Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.
Gepubliceerd in:
2024 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk
31. Disposable and reusable instruments in endoscopic surgery
Auteurs : Myrthe M. M. Eussen, BSc, Dr. Martine Moossdorff, MD, PhD, Prof. Dr. Nicole D. Bouvy, MD PhD
Gepubliceerd in: The Technical Principles of Endoscopic Surgery
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
share
DELEN
Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)
-
Optie A:
-
Optie B:Deel de link per e-mail
Abstract
Surgical instruments for endoscopic surgery can be reusable, in which case they need to be sterilized after use, or disposable, in which case they are discarded after a single use. Reusable instruments can save costs and have a lower environmental impact, while disposable instruments may optimize sterility and have practical advantages. In this chapter, an in depth review is provided on the advantages and drawbacks of reusable and disposable instruments.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Steiner M, Boler T, Obhai G, Hubacher D. Assessment of a disposable trocar for insertion of contraceptive implants. Contraception. 2010;81(2):140–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.08.006.CrossRefPubMed
Steiner M, Boler T, Obhai G, Hubacher D. Assessment of a disposable trocar for insertion of contraceptive implants. Contraception. 2010;81(2):140–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.08.006.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Straetmans MJG. Disposable versus reusable instrumentarium bij laparoscopische cholecystectomie; een analyse van kosten en effecten in het Groene Hart Ziekenhuis te Gouda en het Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit; 2004.
Straetmans MJG. Disposable versus reusable instrumentarium bij laparoscopische cholecystectomie; een analyse van kosten en effecten in het Groene Hart Ziekenhuis te Gouda en het Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit; 2004.
3.
go back to reference Siu J, Hill A, MacCormick A. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety. ANZ J Surg. 2016;87(1–2):28–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13856.CrossRefPubMed
Siu J, Hill A, MacCormick A. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety. ANZ J Surg. 2016;87(1–2):28–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13856.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kelty C, Super P, Stoddard C. The driving force in trocar insertion A comparison between disposable and reusable trocars. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(11):1045–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000224.CrossRefPubMed
Kelty C, Super P, Stoddard C. The driving force in trocar insertion A comparison between disposable and reusable trocars. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(11):1045–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000224.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Watrowski R, Kostov S, Alkatout I. Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors – an up-to-date review. Videosurg Other Miniinv Tech. 2021;16(3):501–25. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.108800.CrossRef
Watrowski R, Kostov S, Alkatout I. Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors – an up-to-date review. Videosurg Other Miniinv Tech. 2021;16(3):501–25. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.108800.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Montero P, Robinson T, Weaver J, Stiegmann G. Insulation failure in laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(2):462–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0601-5.CrossRefPubMed
Montero P, Robinson T, Weaver J, Stiegmann G. Insulation failure in laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(2):462–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0601-5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Yung E, Gagner M, Pomp A, Dakin G, Milone L, Strain G. Cost comparison of reusable and single-use ultrasonic shears for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2008;20(4):512–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9723-4.CrossRefPubMed
Yung E, Gagner M, Pomp A, Dakin G, Milone L, Strain G. Cost comparison of reusable and single-use ultrasonic shears for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2008;20(4):512–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9723-4.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Fengler T, Pahlke H, Kraas E. Sterile and economic instrumentation in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(10):1275–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900836.CrossRefPubMed
Fengler T, Pahlke H, Kraas E. Sterile and economic instrumentation in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(10):1275–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900836.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fengler T, Pahlke H, Bisson S, Kraas E. The clinical suitability of laparoscopic instrumentation. A prospective clinical study of function and hygiene. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(4):388–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640020064.
Fengler T, Pahlke H, Bisson S, Kraas E. The clinical suitability of laparoscopic instrumentation. A prospective clinical study of function and hygiene. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(4):388–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640020064.
10.
go back to reference Weissmann C, Enari M, Klöhn P, Rossi D, Flechsig E. Transmission of prions. J Infect Dis. 2002;186(s2):S157–65. https://doi.org/10.1086/344575.CrossRefPubMed
Weissmann C, Enari M, Klöhn P, Rossi D, Flechsig E. Transmission of prions. J Infect Dis. 2002;186(s2):S157–65. https://doi.org/10.1086/344575.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference López F, Ruiz-Tovar M, Almazán-Isla J, Alcalde-Cabero E, Calero M, De Pedro-Cuesta J. Risk of transmission of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by surgical procedures: systematic reviews and quality of evidence. Eurosurveillance. 2017;22(43). https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.es.2017.22.43.16-00806.
López F, Ruiz-Tovar M, Almazán-Isla J, Alcalde-Cabero E, Calero M, De Pedro-Cuesta J. Risk of transmission of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by surgical procedures: systematic reviews and quality of evidence. Eurosurveillance. 2017;22(43). https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.es.2017.22.43.16-00806.
12.
go back to reference DesCôteaux J, Poulin E, Julien M, Guidoin R. Residual organic debris on processed surgical instruments. AORN J. 1995;62(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(06)63680-6.CrossRefPubMed
DesCôteaux J, Poulin E, Julien M, Guidoin R. Residual organic debris on processed surgical instruments. AORN J. 1995;62(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(06)63680-6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Blake J, Trumpatori B, Mathews K, Griffith E. Carotid artery bursting pressure and seal time after multiple uses of a vessel sealing device. Vet Surg. 2017;46(4):501–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12648.CrossRefPubMed
Blake J, Trumpatori B, Mathews K, Griffith E. Carotid artery bursting pressure and seal time after multiple uses of a vessel sealing device. Vet Surg. 2017;46(4):501–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12648.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chivukula S, Lammers S, Wagner J. Assessing organic material on single-use vessel sealing devices: a comparative study of reprocessed and new LigaSure™ devices. Surg Endosc. 2020;35(8):4539–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07969-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Chivukula S, Lammers S, Wagner J. Assessing organic material on single-use vessel sealing devices: a comparative study of reprocessed and new LigaSure™ devices. Surg Endosc. 2020;35(8):4539–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07969-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Lopes C, Graziano K, Pinto T. Evaluation of single-use reprocessed laparoscopic instrument sterilization. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011;19(2):370–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-11692011000200020.CrossRefPubMed
Lopes C, Graziano K, Pinto T. Evaluation of single-use reprocessed laparoscopic instrument sterilization. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011;19(2):370–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-11692011000200020.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Visrodia K, Haseeb A, Hanada Y, Pennington K, Clemens M, Pearce P, et al. Reprocessing of single-use endoscopic variceal band ligation devices: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2017;49(12):1202–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-115004.CrossRefPubMed
Visrodia K, Haseeb A, Hanada Y, Pennington K, Clemens M, Pearce P, et al. Reprocessing of single-use endoscopic variceal band ligation devices: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2017;49(12):1202–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-115004.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Quitzan J, Singh A, Beaufrere H, Valverde A, Lillie B, Salahshoor M, et al. Evaluation of the performance of an endoscopic 3‐mm electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device intended for single use after multiple use‐and‐resterilization cycles. Veterinary Surg. 2020;49(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13396.
Quitzan J, Singh A, Beaufrere H, Valverde A, Lillie B, Salahshoor M, et al. Evaluation of the performance of an endoscopic 3‐mm electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device intended for single use after multiple use‐and‐resterilization cycles. Veterinary Surg. 2020;49(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13396.
18.
go back to reference Colak T, Ersoz G, Akca T, Kanik A, Aydin S. Efficacy and safety of reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8112-x.
Colak T, Ersoz G, Akca T, Kanik A, Aydin S. Efficacy and safety of reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8112-x.
19.
go back to reference Traverso L, Hargrave K. A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1995;169(5):503–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80205-0.CrossRefPubMed
Traverso L, Hargrave K. A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1995;169(5):503–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80205-0.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Morrison J, Jacobs V. Replacement of expensive, disposable instruments with old-fashioned surgical techniques for improved cost-effectiveness in laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Soc Laparosc Robot Surg. 2004;8(2):201–6.
Morrison J, Jacobs V. Replacement of expensive, disposable instruments with old-fashioned surgical techniques for improved cost-effectiveness in laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Soc Laparosc Robot Surg. 2004;8(2):201–6.
21.
go back to reference Schaer G, Koechli O, Haller U. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 1995;173(6):1812–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90432-8.CrossRef
Schaer G, Koechli O, Haller U. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 1995;173(6):1812–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90432-8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Holloran-Schwartz M, Gavard J, Martin J, Blaskiewicz R, Yeung P. Single-use energy sources and operating room time for laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(1):72–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.881.
Holloran-Schwartz M, Gavard J, Martin J, Blaskiewicz R, Yeung P. Single-use energy sources and operating room time for laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(1):72–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.881.
23.
go back to reference Vasios N, Verroiotou M, Komninos G, Arapoglou S, Fragandreas G. Study of the cost of mainly reusable equipment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hell J Surg. 2013;85(2):101–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-013-0018-4.CrossRef
Vasios N, Verroiotou M, Komninos G, Arapoglou S, Fragandreas G. Study of the cost of mainly reusable equipment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hell J Surg. 2013;85(2):101–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-013-0018-4.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Slater M, Booth M, Dehn T. Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009;91(8):670–2. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588409x12486167521154.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Slater M, Booth M, Dehn T. Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009;91(8):670–2. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588409x12486167521154.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Adler S, Scherrer M, Rückauer K, Daschner F. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004;19(2):268–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9232-4.CrossRefPubMed
Adler S, Scherrer M, Rückauer K, Daschner F. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004;19(2):268–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9232-4.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ransom S, McNeeley S, White C, Diamond M. A cost-effectiveness evaluation of laparoscopic disposable versus nondisposable infraumbilical cannulas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;4(1):25–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(96)80104-6.CrossRefPubMed
Ransom S, McNeeley S, White C, Diamond M. A cost-effectiveness evaluation of laparoscopic disposable versus nondisposable infraumbilical cannulas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;4(1):25–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(96)80104-6.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Apelgren K, Blank M, Slomski C, Hadjis N. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994;8(1):32–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02909490.CrossRefPubMed
Apelgren K, Blank M, Slomski C, Hadjis N. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994;8(1):32–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02909490.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Allen J, Polk H Jr. A study of added costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgery preference cards. Am J Surg. 2002;68(5):474–6.CrossRef
Allen J, Polk H Jr. A study of added costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgery preference cards. Am J Surg. 2002;68(5):474–6.CrossRef
29.
30.
go back to reference Aubry T. The green new deal. Greenpeace. https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/the-green-new-deal/.
Aubry T. The green new deal. Greenpeace. https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/the-green-new-deal/.
31.
go back to reference Thiel C, Woods N, Bilec M. Strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from laparoscopic surgery. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(S2):S158–64. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2018.304397.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Thiel C, Woods N, Bilec M. Strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from laparoscopic surgery. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(S2):S158–64. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2018.304397.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Rizan C, Bhutta M. Environmental impact and life cycle financial cost of hybrid (reusable/single-use) instruments versus single-use equivalents in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08728-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Rizan C, Bhutta M. Environmental impact and life cycle financial cost of hybrid (reusable/single-use) instruments versus single-use equivalents in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08728-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Conrardy J, Hillanbrand M, Myers S, Nussbaum G. Reducing medical waste. AORN J. 2010;91(6):711–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2009.12.029.CrossRefPubMed
Conrardy J, Hillanbrand M, Myers S, Nussbaum G. Reducing medical waste. AORN J. 2010;91(6):711–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2009.12.029.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Ibbotson S, Dettmer T, Kara S, Herrmann C. Eco-efficiency of disposable and reusable surgical instruments – a scissors case. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013;18(5):1137–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0547-7.CrossRef
Ibbotson S, Dettmer T, Kara S, Herrmann C. Eco-efficiency of disposable and reusable surgical instruments – a scissors case. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013;18(5):1137–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0547-7.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference MacNeill A, Lillywhite R, Brown C. The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1(9):e381–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30162-6.CrossRefPubMed
MacNeill A, Lillywhite R, Brown C. The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1(9):e381–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30162-6.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Broeders IAMJ, Kalisingh SS. Handboek endoscopische chirurgie. In: De Hoog DENM, Straetmans MJG, Bouvy ND. Disposables of reusables bij endoscopische ingrepen (Chapter 11). Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2009.
Broeders IAMJ, Kalisingh SS. Handboek endoscopische chirurgie. In: De Hoog DENM, Straetmans MJG, Bouvy ND. Disposables of reusables bij endoscopische ingrepen (Chapter 11). Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2009.
Metagegevens
- Titel
- Disposable and reusable instruments in endoscopic surgery
- Auteurs
-
Myrthe M. M. Eussen, BSc
Dr. Martine Moossdorff, MD, PhD
Prof. Dr. Nicole D. Bouvy, MD PhD
- Copyright
- 2024
- Uitgeverij
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
- Boek
-
The Technical Principles of Endoscopic Surgery
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2904-5
Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2905-2
Copyright: 2024
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2905-2_31