Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Gepubliceerd in:
hoofdstuk lezen eerste hoofdstuk lezen

2024 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

32. Future concepts of instrument design

Auteurs : Dr. Ir. Aimée Sakes, Prof. Dr. Ir. Paul Breedveld

Gepubliceerd in: The Technical Principles of Endoscopic Surgery

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Conventional medical devices are manufactured using standard techniques such as injection molding and CNC. Conventional instruments usually consist of many individual parts based on standard components, such as pulleys, that are used in other technical fields in much larger dimensions. Squeezing down these components into miniature dimensions and fitting everything together, requires elaborate manufacturing and assembly, increasing costs and limiting further size decrease. This chapter deals with the benefits of bio-inspiration, applying smart working principles from nature within innovative medical devices, combined with the incredible manufacturing possibilities of additive manufacturing or 3D printing, enabling the manufacture of prototypes that are much simpler and with higher functionality than conventional tools. The chapter also deals with the limitations of 3D printing at small dimensions, requiring new design approaches and clever ways to merge sterilization with the 3D printing process, to realize broad acceptance for use in the future OR.
vorige hoofdstuk Disposable and reusable instruments in endoscopic surgery
volgende hoofdstuk Cleaning, sterilization, and maintenance
Literatuur
1.
Freschi C, Ferrari V, Melfi F, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. Int J Med Robot Comp Assist Surg. 2013;9(4):396–406.CrossRef
2.
Van Leeuwen J, Kier WM. Functional design of tentacles in squid: linking sarcomere ultrastructure to gross morphological dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997;352(1353):551–71.
3.
Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):1–21.CrossRef
4.
Kermavnar T, Shannon A, O’Sullivan KJ, McCarthy C, Dunne CP, O’Sullivan LW. Three-dimensional printing of medical devices used directly to treat patients: a systematic review. 3D Print Addit Manufactur. 2021;8(6):366–408.
5.
Nuseir A, Hatamleh MMD, Alnazzawi A, Al‐Rabab’ah M, Kamel B, Jaradat E. Direct 3D printing of flexible nasal prosthesis: optimized digital workflow from scan to fit. J Prosthod. 2019;28(1):10–14.
6.
Culmone C, Smit G, Breedveld P. Additive manufacturing of medical instruments: a state-of-the-art review. Addit Manuf. 2019;27:461–73.
7.
Cuellar JS, Plettenburg D, Zadpoor AA, Breedveld P, Smit G. Design of a 3D-printed hand prosthesis featuring articulated bio-inspired fingers. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2021;235(3):336–45.CrossRef
8.
Kim Y, Cheng SS, Desai JP. Towards the development of a spring-based continuum robot for neurosurgery. Paper presented at the Medical Imaging 2015: image-guided procedures, robotic interventions, and modeling. 2015.
9.
Jelínek F, Breedveld P. Design for additive manufacture of fine medical instrumentation – DragonFlex case study. J Mech Design. 2015;137(11).
10.
Jelínek F, Pessers R, Breedveld P. DragonFlex smart steerable laparoscopic instrument. J Med Dev. 2014;8(1).
11.
Sakes A, Hovland K, Smit G, Geraedts J, Breedveld P. Design of a novel three-dimensional-printed two degrees-of-freedom steerable electrosurgical grasper for minimally invasive surgery. J Med Dev. 2018;12(1).
12.
Culmone C, Henselmans PW, Van Starkenburg RI, Breedveld P. Exploring non-assembly 3D printing for novel compliant surgical devices. PLoS One. 2020;15(5): e0232952.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Remes A, Williams D. Immune response in biocompatibility. The Biomaterials: Silver Jubilee Compendium, 79–91.
14.
Anderson JM. Biological responses to materials. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2001;31(1):81–110.CrossRef
15.
Lussenburg K, Scali M, Sakes A, Breedveld P. Additive manufacturing of a miniature functional trocar for eye surgery. Front Med Technol. 2022;4: 842958.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Alifui-Segbaya F, Varma S, Lieschke GJ, George R. Biocompatibility of photopolymers in 3D printing. 3D Print and Addit Manufactur. 2017;4(4):185–91.
17.
Oskui SM, Diamante G, Liao C, Shi W, Gan J, Schlenk D, Grover WH. Assessing and reducing the toxicity of 3D-printed parts. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2016;3(1):1–6.CrossRef
18.
Rogers HB, Zhou LT, Kusuhara A, Zaniker E, Shafaie S, Owen BC, Woodruff TK. Dental resins used in 3D printing technologies release ovo-toxic leachates. Chemosphere. 2021;270: 129003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
20.
Broeders IAMJ, Kalisingh SS. Handboek endoscopische chirurgie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2009.
Metagegevens
Titel
Future concepts of instrument design
Auteurs
Dr. Ir. Aimée Sakes
Prof. Dr. Ir. Paul Breedveld
Copyright
2024
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek
The Technical Principles of Endoscopic Surgery

Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2904-5

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2905-2

Copyright: 2024

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2905-2_32