Measure of Acquiring and Discarding in Hoarding Disorder

Psychometric Properties and Clinical Utility of the Specific Phobia Questionnaire in an Anxiety Disorders Sample

No Trauma, no Problem: Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress in the Absence of a Criterion A Stressor

The Role of Sleep Quality in Associations between Peer Victimization and Internalizing Symptoms

Trained Observers’ Ratings of Adolescents’ Social Anxiety and Social Skills within Controlled, Cross-Contextual Social Interactions with Unfamiliar Peer Confederates