Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-09-2013

Measurement issues in the evaluation of chronic disease self-management programs

Auteurs: Sandra Nolte, Gerald R. Elsworth, Stanton Newman, Richard H. Osborne

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Objectives

To provide an in-depth analysis of outcome measures used in the evaluation of chronic disease self-management programs consistent with the Stanford curricula.

Methods

Based on a systematic review on self-management programs, effect sizes derived from reported outcome measures are categorized according to the quality of life appraisal model developed by Schwartz and Rapkin which classifies outcomes from performance-based measures (e.g., clinical outcomes) to evaluation-based measures (e.g., emotional well-being).

Results

The majority of outcomes assessed in self-management trials are based on evaluation-based methods. Overall, effects on knowledge—the only performance-based measure observed in selected trials—are generally medium to large. In contrast, substantially more inconsistent results are found for both perception- and evaluation-based measures that mostly range between nil and small positive effects.

Conclusions

Effectiveness of self-management interventions and resulting recommendations for health policy makers are most frequently derived from highly variable evaluation-based measures, that is, types of outcomes that potentially carry a substantial amount of measurement error and/or bias such as response shift. Therefore, decisions regarding the value and efficacy of chronic disease self-management programs need to be interpreted with care. More research, especially qualitative studies, is needed to unravel cognitive processes and the role of response shift bias in the measurement of change.
vorige artikel Physical activity and quality of life in older adults: an 18-month panel analysis
volgende artikel The association of responsiveness in oral and general health-related quality of life with patients’ satisfaction of new complete dentures
Literatuur
1.
Wagner, E., Davis, C., Schaefer, J., Von Korff, M., & Austin, B. (1999). A survey of leading chronic disease management programs: Are they consistent with the literature? Managed Care Quarterly, 7(3), 56–66.PubMed
2.
World Health Organization. (2002). Innovative care for chronic conditions: building blocks for action. Geneva: World Health Organization.
3.
Newman, S., Steed, L., & Mulligan, K. (2004). Self-management interventions for chronic illness. Lancet, 364(9444), 1523–1537.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Barlow, J., Wright, C., Sheasby, J., Turner, A., & Hainsworth, J. (2002). Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Education and Counseling, 48(2), 177–187.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Lorig, K. R., González, V. M., & Laurent, D. D. (1999). The chronic disease self-management program: Leaders manual. Palo Alto: Stanford University.
6.
Lorig, K. R. (2003). Editorial—self-management education: More than a nice extra. Medical Care, 41(6), 699–701.PubMed
7.
Chodosh, J., Morton, S. C., Mojica, W., Maglione, M., Suttorp, M. J., Hilton, L., et al. (2005). Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143(6), 427–438.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Warsi, A., Wang, P. S., LaValley, M. P., Avorn, J., & Solomon, D. H. (2004). Self-management education programs in chronic disease: A systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Archives of Internal Medicine, 164(15), 1641–1649.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Astin, J. A., Beckner, W., Soeken, K., Hochberg, M. C., & Berman, B. (2002). Psychological interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 47(3), 291–302.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Devos-Comby, L., Cronan, T., & Roesch, S. C. (2006). Do exercise and self-management interventions benefit patients with osteoarthritis of the knee? A metaanalytic review. The Journal of Rheumatology, 33(4), 744–756.PubMed
11.
Warsi, A., LaValley, M. P., Wang, P. S., Avorn, J., & Solomon, D. H. (2003). Arthritis self-management education programs: A meta-analysis of the effect on pain and disability. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 48(8), 2207–2213.PubMedCrossRef
12.
March, L., Amatya, B., Osborne, R., & Brand, C. (2010). Developing a minimum standard of care for treating people with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Best Practice & Research Clinical rheumatology, 24(1), 121–145.CrossRef
13.
14.
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1985). Cognitive and affective processes in judgements of subjective well-being: A preliminary model. In H. Brandstatter & E. Kirchler (Eds.), Economic psychology (pp. 439–447). Linz, Austria: R. Tauner.
15.
Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299–314.CrossRef
16.
17.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York, London, Sydney: Wiley.
18.
Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (1999). Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1531–1548.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Nolte, S., & Osborne, R. H. (2012). A systematic review of outcomes of chronic disease self-management interventions. Quality of Life Research [Epub ahead of print 2012 Oct 31].
21.
Lorig, K., Lubeck, D., Kraines, R. G., Seleznick, M., & Holman, H. R. (1985). Outcomes of self-help education for patients with arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 28(6), 680–685.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
Heuts, P. H. T. G., de Bie, R., Drietelaar, M., Aretz, K., Hopman-Rock, M., Bastiaenen, C. H. G., et al. (2005). Self-management in osteoarthritis of hip or knee: A randomized clinical trial in a primary healthcare setting. The Journal of Rheumatology, 32(3), 543–549.PubMed
24.
Hopman-Rock, M., & Westhoff, M. H. (2000). The effects of a health educational and exercise program for older adults with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The Journal of Rheumatology, 27(8), 1947–1954.PubMed
25.
Keefe, F. J., Caldwell, D. S., Wiliams, D. A., Gil, K. M., Mitchell, D., Robertson, C., et al. (1990). Pain coping skills training in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain: A comparative study. Behavior Therapy, 21, 49–62.CrossRef
26.
Barlow, J. H., Turner, A. P., & Wright, C. C. (2000). A randomized controlled study of the Arthritis self-management programme in the UK. Health Education Research, 15(6), 665–680.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Lorig, K., Feigenbaum, P., Regan, C., Ung, E., Chastain, R. L., & Holman, H. R. (1986). A comparison of lay-taught and professional-taught arthritis self-management courses. Journal of Rheumatology, 13(4), 763–767.PubMed
28.
Lorig, K., González, V. M., & Ritter, P. (1999). Community-based Spanish language arthritis education program: A randomized trial. Medical Care, 37(9), 957–963.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Lorig, K., Seleznick, M., Lubeck, D., Ung, E., Chastain, R. L., & Holman, H. R. (1989). The beneficial outcomes of the arthritis self-management course are not adequately explained by behavior change. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 32(1), 91–95.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Goeppinger, J., Arthur, M. W., Baglioni, A. J., Jr, Brunk, S. E., & Brunner, C. M. (1989). A reexamination of the effectiveness of self-care education for persons with arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 32(6), 706–716.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Scholten, C., Brodowicz, T., Graninger, W., Gardavsky, I., Pils, K., Pesau, B., et al. (1999). Persistent functional and social benefit 5 years after a multidisciplinary arthritis training program. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 1282–1287.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Taal, E., Riemsma, R. P., Brus, H. L., Seydel, E. R., Rasker, J. J., & Wiegman, O. (1993). Group education for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Patient Education and Counseling, 20(2–3), 177–187.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Haas, M., Groupp, E., Muench, J., Kraemer, D., Brummel-Smith, K., Sharma, R., et al. (2005). Chronic disease self-management program for low back pain in the elderly. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 28(4), 228–237.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Von Korff, M., Moore, J. E., Lorig, K., Cherkin, D. C., Saunders, K., González, V. M., et al. (1998). A randomized trial of a lay person-led self-management group intervention for back pain patients in primary care. Spine, 23(23), 2608–2615.CrossRef
35.
LeFort, S. M., Gray-Donald, K., Rowat, K. M., & Jeans, M. E. (1998). Randomized controlled trial of a community-based psychoeducation program for the self-management of chronic pain. Pain, 74(2–3), 297–306.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Burckhardt, C. S., Mannerkorpi, K., Hedenberg, L., & Bjelle, A. (1994). A randomized, controlled clinical trial of education and physical training for women with fibromyalgia. Journal of Rheumatology, 21, 714–720.
37.
Fu, D., Fu, H., McGowan, P., Shen, Y.-E., Zhu, L., Yang, H., et al. (2003). Implementation and quantitative evaluation of chronic disease self-management programme in Shanghai, China: Randomized controlled trial. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81(3), 174–182.PubMed
38.
Griffiths, C., Motlib, J., Azad, A., Ramsay, J., Eldridge, S., Feder, G., et al. (2005). Randomised controlled trial of a lay-led self-management programme for Bangladeshi patients with chronic disease. British Journal of General Practice, 55, 831–837.PubMed
39.
Lorig, K. R., Ritter, P. L., & González, V. M. (2003). Hispanic chronic disease self-management—a randomized community-based outcome trial. Nursing Research, 52(6), 361–369.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Lorig, K. R., Sobel, D. S., Stewart, A. L., Brown, B. W., Bandura, A., Ritter, P., et al. (1999). Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization. Medical Care, 37(1), 5–14.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Gibbons, F. X. (1999). Social comparison as a mediator of response shift. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1517–1530.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., & Evers, K. E. (2008). The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In K. Glanz, F. M. Lewis, & B. K. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed., pp. 97–122). San Francisco: Wiley.
43.
Buunk, B., Gibbons, F., & Visser, A. (2002). The relevance of social comparison processes for prevention and health care. Patient Education and Counseling, 47, 1–3.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Osborne, R. H., Batterham, R., & Livingston, J. (2011). The evaluation of chronic disease self-management support across settings: The international experience of the health education impact questionnaire monitoring system. Nursing Clinics of North America, 46(3), 255–270.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Brady, T. (1997). Do common arthritis self-efficacy measures really measure self-efficacy? Arthritis Care and Research, 10(1), 1–8.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Osborne, R. H., Elsworth, G. R., & Whitfield, K. (2007). The health education impact questionnaire (heiQ): An outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Education and Counseling, 66, 192–201.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Measurement issues in the evaluation of chronic disease self-management programs
Auteurs
Sandra Nolte
Gerald R. Elsworth
Stanton Newman
Richard H. Osborne
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0317-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2013

Determinants of health-related quality of life in people with Parkinson’s disease: a path analysis

Pitfalls in the interpretation of standardised quality of life instruments for individual patients? A qualitative study in colorectal cancer

Intergenerational educational mobility on general mental health and depressive symptoms in young women

Evaluating the Serbian version of the KIDSCREEN quality-of-life questionnaires: reliability, validity, and agreement between children’s and parents’ ratings

  • Brief Communication

Perception of stress level, trunk appearance, body function and mental health in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated conservatively: a longitudinal analysis

  • Open Access

Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS®) Spanish-language physical functioning items