Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij Scalda & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Scalda heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen.Je kunt de producten hieronder links aanschaffen en rechts inloggen.

» Andere revante producten voor Scalda studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Schaf de BSL Academy aan: 

BSL Academy mbo AG

Eenmaal aangeschaft kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met Jan van der Velden.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Gepubliceerd in:

01-12-2009

Comparison of Three Self-Report Measures of Personality Pathology

Auteurs: Mayumi Okada, Thomas F. Oltmanns

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 4/2009

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Levels of convergence were examined among three personality instruments: the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders Questionnaire (SCID-IIQ) and the Multi-source Assessment of Personality Pathology (MAPP). Each personality questionnaire was administered three times in an alternating sequence over nine consecutive weekdays to a sample of college students. There was some degree of convergence among the three instruments, but there were also substantial empirical differences between them. The data suggest three related conclusions: (1) in general, the self-report version of the MAPP is more conservative than the other two questionnaires, (2) these questionnaires are not interchangeable measures of personality disorders, and (3) the breadth of measurement provided varies as a function of both the questionnaire and the personality disorder being measured.
vorige artikel Positive and Negative Affect in Parents and Adolescents: Gender and Assessment Method Considerations
volgende artikel Narcissism Predicts Therapy Outcome in Psychosomatic Patients
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
It is recognized that it is not appropriate to make “diagnoses” of personality disorders without administering a semi-structured interview. In this paper, the term “diagnosis” is used simply to note that the individual met or exceeded the number of criteria needed to make diagnoses.
 
Literatuur
Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227-257.S84.
Davison, S., Leese, M., & Taylor, P. J. (2001). Examination of the screening properties of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire 4+ (PDQ-4+) in a prison population. Journal of Personality Disorders, 15, 180–194.CrossRefPubMed
Ekselius, L., Lindstrèom, E., von Knorring, L., Bodlund, O., & Kullgren, G. (1994). SCID II interviews and the SCID Screen questionnaire as diagnostic tools for personality disorders in DSM-III–R. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 90, 120–123.CrossRefPubMed
Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, S. P., & Ruan, W. J. (2005). Co-occurrence of DSM-IV personality disorders in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 46, 1-5.
Hyler, S. E. (1994). The personality diagnostic questionnaire 4+. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Hyler, S. E., & Rieder, R. O. (1987). PDQ-R: Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-revised. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Hyler, S. E., Skodol, A. E., Kellman, H. D., Oldham, J. M., & Rosnick, L. (1990). The validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire: a comparison with two structured interviews. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1043–1048.PubMed
Hyler, S. E., Skodol, A. E., Oldham, J. M., Kellman, H. D., & Doidge, N. (1992). Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised: a replication in an outpatient sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 33(2), 73–77.CrossRefPubMed
Jacobsberg, L., Perry, S., & Frances, A. (1995). Diagnostic agreement between the SCID-II screening questionnaire and the Personality Disorder Examination. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 428–433.CrossRefPubMed
Klein, D. N. (2003). Patients’ versus informants’ reports of personality disorders in predicting 7 1/2 year outcome in outpatients with depressive disorders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 216–222.CrossRefPubMed
McDermut, W., & Zimmerman, M. (2005). Assessment instruments and standardized evaluation. In J. M. Oldham, A. E. Skodol, & D. S. Bender (Eds.), Textbook of personality disorders. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric.
Lenzenweger, M. F., Lane, M. C., Loranger, A. W., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). DSM-IV personality disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biological Psychiatry, 62, 553-564.
Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2006). Perceptions of self and others regarding pathological personality traits. In R. F. Krueger, & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 71–111). New York, NY: Guilford.
Oltmanns, T. F., Turkheimer, E., & Strauss, M. E. (1998). Peer assessment of personality traits and pathology in female college students. Assessment, 5, 53–65.CrossRef
Perry, J. C. (1992). Problems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 1645–1653.PubMed
Skodol, A. E., Oldham, J. M., Rosnick, L., Kellman, H. D., & Hyler, S. E. (1991). Diagnosis of DSM-III-R personality disorders: a comparison with two structured interviews. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 1, 13–26.
Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1990). User“s guide for the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R: SCID. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric.
Thomas, C., Turkheimer, E., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2003). Factorial structure of personality as evaluated by peers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 81–91.PubMedCrossRef
Torgersen, S., Kringlen, E., & Cramer, V. (2001). The prevalence of personality disorders in a community sample. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 590–596.CrossRefPubMed
Westen, D. (1997). Divergences between clinical and research methods for assessing personality disorders: Implications for research and the evolution of Axis II. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 895–903.PubMed
Zimmerman, M., & Coryell, W. H. (1990). Diagnosing personality disorders in the community: A comparison of self-report and interview measures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 527–531.PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Comparison of Three Self-Report Measures of Personality Pathology
Auteurs
Mayumi Okada
Thomas F. Oltmanns
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2009
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9130-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2009

An Exploratory Study of Integrative Personality Pathology Systems and the Interpersonal Circumplex

The Role of Anxiety/Depression in the Development of Youth High Risk Behaviors: An Examination of Two Competing Hypotheses in a Sample of African-American, Single Mother Families

Ad Hoc Reviewers—2009

Illustration of MIMIC-Model DIF Testing with the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality

Unidimensionality and Developmental Trajectory of Aggressive Behavior in Clinically-Referred Boys: A Rasch Analysis

Eating Disorders Inventory: Assessment of its Construct Validity in a Nonclinical French Sample of Adolescents